World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
M. Michael Cohen

M. Michael Cohen

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
27821
World Ranking
13643
National Ranking
562

M. Michael Cohen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Michael Cohen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 487 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

M. Michael Cohen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Michael Cohen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Michael Cohen is affiliated with Dalhousie University in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Their work also spans Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Control and Systems Engineering, and Signal Processing.

The research topics covered by Cohen include:

  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Noise Effects and Management

Cohen has published research in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • SHS Web of Conferences
  • AIP Conference Proceedings
  • International Journal of Entertainment Technology and Management
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Some of Cohen's recent publications include:

  • "One shot 3D photography," 2020, ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "Clinical and functional efficacy of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis carrying the N1303K mutation," 2023, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • "Person identification from EEG using various machine learning techniques with inter-hemispheric amplitude ratio," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Examining Blockchain Protocols, Cryptocurrency, NFTs, and Other Web 3.0 Affordances in Teacher Education," 2022, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education
  • "VR Drumming Pedagogy: Action Observation, Virtual Co-Embodiment, and Development of Drumming "Halvatar"," 2023, Electronics

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Michael Wilschanski
  • James Pinkl
  • Peter Kudry
  • William L. Martens
  • Ayelet Gamliel

Best Publications

  • Syndromes of the Head and Neck

    Raoul C. M. Hennekam;R. J. Gorlin;M. M. Cohen

  • Syndromes of the Head and Neck.

    Robert J. Gorlin;Michael M. Cohen;Stefan L. Levin

  • Craniosynostosis : diagnosis, evaluation, and management

    M. Michael Cohen;Samuel Pruzansky

  • The hedgehog signaling network

    M. Michael Cohen

  • Proteus syndrome: diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, and patient evaluation.

    Leslie G. Biesecker;Rudolf Happle;John B. Mulliken;Rosanna Weksberg

  • Sutural biology and the correlates of craniosynostosis

    M. Michael Cohen

  • A unique point mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene (FGFR3) defines a new craniosynostosis syndrome.

    M Muenke;K W Gripp;D M McDonald-McGinn;K Gaudenz

  • The new bone biology: pathologic, molecular, and clinical correlates.

    M. Michael Cohen

  • Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome.

    Robert J. Gorlin;M. Michael Cohen;Lawrence M. Condon;Lawrence M. Condon;Barbara A. Burke

  • Perspectives on holoprosencephaly: Part I. Epidemiology, genetics, and syndromology.

    M. Michael Cohen

  • Mutations in FGFR1 and FGFR2 cause familial and sporadic Pfeiffer syndrome

    Ute Schell;Andreas Hehr;George J. Feldman;Nathaniel H. Robin

  • Pfeiffer syndrome update, clinical subtypes, and guidelines for differential diagnosis

    M. Michael Cohen

  • Reassessment of the Proteus syndrome literature: application of diagnostic criteria to published cases.

    Joyce T. Turner;M. Michael Cohen;Leslie G. Biesecker

  • Birth prevalence study of the apert syndrome

    Cohen Mm;Kreiborg S;Lammer Ej;Cordero Jf

  • Perspectives on holoprosencephaly: Part III. Spectra, distinctions, continuities, and discontinuities.

    M. Michael Cohen

  • Holoprosencephaly: clinical, anatomic, and molecular dimensions.

    M. Michael Cohen

  • ACE Inhibitor Fetopathy and Hypocalvaria: The Kidney-Skull Connection

    Mason Barr;M. Michael Cohen

  • Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 mutations in Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome

    Kelly A. Przylepa;William Paznekas;Minghuang Zhang;Mahin Golabi

  • Teratogenesis of holoprosencephaly.

    M. Michael Cohen;Kohei Shiota

  • The central nervous system in the Apert syndrome.

    M. Michael Cohen;Sven Kreiborg

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Gorlin
Robert J. Gorlin University of Minnesota
Maximilian Muenke
Maximilian Muenke American College of Medical Genetics
Elaine H. Zackai
Elaine H. Zackai Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Leslie G. Biesecker
Leslie G. Biesecker National Institutes of Health
Ethylin Wang Jabs
Ethylin Wang Jabs Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
John C. Carey
John C. Carey University of Utah
John B. Mulliken
John B. Mulliken Boston Children's Hospital
John M. Graham
John M. Graham Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Rosanna Weksberg
Rosanna Weksberg University of Toronto
Stanley M. Garn
Stanley M. Garn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering alternatives or complementary pathways to studying Medicine in the USA, exploring online healthcare degrees offers flexible and accessible options. Many students are interested in finding whats the easiest nursing program to get into?—especially programs with flexible admission requirements or streamlined curriculums. These nursing programs can be a practical starting point for a healthcare career.

For those seeking administrative roles, online health administration programs provide a fast-track to leadership positions in hospitals and clinics. Another in-demand field is medical billing and coding, where students can access quality education through schools offering financial aid for medical billing and coding. This makes it easier for prospective students to begin a career in healthcare without overwhelming financial strain.

Additionally, some students prefer programs that reduce entrance barriers. You can find nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams, simplifying the application process. These pathways collectively offer valuable alternatives for students passionate about health but seeking different routes to enter the field.

Best Scientists Citing M. Michael Cohen

Recently Published Articles