World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
4883
World Ranking
8449
National Ranking
106

JoLynn Carroll publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where JoLynn Carroll sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 111 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

JoLynn Carroll D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where JoLynn Carroll sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Error in OpenAI API call: Error code: 500 - {'error': {'message': 'The server had an error while processing your request. Sorry about that!', 'type': 'server_error', 'param': None, 'code': None}}

Best Publications

  • A genomic catalog of Earth’s microbiomes

    Stephen Nayfach;Simon Roux;Rekha Seshadri;Daniel Udwary

  • Historical trends in persistent organic pollutants and metals recorded in sediment from Lake Ellasjøen, Bjørnøya, Norwegian Arctic.

    A. Evenset;G.N. Christensen;J. Carroll;A. Zaborska

  • Postglacial response of Arctic Ocean gas hydrates to climatic amelioration

    Pavel Serov;Sunil Vadakkepuliyambatta;Jurgen Mienert;Henry Patton

  • The role of the Ganges-Brahmaputra mixing zone in supplying barium and226Ra to the Bay of Bengal

    Jolynn Carroll;Jolynn Carroll;kelly Kenison Falkner;Erik Thorson Brown;Willard S. Moore

  • Intercomparison of alpha and gamma spectrometry techniques used in 210Pb geochronology

    Agata Zaborska;JoLynn Carroll;Carlo Papucci;Janusz Pempkowiak

  • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Sediments of the White Sea, Russia

    Vladimir M Savinov;Tatiana N Savinova;JoLynn Carroll;Gennady G Matishov

  • The Arctic seas

    Michael L. Carroll;JoLynn Carroll

  • Seabird guano is an efficient conveyer of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) to arctic lake ecosystems

    A Evenset;J Carroll;G N Christensen;R Kallenborn

  • Intra-regional comparison of productivity, carbon flux and ecosystem composition within the northern Barents Sea

    Marit Reigstad;JoLynn Carroll;Dag Slagstad;Ingrid Ellingsen

  • Seepage from an arctic shallow marine gas hydrate reservoir is insensitive to momentary ocean warming

    Wei-Li Hong;Marta E Torres;JoLynn Carroll;Antoine Crémière

  • Effects of drill cuttings on biogeochemical fluxes and macrobenthos of marine sediments

    Morten Thorne Schaanning;Hilde Cecilie Trannum;Sigurd Øxnevad;JoLynn Carroll

  • PCBs, PBDEs and pesticides released to the Arctic Ocean by the Russian rivers Ob and Yenisei.

    JoLynn Carroll;Vladimir Savinov;Tatiana Savinova;Salve Dahle

  • Methane cold seeps as biological oases in the high‐Arctic deep sea

    Emmelie K. L. Åström;Michael L. Carroll;William G. Ambrose;Arunima Sen

  • Recent sediment accumulation rates for the Western margin of the Barents Sea

    Agata Zaborska;JoLynn Carroll;Carlo Papucci;Leonardo Torricelli

  • Radionuclide Bioconcentration Factors and Sediment Partition Coefficients in Arctic Seas Subject to Contamination from Dumped Nuclear Wastes

    Nicholas S. Fisher;Scott W. Fowler;Florence Boisson;JoLynn Carroll

  • Uranium removal during low discharge in the Ganges-Brahmaputra mixing zone

    JoLynn Carroll;Willard S. Moore

  • Carbon flux and ecosystem feedback in the northern Barents Sea in an era of climate change: An introduction

    P. Wassmann;J. Carroll;R.G.J. Bellerby

  • Input of organic carbon as determinant of nutrient fluxes, light climate and productivity in the Ob and Yenisey estuaries

    Dag O. Hessen;JoLynn Carroll;Berit Kjeldstad;Anton A. Korosov

  • Monitoring marine mammals using unmanned aerial vehicles: quantifying detection certainty

    Ana Sofia Aniceto;Martin Biuw;Ulf Lindstrøm;Stian Solbø

  • Potential effects of temperature on the benthic infaunal community on the southeastern Bering Sea shelf: Possible impacts of climate change

    K.O. Coyle;B. Konar;A. Blanchard;R.C. Highsmith

  • Bioaccumulation of phenanthrene and benzo[a]pyrene in Calanus finmarchicus.

    Louise Kiel Jensen;Jani O. Honkanen;Iris Jæger;JoLynn Carroll

  • Benthic community response to petroleum-associated components in Arctic versus temperate marine sediments

    Gro Harlaug Olsen;Michael L. Carroll;Paul E. Renaud;William G. Ambrose

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael L. Carroll
Michael L. Carroll University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
William G. Ambrose
William G. Ambrose Coastal Carolina University
Katrine Husum
Katrine Husum Norwegian Polar Institute
Wei-Li Hong
Wei-Li Hong Stockholm University
Helge Niemann
Helge Niemann Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Morten Hald
Morten Hald University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Janet K. Jansson
Janet K. Jansson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Janusz Pempkowiak
Janusz Pempkowiak Polish Academy of Sciences
Ketil Hylland
Ketil Hylland University of Oslo
Bernard Henrissat
Bernard Henrissat Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities and enhance expertise in the field. Programs offering a low cost online general studies degree provide a flexible and budget-friendly option for those looking to build a broad academic foundation before specializing.

If you prefer a streamlined academic experience, considering an easy bachelor's degree online may help balance study with other commitments, allowing you to progress efficiently toward your environmental career goals.

For technical roles within Environmental Sciences, degrees such as the geologist degree online offer specialized training in earth systems, which is critical for understanding environmental impacts and resource management.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly important in environmental analysis. Pursuing one of the best GIS graduate programs online equips students with mapping and spatial data tools essential to many environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing JoLynn Carroll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles