World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5238
World Ranking
10480
National Ranking
729

Mark Wade publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wade sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark Wade D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wade sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Heather Prime;Mark Wade;Dillon T. Browne

  • Why we need longitudinal mental health research with children and youth during (and after) the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Mark Wade;Heather Prime;Dillon T. Browne

  • Maternal Adverse Childhood Experience and Infant Health: Biomedical and Psychosocial Risks as Intermediary Mechanisms.

    Sheri Madigan;Sheri Madigan;Mark Wade;Andre Plamondon;Jonathon L. Maguire

  • On the relation between theory of mind and executive functioning: A developmental cognitive neuroscience perspective.

    Mark Wade;Heather Prime;Jennifer M Jenkins;Keith O Yeates

  • Association between abuse history and adolescent pregnancy: a meta-analysis.

    Sheri Madigan;Mark Wade;George Tarabulsy;Jennifer M. Jenkins

  • Associations of Early-Life Threat and Deprivation With Executive Functioning in Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Dylan Johnson;Julia Policelli;Min Li;Alyna Dharamsi

  • The effects of early life adversity on children’s mental health and cognitive functioning

    Unknown

  • The disparate impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of female and male caregivers.

    Mark Wade;Heather Prime;Dylan Johnson;Shealyn S. May

  • Maternal abuse history, postpartum depression, and parenting: links with preschoolers' internalizing problems.

    Sheri Madigan;Mark Wade;Andre Plamondon;Jennifer Jenkins

  • Early deprivation alters structural brain development from middle childhood to adolescence

    Unknown

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences: Implications for Offspring Telomere Length and Psychopathology.

    Kyle C. Esteves;Christopher W. Jones;Mark Wade;Keegan Callerame

  • Long-term effects of institutional rearing, foster care, and brain activity on memory and executive functioning

    Mark Wade;Nathan A. Fox;Charles H. Zeanah;Charles A. Nelson;Charles A. Nelson

  • COVID-19 disruption gets inside the family: A two-month multilevel study of family stress during the pandemic.

    Dillon T Browne;Mark Wade;Shealyn S May;Jennifer M Jenkins

  • Growth faltering is associated with altered brain functional connectivity and cognitive outcomes in urban Bangladeshi children exposed to early adversity

    Wanze Xie;Wanze Xie;Sarah K. G. Jensen;Sarah K. G. Jensen;Mark Wade;Swapna Kumar

  • Effect of Foster Care Intervention on Trajectories of General and Specific Psychopathology Among Children With Histories of Institutional Rearing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Mark Wade;Nathan A. Fox;Charles H. Zeanah;Charles A. Nelson;Charles A. Nelson

  • Stress sensitization among severely neglected children and protection by social enrichment

    Mark Wade;Charles H. Zeanah;Nathan A. Fox;Florin Tibu

  • Global deficits in executive functioning are transdiagnostic mediators between severe childhood neglect and psychopathology in adolescence.

    Mark Wade;Charles H Zeanah;Nathan A Fox;Charles A Nelson

  • School readiness amongst urban Canadian families: Risk profiles and family mediation.

    Dillon T. Browne;Mark Wade;Heather Prime;Jennifer M. Jenkins

  • Cumulative risk and developmental health: an argument for the importance of a family-wide science.

    Dillon T. Browne;Andre Plamondon;Heather Prime;Sofia Puente-Duran

  • The role of maternal responsiveness and linguistic input in pre-academic skill development: A longitudinal analysis of pathways

    Mark Wade;Jennifer M. Jenkins;Vaunam P. Venkadasalam;Noam Binnoon-Erez

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer Jenkins
Jennifer Jenkins University of Toronto
Charles A. Nelson
Charles A. Nelson Boston Children's Hospital
Geoffrey M. Wahl
Geoffrey M. Wahl Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Sheri Madigan
Sheri Madigan University of Calgary
Charles H. Zeanah
Charles H. Zeanah Tulane University
Nathan A. Fox
Nathan A. Fox University of Maryland, College Park
Loren D. Walensky
Loren D. Walensky Harvard University
Michelle R. Arkin
Michelle R. Arkin University of California, San Francisco
Felicity E. B. May
Felicity E. B. May Newcastle University
Tim H M Huang
Tim H M Huang The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark Wade

Recently Published Articles