World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margaret E. Billingham

Margaret E. Billingham

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
32129
World Ranking
14460
National Ranking
7313

Margaret E. Billingham publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret E. Billingham sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 288 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Margaret E. Billingham D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret E. Billingham sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margaret E. Billingham was affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily focused on engineering, with particular contributions in biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, and mechanics of materials.

The scientist's work covered several main research topics, including:

  • Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
  • Advanced machining processes and optimization
  • Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

One of the recent papers authored is titled Compression-Tolerant Mechanical Tubing Cutter with High Expansion Ratio and Real-Time Surface Readout, published in 2024 at the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition.

Frequent collaborators in their research included A. Z. Cygan and T. M. Osmond, who coauthored some of the work associated with Billingham.

Their findings were mainly published in the SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition venue.

Best Publications

  • Decreased catecholamine sensitivity and beta-adrenergic-receptor density in failing human hearts.

    Bristow Mr;Ginsburg R;Minobe W;Cubicciotti Rs

  • A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection: Heart Rejection Study Group. The International Society for Heart Transplantation.

    M. E. Billingham;N. R. B. Cary;M. E. Hammond;J. Kemnitz

  • A clinical trial of immunosuppressive therapy for myocarditis

    Jay W. Mason;John B. O'connell;Ahvie Herskowitz;Noel R. Rose

  • Heart-lung transplantation: successful therapy for patients with pulmonary vascular disease.

    Bruck A. Reitz;John L. Wallwork;Sharon A. Hunt;John L. Pennock

  • Antiatherogenic effects of L-arginine in the hypercholesterolemic rabbit.

    John P. Cooke;Alan H. Singer;Philip Tsao;Pauline Zera

  • Anthracycline cardiomyopathy monitored by morphologic changes.

    Billingham Me;Mason Jw;Bristow Mr;Daniels

  • Doxorubicin cardiomyopathy: evaluation by phonocardiography, endomyocardial biopsy, and cardiac catheterization.

    Michael R. Bristow;Jay W. Mason;Margaret E. Billingham;John R. Daniels

  • Post-transplant obliterative bronchiolitis and other late lung sequelae in human heart-lung transplantation.

    Conor M. Burke;James Theodore;Keith D. Dawkins;Samuel A. Yousem

  • Cardiac transplant atherosclerosis.

    Billingham Me

  • Early Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity

    Michael R. Bristow;Paul D. Thompson;Randolph P. Martin;Jay W. Mason

  • Structural changes in glutaraldehyde-treated porcine heterografts used as substitute cardiac valves: Transmission and scanning electron microscopic observations in 12 patients

    Victor J. Ferrans;Thomas L. Spray;Margaret E. Billingham;William C. Roberts

  • Treatment of acute inflammatory myocarditis assisted by endomyocardial biopsy

    Jay W. Mason;Margaret E. Billingham;Donald R. Ricci

  • Transplant coronary artery disease: histopathologic correlations with angiographic morphology.

    Danna E. Johnson;Edwin L. Alderman;John S. Schroeder;Shao-Zhou Gao

  • Intravascular ultrasound imaging of coronary arteries. Is three layers the norm

    P J Fitzgerald;F G St Goar;A J Connolly;F J Pinto

  • Calcific deposits in porcine bioprostheses: structure and pathogenesis.

    Victor J. Ferrans;Steven W. Boyce;Margaret E. Billingham;Michael Jones

  • Dose-effect and structure-function relationships in doxorubicin cardiomyopathy.

    Michael R Bristow;Jay W Mason;Margaret E Billingham;John R Daniels

  • Doxorubicin selectively inhibits muscle gene expression in cardiac muscle cells in vivo and in vitro.

    Hiroshi Ito;Steven C. Miller;Margaret E. Billingham;Hajime Akimoto

  • Clinical spectrum of anthracycline antibiotic cardiotoxicity.

    Bristow Mr;Billingham Me;Mason Jw;Daniels

  • Reduced Cardiotoxicity of Doxorubicin Delivered on a Weekly Schedule: Assessment by Endomyocardial Biopsy

    Frank M. Torti;Michael R. Bristow;Anthony E. Howes;Diana Aston

  • Treatment with rapamycin and mycophenolic acid reduces arterial intimal thickening produced by mechanical injury and allows endothelial replacement

    Clare R. Gregory;Xinfan Huang;Richard E. Pratt;Victor J. Dzau

Frequent Co-Authors

Norman E. Shumway
Norman E. Shumway Stanford University
Sharon A. Hunt
Sharon A. Hunt Stanford University
Michael R. Bristow
Michael R. Bristow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Edward B. Stinson
Edward B. Stinson Stanford University
Philip E. Oyer
Philip E. Oyer Stanford University
Richard L. Popp
Richard L. Popp Stanford University
Stuart W. Jamieson
Stuart W. Jamieson University of California, San Diego
John S. Schroeder
John S. Schroeder Stanford University
Bruce A. Reitz
Bruce A. Reitz Stanford University
Jan F. Gummert
Jan F. Gummert Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional, on-campus programs. Many students today explore online healthcare degrees for flexibility, affordability, and diverse career options. For those aiming to become advanced practice nurses, cheap np programs offer a cost-effective path to becoming a Nurse Practitioner while balancing work and family commitments.

The cost of nursing education is a frequent concern. Fortunately, there are resources to help determine how much is online nursing school and to compare tuition rates across accredited institutions. For registered nurses (RNs), advancing your education is possible with the cheapest rn to bsn programs, supporting long-term career growth and higher earning potential.

Those interested in leadership or teaching roles should consider doctorate in nursing education online programs. These advanced pathways enable dedicated nurses to shape the future of healthcare. Exploring these related online degrees can help you find the right and most affordable route for your career goals in medicine or nursing.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret E. Billingham

Recently Published Articles