World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
José M. López-Novoa

José M. López-Novoa

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 72 19847 18614 285 280 421 18252

José M. López-Novoa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by José M. López-Novoa between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. José M. López-Novoa published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2010. 1 of the 502 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2010. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 6 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 17 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1968 2025

502 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
José M. López-Novoa: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 6
1978 5
1979 2
1980 6
1981 5
1982 8
1983 0
1984 6
1985 9
1986 11
1987 10
1988 17
1989 14
1990 11
1991 12
1992 9
1993 6
1994 5
1995 10
1996 7
1997 11
1998 15
1999 14
2000 6
2001 12
2002 14
2003 5
2004 7
2005 13
2006 19
2007 15
2008 20
2009 10
2010 28
2011 14
2012 14
2013 25
2014 12
2015 19
2016 16
2017 16
2018 6
2019 23
2020 5
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 502
Download as CSV

José M. López-Novoa publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José M. López-Novoa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 421 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 421
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

José M. López-Novoa D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José M. López-Novoa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391 72
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

José M. López-Novoa is affiliated with the University of Salamanca in Spain. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine, with a focus on molecular biology, nephrology, obstetrics and gynecology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and epidemiology. The body of work consists of 12 publications in medicine and 4 in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work addresses diverse topics that include pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, angiogenesis and VEGF in cancer, TGF-β signaling in diseases, cancer, hypoxia and metabolism, acute kidney injury research, chronic kidney disease and diabetes, and dialysis and renal disease management.

Recent significant publications by José M. López-Novoa include:

  • Continuous endoglin (CD105) overexpression disrupts angiogenesis and facilitates tumor cell metastasis, 2020, Angiogenesis
  • Impaired Tubular Reabsorption Is the Main Mechanism Explaining Increases in Urinary NGAL Excretion Following Acute Kidney Injury in Rats, 2020, Toxicological Sciences
  • Potential Role of Circulating Endoglin in Hypertension via the Upregulated Expression of BMP4, 2020, Cells
  • Pregnancy-Induced High Plasma Levels of Soluble Endoglin in Mice Lead to Preeclampsia Symptoms and Placental Abnormalities, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Functional Alterations Involved in Increased Bleeding in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Mouse Models, 2022, Frontiers in Medicine

Frequent coauthors include Miguel Pericacho, Alicia Rodríguez-Barbero, Carmelo Bernabéu, Claudia Ollauri-Ibáñez, and Elena Núñez-Gómez. Collaborations with these researchers have resulted in multiple joint publications.

Publication venues where José M. López-Novoa has contributed include:

  • Angiogenesis
  • Toxicological Sciences
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Cells
  • Frontiers in Medicine

The research contributed by José M. López-Novoa covers molecular mechanisms and pathological processes relevant to kidney injury, vascular biology, and pregnancy-related conditions, among others. This multidisciplinary approach integrates clinical and molecular insights within their research scope.

Best Publications

  • New insights into the mechanism of aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity: an integrative point of view

    Jose M. Lopez-Novoa;Yaremi Quiros;Laura Vicente;Ana I. Morales

  • Inflammation and EMT: an alliance towards organ fibrosis and cancer progression

    Jose Miguel López-Novoa;M Angela Nieto

  • Snail1-induced partial epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition drives renal fibrosis in mice and can be targeted to reverse established disease

    M Teresa Grande;Berta Sánchez-Laorden;Cristina López-Blau;Cristina A De Frutos

  • Role of TGF-β in chronic kidney disease: an integration of tubular, glomerular and vascular effects

    Francisco J. López-Hernández;Jose M. López-Novoa

  • The emerging role of TGF-β superfamily coreceptors in cancer

    Carmelo Bernabeu;Jose M. Lopez-Novoa;Miguel Quintanilla

  • Glomerular nephrotoxicity of aminoglycosides.

    Carlos Martínez-Salgado;Francisco J. López-Hernández;José M. López-Novoa

  • Metformin prevents experimental gentamicin-induced nephropathy by a mitochondria-dependent pathway

    Ana I. Morales;Dominique Detaille;Marta Prieto;Angel Puente

  • Fibroblast activation and myofibroblast generation in obstructive nephropathy

    María T. Grande;José M. López-Novoa

  • An Integrative Overview on the Mechanisms Underlying the Renal Tubular Cytotoxicity of Gentamicin

    Yaremi Quiros;Laura Vicente-Vicente;Ana I Morales;José M López-Novoa

  • The physiological role of endoglin in the cardiovascular system.

    José M. López-Novoa;Carmelo Bernabeu

  • An integrative view of the pathophysiological events leading to cisplatin nephrotoxicity

    Penélope D Sánchez-González;Francisco J López-Hernández;José M López-Novoa;Ana I Morales

  • Protective effect of quercetin on experimental chronic cadmium nephrotoxicity in rats is based on its antioxidant properties.

    A.I. Morales;C. Vicente-Sánchez;J.M. Santiago Sandoval;J. Egido

  • Etiopathology of chronic tubular, glomerular and renovascular nephropathies: Clinical implications

    José M López-Novoa;José M López-Novoa;Ana B Rodríguez-Peña;Alberto Ortiz;Carlos Martínez-Salgado

  • In vivo bradykinin B2 receptor activation reduces renal fibrosis

    Joost P. Schanstra;Eric Neau;Pascale Drogoz;Miguel A. Arevalo Gomez

  • Endoglin regulates nitric oxide-dependent vasodilatation

    Mirjana Jerkic;Juan V. Rivas-Elena;Marta Prieto;Rosalía Carrón

  • Common pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic kidney disease: Therapeutic perspectives

    José M. López-Novoa;Carlos Martínez-Salgado;Ana B. Rodríguez-Peña;Francisco J. López Hernández

  • Role of inflammation in túbulo-interstitial damage associated to obstructive nephropathy

    María T Grande;María T Grande;Fernando Pérez-Barriocanal;Fernando Pérez-Barriocanal;José M López-Novoa;José M López-Novoa

  • Endothelial endoglin is involved in inflammation: role in leukocyte adhesion and transmigration

    Elisa Rossi;Francisco Sanz-Rodriguez;Nélida Eleno;Annette Düwell

  • Quercetin reduces cisplatin nephrotoxicity in rats without compromising its anti-tumour activity

    Penelope D. Sanchez-Gonzalez;Francisco J. Lopez-Hernandez;Fernando Perez-Barriocanal;Ana I. Morales

  • An integrative view on the role of TGF-β in the progressive tubular deletion associated with chronic kidney disease

    Omar García-Sánchez;Francisco J. López-Hernández;José M. López-Novoa

Frequent Co-Authors

Carmelo Bernabeu
Carmelo Bernabeu Spanish National Research Council
Ana Olivera
Ana Olivera National Institutes of Health
Eugenio Santos
Eugenio Santos University of Salamanca
Santiago Lamas
Santiago Lamas Spanish National Research Council
Miguel Quintanilla
Miguel Quintanilla Spanish National Research Council
Michelle Letarte
Michelle Letarte University of Toronto
Atanasio Pandiella
Atanasio Pandiella Spanish National Research Council
Alberto Ortiz
Alberto Ortiz Autonomous University of Madrid
Marta Ruiz-Ortega
Marta Ruiz-Ortega Autonomous University of Madrid
Giovanni Camussi
Giovanni Camussi University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering alternative pathways in the healthcare field? There are a wide range of online degrees and certifications that open doors to growing medical careers, many of which can be completed more quickly or affordably than a traditional MD.

For those drawn to pharmacy, pharmd online programs offer a flexible way to gain the advanced knowledge needed to become a licensed pharmacist. If you’re interested in managing patient data and supporting healthcare operations, a him degree online will prepare you for in-demand roles in health information management.

Administrative careers continue to grow as well. Earning credentials through online medical billing and coding courses can quickly qualify you for jobs in medical offices, insurance companies, and hospitals. Interested in advanced clinical roles without pursuing a full medical degree? Explore the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs to advance your nursing career and expand your scope of practice.

These online options make it easier to begin or enhance a rewarding healthcare career from the comfort of your own home.

Best Scientists Citing José M. López-Novoa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles