World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
36
Citations
3778
World Ranking
4981
National Ranking
312

Mark Conyers publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Conyers sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 104 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Mark Conyers D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Conyers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Sense and nonsense in conservation agriculture: Principles, pragmatism and productivity in Australian mixed farming systems

    John A. Kirkegaard;Mark K. Conyers;James R. Hunt;Clive A. Kirkby

  • Soil carbon dynamics under different cropping and pasture management in temperate Australia: Results of three long-term experiments

    Kwong Yin Chan;Mark Conyers;Guangdi Li;Keith Helyar

  • Inorganic Nutrients Increase Humification Efficiency and C-Sequestration in an Annually Cropped Soil

    Clive A. Kirkby;Clive A. Kirkby;Alan E. Richardson;Len J. Wade;Mark Conyers

  • Soil carbon stocks under different pastures and pasture management in the higher rainfall areas of south-eastern Australia

    Kwong Yin Chan;Albert Oates;Guangdi Li;Mark Conyers

  • Long-term surface application of lime ameliorates subsurface soil acidity in the mixed farming zone of south-eastern Australia.

    Guangdi D. Li;Mark K. Conyers;Keith R. Helyar;Chris J. Lisle

  • 6 – Amelioration of Soil Acidity by Liming and other Amendments

    Unknown

  • Soil organic phosphorus and microbial community composition as affected by 26 years of different management strategies

    Else Bunemann;Else Bunemann;Petra Marschner;Ronald Smernik;Mark Conyers

  • Localised nitrate and phosphate application enhances root proliferation by wheat and maximises rhizosphere alkalisation in acid subsoil

    Chandrakumara. Weligama;Caixian. Tang;Peter Wykeham Gurney. Sale;Mark. Conyers

  • Biological amelioration of subsoil acidity through managing nitrate uptake by wheat crops

    Caixian Tang;Mark K. Conyers;M. Nuruzzaman;G. J. Poile

  • Predicting the response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to liquid and granular phosphorus fertilisers in Australian soils

    T.M. McBeath;M.J. McLaughlin;M.J. McLaughlin;R.D. Armstrong;M. Bell

  • Lime responses by barley as related to available soil aluminium and manganese

    M K Conyers;G J Poile;Brian R Cullis

  • Leaf cuticular waxes and physiological parameters in alfalfa leaves as influenced by drought

    Unknown

  • Managing wheat stubble as an effective approach to sequester soil carbon in a semi-arid environment: Spatial modelling

    De Li Liu;De Li Liu;Muhuddin R. Anwar;Muhuddin R. Anwar;Garry O'Leary;Mark K. Conyers;Mark K. Conyers

  • Modelling soil organic carbon 1. Performance of APSIM crop and pasture modules against long-term experimental data

    Garry J. O'Leary;De Li Liu;Yuchun Ma;Yuchun Ma;Frank Yonghong Li

  • Sensitivity of soil carbon to management and environmental factors within Australian perennial pasture systems

    Sue E. Orgill;Sue E. Orgill;Jason Condon;Mark Conyers;Richard Greene

  • A conceptual framework for improving the P efficiency of organic farming without inputs of soluble P fertiliser

    Unknown

  • Temporal variation in soil acidity

    M. K. Conyers;N. C. Uren;K. R. Helyar;G. J. Poile

  • Long-term benefits of limestone applications to soil properties and to cereal crop yields in southern and central New South Wales

    M. K. Conyers;C. L. Mullen;B. J. Scott;G. J. Poile

  • The strategic use of minimum tillage within conservation agriculture in southern New South Wales, Australia

    Mark Conyers;Vince van der Rijt;Albert Oates;Graeme Poile

  • Particle size determines the efficiency of calcitic limestone in amending acidic soil

    B. J. Scott;M. K. Conyers;R. Fisher;W. Lill

  • Confidence in soil carbon predictions undermined by the uncertainties in observations and model parameterisation

    Zhongkui Luo;Enli Wang;Quanxi Shao;Mark K. Conyers

  • Effects of lime on the botanical composition of pasture over nine years in a field experiment on the south-western slopes of New South Wales

    G. D. Li;K. R. Helyar;C. M. Evans;M. C. Wilson

  • Effect of ammonium, organic amendments, and plant growth on soil pH stratification

    C. M. Evans;M. K. Conyers;A. S. Black;G. J. Poile

  • Screening species and cultivars for their tolerance to acidic soil conditions.

    S. M. Ring;R. P. Fisher;G. J. Poile;K. R. Helyar

  • Unraveling microbiomes and functions associated with strategic tillage, stubble, and fertilizer management

    Yunying Fang;Lukas Van Zwieten;Michael T. Rose;Sotirios Vasileiadis

  • Lime improves emergence of canola on an acidic, hardsetting soil

    B. J. Scott;M. R. Fleming;M. K. Conyers;K. Y. Chan

  • The carbon cost of protecting the root apex from soil acidity : A theoretical framework

    Mark Conyers;Keith Helyar;J. Sergio Moroni

  • Proximal fluorescence sensing of potassium responsive crops to develop improved predictions of biomass, yield and grain quality of wheat and barley

    Jonathan Eddison Holland;Davide Cammarano;Glenn J. Fitzgerald;Eileen M. Perry

  • Soil potassium relationships, uptake efficiency and availability for six distinctive soils in central and southern New South Wales, Australia

    Jonathan Holland;Jonathan Holland;Mark Conyers;Beverley Orchard;Graeme Poile

  • Biomass, feed quality, mineral concentration and grain yield responses to potassium fertiliser of dual-purpose crops

    Jonathan E. Holland;Richard C. Hayes;Gordon Refshauge;Graeme J. Poile

  • Towards a More Productive and Sustainable Cropping System in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. I. Rice Production

    Jeffrey Evans;J. N. Jo;Y. G. Mun;Mark Conyers

  • Improving sustainable production of maize on upland soils of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

    Jeffrey Evans;J. N. Jo;Mark Conyers;Y. G. Mun

  • Is there room for strategic tillage in a no-till system?

    Mark Conyers;Yash Dang

Frequent Co-Authors

Yash Dang
Yash Dang University of Queensland
De Li Liu
De Li Liu University of New South Wales
Davide Cammarano
Davide Cammarano Aarhus University
Enzo Lombi
Enzo Lombi University of South Australia
Guangdi Li
Guangdi Li Central South University
Lukas Van Zwieten
Lukas Van Zwieten New South Wales Department of Primary Industries
John A. Kirkegaard
John A. Kirkegaard University of Western Australia
Ram C. Dalal
Ram C. Dalal University of Queensland
Garry O'Leary
Garry O'Leary University of Melbourne
Roger Armstrong
Roger Armstrong La Trobe University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark Conyers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles