World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
10820
World Ranking
6596
National Ranking
3582

Jon R. Star publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon R. Star sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jon R. Star D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon R. Star sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon R. Star is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences, mathematics, and psychology, with notable contributions to education and cognitive studies.

The main areas of study include education, statistics and probability, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and social psychology. Their work addresses several key topics such as cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, mathematics education and teaching techniques, science education and pedagogy, education, achievement and giftedness, education and technology integration, visual and cognitive learning processes, and innovative teaching and learning methods.

Jon R. Star has published extensively in various academic venues. The frequent publication venues where their work appears include:

  • ZDM
  • International Journal of STEM Education
  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Asian Journal for Mathematics Education
  • Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática

Their recent papers reflect a focus on mathematics education and cognitive processes. Some notable recent publications are:

  • "Word problems in mathematics education: a survey," 2020, ZDM
  • "A systematic review of high impact empirical studies in STEM education," 2022, International Journal of STEM Education
  • "Expertise in developing students' expertise in mathematics: Bridging teachers' professional knowledge and instructional quality," 2020, ZDM
  • "How mathematics anxiety affects students' inflexible perseverance in mathematics problem-solving: Examining the mediating role of cognitive reflection," 2020, British Journal of Educational Psychology
  • "Comparing and Discussing Multiple Strategies: An Approach to Improving Algebra Instruction," 2021, The Journal of Experimental Education

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Ru-De Liu, Ronghuan Jiang, Wei Hong, Kelley Durkin, and Bethany Rittle-Johnson. These coauthors have contributed collectively to multiple studies, indicating sustained collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice

    Jon R. Star;Sharon K. Strickland

  • Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge.

    Jon R. Star

  • Assisting Students Struggling with Mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for Elementary and Middle Schools. NCEE 2009-4060.

    Russell Gersten;Sybilla Beckmann;Benjamin Clarke;Anne Foegen

  • Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations.

    Bethany Rittle-Johnson;Jon R. Star

  • Compared with What? The Effects of Different Comparisons on Conceptual Knowledge and Procedural Flexibility for Equation Solving.

    Bethany Rittle-Johnson;Jon R. Star

  • Not a One-Way Street: Bidirectional Relations Between Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge of Mathematics

    Bethany Rittle-Johnson;Michael Schneider;Jon R. Star

  • The Importance of Prior Knowledge When Comparing Examples: Influences on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Equation Solving

    Bethany Rittle-Johnson;Jon R. Star;Kelley Durkin

  • Word problems in mathematics education: a survey

    Lieven Verschaffel;Stanislaw Schukajlow;Jon Star;Wim Van Dooren

  • Relations among conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and procedural flexibility in two samples differing in prior knowledge.

    Michael Schneider;Bethany Rittle-Johnson;Jon R. Star

  • Flexibility in Problem Solving: The Case of Equation Solving.

    Jon R. Star;Bethany Rittle-Johnson

  • Flexible and adaptive use of strategies and representations in mathematics education

    Aiso Heinze;John R. Star;Lieven Verschaffel

  • Children's interpretation of generic noun phrases.

    Michelle A. Hollander;Susan A. Gelman;Jon Star

  • It pays to compare: an experimental study on computational estimation.

    Jon R. Star;Bethany Rittle-Johnson

  • Improving Seventh Grade Students' Learning of Ratio and Proportion: The Role of Schema-Based Instruction.

    Asha K. Jitendra;Jon R. Star;Kristin Starosta;Jayne M. Leh

  • Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge: Exploring the Gap Between Knowledge Type and Knowledge Quality

    Jon R. Star;Gabriel J. Stylianides

  • Using video to improve mathematics' teachers' abilities to attend to classroom features: A replication study

    Jon R Star;Kathleen Helen Lynch;Natasha Perova

  • Encouraging girls in math and science

    Diane F. Halpern;Joshua Aronson;Nona Reimer;Sandra Simpkins

  • The development of flexibility in equation solving

    Jon R. Star;Colleen Seifert

  • Teaching Mathematics for Understanding: An Analysis of Lessons Submitted by Teachers Seeking NBPTS Certification

    Edward A. Silver;Vilma M. Mesa;Katherine A. Morris;Jon R. Star

  • Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools.

    Russell Gersten;Sybilla Beckmann;Benjamin Clarke;Anne Foegen

Frequent Co-Authors

Bethany Rittle-Johnson
Bethany Rittle-Johnson Vanderbilt University
Asha K. Jitendra
Asha K. Jitendra University of California, Riverside
Chris Dede
Chris Dede Harvard University
Susan A. Gelman
Susan A. Gelman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kathryn R. Wentzel
Kathryn R. Wentzel University of Maryland, College Park
Joshua Aronson
Joshua Aronson New York University
Sandra D. Simpkins
Sandra D. Simpkins University of California, Irvine
Russell Gersten
Russell Gersten University of Oregon
Diane F. Halpern
Diane F. Halpern Claremont McKenna College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up a broad range of online degree options and rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue Bachelor’s or Master’s degrees in Psychology as a foundation for professions such as counseling, therapy, or social work.

Social work is a particularly popular field connected to psychology studies. Each state has unique requirements for licensure, which often include a relevant degree, clinical experience, and state-specific exams. Learn more about specific paths by reading about becoming a social worker in Florida, becoming a social worker in Georgia, and becoming a social worker in Hawaii.

Online programs allow you to complete coursework from anywhere, making it easier to balance studies with other life commitments. Those interested in social work should also review the process of how to become a social worker in Idaho, since requirements may differ but often share a core emphasis on accredited education and supervised practice.

By exploring these online programs and requirements, you can choose a pathway that suits your career goals and geographic needs.

Best Scientists Citing Jon R. Star

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles