World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Leonard H. van den Berg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leonard H. van den Berg between 1955 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leonard H. van den Berg published across 71 years, from 1955 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2021. 28 of the 436 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2021. 1955: 1 publication 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 1 publication 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 37 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 15 publications
1955 2025

436 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leonard H. van den Berg: publications per year, 1955 to 2025
Year Publications
1955 1
1956 0
1957 0
1958 1
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 2
1996 3
1997 3
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 4
2003 7
2004 9
2005 10
2006 5
2007 10
2008 13
2009 16
2010 21
2011 20
2012 27
2013 20
2014 22
2015 21
2016 27
2017 17
2018 18
2019 24
2020 28
2021 37
2022 15
2023 9
2024 13
2025 15
Total 436
Download as CSV

Leonard H. van den Berg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard H. van den Berg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Leonard H. van den Berg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard H. van den Berg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Leonard H. van den Berg is affiliated with the University Medical Center Utrecht in the Netherlands. Their work primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong emphasis on neurology and related subfields. This includes research in neurology, genetics, molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and clinical psychology.

The main research topics addressed by Leonard H. van den Berg include amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) research, neurogenetic and muscular disorders research, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, neurological diseases and metabolism, prion diseases and protein misfolding, biochemical acid research studies, and epigenetics and DNA methylation.

Their published work appears frequently in a range of scientific venues, with numerous publications in:

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
  • Neurology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neurology
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Leonard H. van den Berg include:

  • "TDP-43 proteinopathies: a new wave of neurodegenerative diseases" (2020), Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • "Genome-wide association study of intracranial aneurysms identifies 17 risk loci and genetic overlap with clinical risk factors" (2020), Nature Genetics
  • "Muscle strength and motor function in adolescents and adults with spinal muscular atrophy" (2020), Neurology
  • "Meta-analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation identifies shared associations across neurodegenerative disorders" (2021), Genome Biology
  • "Population-based analysis of survival in spinal muscular atrophy" (2020), Neurology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Jan H. Veldink
  • Philip Van Damme
  • Ruben P. A. van Eijk
  • Ammar Al-Chalabi
  • Orla Hardiman

Leonard H. van den Berg's research intersects multidisciplinary fields combining clinical neurology with molecular biology and genetics, contributing to the understanding of neurodegenerative diseases, particularly ALS and spinal muscular atrophy. The extensive publication record and diverse range of topics reflect ongoing investigations into genetic factors and molecular mechanisms underlying neurological disorders.

Best Publications

  • Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations

    Harm-Jan Westra;Marjolein J Peters;Tõnu Esko;Hanieh Yaghootkar

  • Meta-analysis identifies 29 additional ulcerative colitis risk loci, increasing the number of confirmed associations to 47.

    Carl A. Anderson;Gabrielle Boucher;Charlie W. Lees;Andre Franke

  • Multiple common variants for celiac disease influencing immune gene expression

    Patrick C. A. Dubois;Gosia Trynka;Lude Franke;Lude Franke;Karen A. Hunt

  • Exome sequencing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identifies risk genes and pathways

    Elizabeth T. Cirulli;Brittany N Lasseigne;Slave Petrovski;Peter C Sapp

  • Genome-wide Analyses Identify KIF5A as a Novel ALS Gene.

    Aude Nicolas;Kevin P. Kenna;Alan E. Renton;Alan E. Renton;Nicola Ticozzi

  • Whole-genome sequence variation, population structure and demographic history of the Dutch population

    Laurent C. Francioli;Androniki Menelaou;Sara L. Pulit;Freerk van Dijk

  • Controversies and priorities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Martin R Turner;Orla Hardiman;Michael Benatar;Benjamin R Brooks

  • The genetics and neuropathology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Ammar Al-Chalabi;Ashley Jones;Claire Troakes;Claire Troakes;Andrew King;Andrew King

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 19p13.3 (UNC13A) and 9p21.2 as susceptibility loci for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

    Michael A van Es;Jan H Veldink;Christiaan G J Saris;Hylke M Blauw

  • Disease variants alter transcription factor levels and methylation of their binding sites.

    Marc Jan Bonder;René Luijk;Daria V Zhernakova;Matthijs Moed

  • Identification of context-dependent expression quantitative trait loci in whole blood

    Daria V Zhernakova;Patrick Deelen;Martijn Vermaat;Maarten van Iterson

  • Exome-wide rare variant analysis identifies TUBA4A mutations associated with familial ALS.

    B N Smith;N Ticozzi;C Fallini;A S Gkazi

  • Genetic and environmental influences interact with age and sex in shaping the human methylome

    Jenny van Dongen;Michel G. Nivard;Gonneke Willemsen;Jouke-Jan Hottenga

  • Analysis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as a multistep process: a population-based modelling study

    Ammar Al-Chalabi;Andrea Calvo;Adriano Chio;Shuna Colville

  • Common variants in 22 loci are associated with QRS duration and cardiac ventricular conduction.

    Nona Sotoodehnia;Aaron Isaacs;Paul I W de Bakker;Marcus Dörr

  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: moving towards a new classification system

    Ammar Al-Chalabi;Orla Hardiman;Matthew C Kiernan;Adriano Chiò

  • Evidence for an oligogenic basis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Marka van Blitterswijk;Michael A. van Es;Eric A.M. Hennekam;Dennis Dooijes

  • A randomized sequential trial of creatine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Geert Jan Groeneveld;Jan H. Veldink;Ingeborg van der Tweel;Sandra Kalmijn

  • EPHA4 is a disease modifier of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in animal models and in humans

    Annelies Van Hoecke;Lies Schoonaert;Robin Lemmens;Mieke Timmers

  • Variants of the elongator protein 3 (ELP3) gene are associated with motor neuron degeneration

    Claire L. Simpson;Robin Lemmens;Robin Lemmens;Katarzyna Miskiewicz;Katarzyna Miskiewicz;Wendy J. Broom

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan H. Veldink
Jan H. Veldink Utrecht University
Orla Hardiman
Orla Hardiman Trinity College Dublin
Cisca Wijmenga
Cisca Wijmenga University Medical Center Groningen
Ammar Al-Chalabi
Ammar Al-Chalabi King's College London
Lude Franke
Lude Franke University Medical Center Groningen
Martijn P. van den Heuvel
Martijn P. van den Heuvel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Aaron Isaacs
Aaron Isaacs Maastricht University
Roel A. Ophoff
Roel A. Ophoff University of California, Los Angeles
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but are exploring alternate routes, many online degree options offer flexibility and promising pathways. For those interested in patient care, nursing programs without TEAS can provide a streamlined entry into the nursing field, removing standardized test barriers for eligible students.

Healthcare leadership roles are in demand, and healthcare administration degree programs online enable aspiring administrators to develop essential managerial skills at an accelerated pace. If you’re a registered nurse wanting to advance your clinical skills, ADN to FNP bridge programs offer a direct pathway toward becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, helping you expand your career scope while studying remotely.

Additionally, nutrition science is a vital field within healthcare. Pursuing a nutrition bachelor degree online can lead to roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, and public health. Each of these online pathways can complement or extend a traditional medical career, helping you tailor your education to your interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Leonard H. van den Berg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles