World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10467 9796 5500 5021 126 5425

Martin Heesacker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Heesacker between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Heesacker published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2012. 4 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2012. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1981 2025

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Heesacker: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 2
1983 6
1984 5
1985 0
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 3
1993 3
1994 2
1995 3
1996 3
1997 5
1998 1
1999 3
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 4
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 2
2010 2
2011 2
2012 9
2013 3
2014 6
2015 7
2016 4
2017 4
2018 7
2019 3
2020 7
2021 1
2022 1
2023 3
2024 2
2025 2
Total 133
Download as CSV

Martin Heesacker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Heesacker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 126
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Heesacker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Heesacker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Martin Heesacker is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, as well as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics of their research work encompass:

  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
  • Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Family Support in Illness

Their publication record includes papers in various scholarly venues. Notable venues and the number of publications by Heesacker are:

  • The Counseling Psychologist (3 publications)
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science (1)
  • Leisure/Loisir (1)
  • American Journal of Family Therapy (1)
  • Counselling Psychology Quarterly (1)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin Heesacker include:

  • "In Memoriam: Dorothy Dobbins Nevill (1935-2022) Sage, Saint, and Servant," published in 2023 in The Counseling Psychologist
  • "Do Women Withhold Honest Sexual Communication When They Believe Their Partner's Manhood is Threatened?," published in 2022 in Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Planning leisure: helpful or harmful?" published in 2020 in Leisure/Loisir
  • "Perceived Family Benefits Overshadowed Parentification in Predicting Life Satisfaction and Relationship Satisfaction," published in 2025 in American Journal of Family Therapy
  • "Tending the grapevine: a qualitative analysis of responses to a psychotherapist-in-training testing positive for COVID-19," published in 2020 in Counselling Psychology Quarterly

Martin Heesacker has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • S. Monaco
  • Jessica Jordan
  • Joseph A. Vandello
  • Dylan Larson-Konar
  • Haley M. Sterling

In recognition of professional contributions, Martin Heesacker was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2010.

Best Publications

  • Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis.

    Richard E. Petty;John T. Cacioppo;Martin Heesacker

  • Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking

    Martin Heesacker;Richard E. Petty;John T. Cacioppo

  • A multicultural investigation of masculinity ideology and alexithymia.

    Ronald F. Levant;Katherine Richmond;Richard G. Majors;Jaime E. Inclan

  • Confirming Gender Stereotypes: A Social Role Perspective

    David L. Vogel;Stephen R. Wester;Martin Heesacker;Stephanie Madon

  • Sex Differences in Emotion: A Critical Review of the Literature and Implications for Counseling Psychology

    Stephen R. Wester;David L. Vogel;Page K. Pressly;Martin Heesacker

  • Better Off Than We Know Distorted Perceptions of Incomes and Income Inequality in America

    John R. Chambers;Lawton K. Swan;Martin Heesacker

  • Changing the Sexual Aggression-Supportive Attitudes of Men: A Psychoeducational Intervention.

    Barbara J. Gilbert;Martin Heesacker;Linda J. Gannon

  • Why Is Benevolent Sexism Appealing? Associations With System Justification and Life Satisfaction

    Kathleen Connelly;Martin Heesacker

  • The Physical Environment and Counseling: A Review of Theory and Research

    Page K. Pressly;Martin Heesacker

  • Gender-based emotional stereotyping.

    Martin Heesacker;Stephen R. Wester;David L. Vogel;Jeffrey T. Wentzel

  • Perceived counselor characteristics, client expectations, and client satisfaction with counseling.

    P. Paul Heppner;Martin Heesacker

  • The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Implications for the Practice of School Psychology.

    Richard E. Petty;Martin Heesacker;Jan N. Hughes

  • Interpersonal Influence Process in Real Life Counseling: Investigating Client Perceptions, Counselor Experience Level, and Counselor Power over Time.

    P. Paul Heppner;Martin Heesacker

  • THE INFLUENCE OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT RAP MUSIC ON ATTITUDES OF MEN WITH LITTLE PRIOR EXPOSURE

    Stephen R. Wester;Cynthia L. Crown;Gerald L. Quatman;Martin Heesacker

  • Anti-Atheist Bias in the United States: Testing Two Critical Assumptions

    Lawton K Swan;Martin Heesacker

  • Classics and Emerging Classics in Counseling Psychology.

    Martin Heesacker;P. Paul Heppner;Mark E. Rogers

  • The Effects of Recipient Posture on Persuasion A Cognitive Response Analysis

    Richard E. Petty;Gary L. Wells;Martin Heesacker;Timothy C. Brock

  • Changing the Rape-Supportive Attitudes of Traditional and Nontraditional Male and Female College Students.

    Eric H. Rosenthal;Martin Heesacker;Greg J. Neimeyer

  • A culturally sensitive Transition Assistance Program for stroke caregivers: examining caregiver mental health and stroke rehabilitation.

    Paul B. Perrin;Andrew Johnston;Bruce Vogel;Martin Heesacker

  • Masculinity ideology among Russian and U.S. young men and women and its relationships to unhealthy lifestyles habits among young Russian men.

    Ronald F. Levant;Adele Cuthbert;Katherine Richmond;Alfred Sellers

  • Model Training Program in Counseling Psychology

    Nancy L. Murdock;John D. Alcorn;Martin Heesacker;Cal Stoltenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

P. Paul Heppner
P. Paul Heppner University of Missouri
John Mueller
John Mueller The Ohio State University
John T. Cacioppo
John T. Cacioppo University of Chicago
Richard E. Petty
Richard E. Petty The Ohio State University
David L. Vogel
David L. Vogel Iowa State University
Ronald F. Levant
Ronald F. Levant University of Akron
Blake A. Allan
Blake A. Allan University of Houston
Timothy R. Elliott
Timothy R. Elliott Texas A&M University
Timothy C. Brock
Timothy C. Brock The Ohio State University
Gary L. Wells
Gary L. Wells Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens doors to a range of online programs and career options across the United States. Online degrees in psychology deliver flexibility for students balancing work, internships, or family obligations, while also offering specialized courses tailored to evolving industry needs.

When choosing a program, research regional offerings to find the best fit for your goals. For instance, the best psychology degree rankings in Austin highlight schools integrating real-world learning opportunities. Similarly, California’s higher education institutions are renowned nationally, as detailed in the best psychology degree programs ranking in California.

Programs in other regions, such as the best psychology degree programs ranking in Charleston and the best psychology program rankings in Charlotte, offer unique pathways in clinical, counseling, and organizational psychology.

Whether you pursue online or campus-based study, these programs all provide a strong foundation for graduates aiming for careers in mental health, research, human resources, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Heesacker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles