World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
21994
World Ranking
19361
National Ranking
1746

John Wallwork publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Wallwork sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 437 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John Wallwork D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Wallwork sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

John Wallwork is a researcher affiliated with Papworth Hospital in the United Kingdom. Their work spans primarily the fields of Medicine and Engineering, with specific focus within Surgery and Biomedical Engineering.

Their main research topics include:

  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Wallwork has contributed to publications in notable venues, specifically The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Among their recent papers is the 2020 article titled Combined heart-lung transplantation from a donation after circulatory death donor, published in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation.

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Simon Messer
  • Yasir Abu-Omar
  • Stephen Large
  • Marius Berman
  • A. Page

John Wallwork has been recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Revision of the 1990 Working Formulation for the Standardization of Nomenclature in the Diagnosis of Heart Rejection

    Susan Stewart;Michael C. Fishbein;Gregory I. Snell;Gerald J. Berry

  • Inhaled Nitric Oxide as a Cause of Selective Pulmonary Vasodilatation in Pulmonary Hypertension

    J. Pepke-Zaba;T. W. Higenbottam;A. T. Dinh-Xuan;D. Stone

  • Heart-lung transplantation: successful therapy for patients with pulmonary vascular disease.

    Bruck A. Reitz;John L. Wallwork;Sharon A. Hunt;John L. Pennock

  • Impairment of Endothelium-Dependent Pulmonary-Artery Relaxation in Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

    Dinh-Xuan At;Higenbottam Tw;Clelland Ca;Pepke-Zaba J

  • Consensus conference report: maximizing use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor: cardiac recommendations, March 28-29, 2001, Crystal City, Va.

    Jonathan G. Zaroff;Bruce R. Rosengard;William F. Armstrong;Wayne D. Babcock

  • Transmyocardial laser revascularisation in patients with refractory angina: a randomised controlled trial.

    PM Schofield;LD Sharples;N Caine;S Burns

  • LONG-TERM TREATMENT OF PRIMARY PULMONARY HYPERTENSION WITH CONTINUOUS INTRAVENOUS EPOPROSTENOL (PROSTACYCLIN)

    Tim Higenbottam;Frank Wells;Derek Wheeldon;John Wallwork

  • Risk factors for bronchiolitis obliterans: a systematic review of recent publications.

    Linda D Sharples;Keith McNeil;Susan Stewart;John Wallwork

  • Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: incidence, natural history, prognosis, and risk factors

    D Heng;L D Sharples;K McNeil;S Stewart

  • Life-supporting pig-to-primate renal xenotransplantation using genetically modified donors.

    Afzal Zaidi;Michael Schmoeckel;Farah Bhatti;Paul Waterworth

  • Transforming the "unacceptable" donor: outcomes from the adoption of a standardized donor management technique.

    D. R. Wheeldon;C. D. O. Potter;A. Oduro;J. Wallwork

  • Transbronchial lung biopsy for the diagnosis of rejection in heart-lung transplant patients.

    Tim Higenbottam;Susan Stewart;Andrea Penketh;John Wallwork

  • Orthotopic heart transplantation in a transgenic pig-to-primate model.

    M Schmoeckel;F N Bhatti;A Zaidi;E Cozzi

  • Long-term survival of nonhuman primates receiving life-supporting transgenic porcine kidney xenografts.

    Emanuele Cozzi;Farah Bhatti;Michael Schmoeckel;Gilda Chavez

  • Assessment of survival benefit after lung transplantation by patient diagnosis.

    Susan C Charman;Linda D Sharples;Linda D Sharples;Keith D McNeil;John Wallwork

  • Prospective study of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting.

    N Caine;S C Harrison;L D Sharples;J Wallwork

  • Treatment of primary pulmonary hypertension intravenous epoprostenol (prostacyclin).

    D K Jones;T W Higenbottam;J Wallwork

  • Airway complications after lung transplantation: treatment and long-term outcome

    José M Herrera;Keith D McNeil;Robert S.D Higgins;Richard A Coulden

  • Risk factor analysis for the major hazards following heart transplantation--rejection, infection, and coronary occlusive disease.

    Linda D. Sharples;Noreen Caine;Paul Mullins;John P. Scott

  • Maximizing use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor: Cardiac recommendations

    Jonathan G. Zaroff;Bruce R. Rosengard;William F. Armstrong;Wayne D. Babcock

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda D. Sharples
Linda D. Sharples London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Peter J. Friend
Peter J. Friend University of Oxford
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Margaret E. Billingham
Margaret E. Billingham Stanford University
Bruce A. Reitz
Bruce A. Reitz Stanford University
Graeme J. M. Alexander
Graeme J. M. Alexander University College London
Sharon A. Hunt
Sharon A. Hunt Stanford University
David White
David White University of Southampton
Ming-Wei Wang
Ming-Wei Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Norman E. Shumway
Norman E. Shumway Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine doesn’t always mean becoming a physician. There are many flexible online degree options that support diverse roles in healthcare. For example, those interested in healthcare leadership can check out cahme-accredited online mha programs to develop advanced management skills and move into administrative positions.

Registered nurses (RN) wanting to advance can benefit from bridge programs such as rn to bsn no clinical hours, which allow for further qualification without the need for additional clinical rotations. Similarly, professionals seeking a terminal nursing degree may consider dnp online programs, some of which are designed to be completed in the shortest possible timeframes.

For those prioritizing convenience and flexibility, there are also dnp programs online that offer accelerated and accessible pathways to a Doctor of Nursing Practice qualification. These online options help meet the growing demand for leadership and specialized skills across the US healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing John Wallwork

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles