World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5856 5443 279 268 96 11797

Sietse F. de Boer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sietse F. de Boer between 1989 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sietse F. de Boer published across 36 years, from 1989 to 2024, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2013. 2 of the 107 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2013. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1989 2024

107 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sietse F. de Boer: publications per year, 1989 to 2024
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 4
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 0
2003 6
2004 1
2005 5
2006 1
2007 5
2008 3
2009 6
2010 2
2011 1
2012 3
2013 8
2014 5
2015 6
2016 5
2017 6
2018 3
2019 4
2020 5
2021 4
2022 6
2023 1
2024 1
Total 107
Download as CSV

Sietse F. de Boer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sietse F. de Boer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 96
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sietse F. de Boer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sietse F. de Boer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sietse F. de Boer is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands and has a research focus spanning multiple fields including neuroscience, psychology, and medicine. Their work addresses key topics such as neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, stress responses and cortisol, and the effects of vibration on health. The scientist's contributions also extend into areas like circadian rhythm and melatonin, autism spectrum disorder research, noise effects and management, and neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior.

De Boer's recent publications illustrate a broad engagement with behavioral and cognitive neuroscience. Notable papers include:

  • "Translational validity and methodological underreporting in animal research: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Fragile X syndrome (Fmr1 KO) rodent model" (2022), published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Social withdrawal: An initially adaptive behavior that becomes maladaptive when expressed excessively" (2020), published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Whole Body Vibration Improves Spatial Memory, Anxiety-Like Behavior, and Motor Performance in Aged Male and Female Rats" (2022), published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • "Pharmacological Studies on the Role of 5-HT1A Receptors in Male Sexual Behavior of Wildtype and Serotonin Transporter Knockout Rats" (2020), published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • "The human neuropsychiatric risk gene Drd2 is necessary for social functioning across evolutionary distant species" (2023), published in Molecular Psychiatry

Frequent coauthors in de Boer's work include Bauke Buwalda, Martien J. Kas, Kevin G.O. Ike, Tamás Oroszi, and Regien G. Schoemaker, demonstrating collaborative efforts across multiple projects. These collaborations have contributed significantly to research outputs, visible in several publications across consistent venues.

De Boer's work has been published repeatedly in the following journals:

  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Molecular Psychiatry

The scientist's key areas of study can be categorized into primary fields such as:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these, de Boer focuses on subfields including:

  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Best Publications

  • Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology.

    J.M Koolhaas;S.M Korte;S.F De Boer;B.J Van Der Vegt

  • Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: towards underlying mechanisms

    Caroline M. Coppens;Sietse F. de Boer;Jaap M. Koolhaas

  • Individual variation in coping with stress : A multidimensional approach of ultimate and proximate mechanisms

    Jaap M. Koolhaas;Sietse F. de Boer;Bauke Buwalda;Kees van Reenen

  • Defensive burying in rodents: ethology, neurobiology and psychopharmacology

    Sietse F. De Boer;Jaap M. Koolhaas

  • The resident-intruder paradigm: a standardized test for aggression, violence and social stress.

    Jaap M. Koolhaas;Caroline M. Coppens;Sietse F. de Boer;Bauke Buwalda

  • 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor agonists and aggression: a pharmacological challenge of the serotonin deficiency hypothesis.

    Sietse F. de Boer;Jaap M. Koolhaas

  • Long-term effects of social stress on brain and behavior: a focus on hippocampal functioning

    Bauke Buwalda;Maarten H.P. Kole;Alexa H. Veenema;Mark Huininga

  • A robust animal model of state anxiety: fear-potentiated behaviour in the elevated plus-maze.

    S. Mechiel Korte;Sietse F. De Boer

  • Neurobiology of escalated aggression and violence.

    Klaus A. Miczek;Renan Moritz Varnier Rodrigues de Almeida;E. A. Kravitz;Emilie F. Rissman

  • Individual variation in aggression of feral rodent strains: a standard for the genetics of aggression and violence?

    Sietse F. de Boer;Bea J. van der Vegt;Jaap M. Koolhaas

  • Individual Differences in Plasma Catecholamine and Corticosterone Stress Responses of Wild-Type Rats: Relationship With Aggression

    Andrea Sgoifo;Sietse F De Boer;Jozsef Haller;Jaap M Koolhaas

  • Incidence of arrhythmias and heart rate variability in wild-type rats exposed to social stress

    A. Sgoifo;S.F. de Boer;C. Westenbroek;Frans W. Maes

  • Untangling the neurobiology of coping styles in rodents: Towards neural mechanisms underlying individual differences in disease susceptibility

    Sietse F. de Boer;Bauke Buwalda;Jaap M. Koolhaas

  • Serotonin transporter deficiency in rats improves inhibitory control but not behavioural flexibility

    Judith R. Homberg;Tommy Pattij;Mieke C. W. Janssen;Eric Ronken

  • Differential role of the 5-HT1A receptor in aggressive and non-aggressive mice: an across-strain comparison

    Doretta Caramaschi;Sietse F. de Boer;Jaap M. Koolhaas

  • Long-lasting consequences of a social conflict in rats: Behavior during the interaction predicts subsequent changes in daily rhythms of heart rate, temperature, and activity

    P. Meerlo;A. Sgoifo;S.F. de Boer;J.M. Koolhaas

  • Hypothalamic, metabolic,and behavioral responses to pharmacological inhibition of CNS melanocortin signaling in rats.

    Tiziana Adage;Anton J. W. Scheurink;Sietse F. de Boer;Koert de Vries

  • Development of violence in mice through repeated victory along with changes in prefrontal cortex neurochemistry

    Doretta Caramaschi;Sietse F. de Boer;Han de Vries;Jaap M. Koolhaas

  • The acute glucocorticoid stress response does not differentiate between rewarding and aversive social stimuli in rats.

    Bauke Buwalda;Jan Scholte;Sietse F. de Boer;Caroline M. Coppens

  • Excessive aggression as model of violence: a critical evaluation of current preclinical methods

    Klaus A. Miczek;Sietse F. de Boer;Jozsef Haller

  • IndividualDifferencesin PlasmaCatecholamine andCorticosterone StressResponsesof Wild- Type Rats:Relationship WithAggression

    Andrea Sgoifo;Sietse F. De Boer;Jozsef Haller;Jaap M. Koolhaas

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaap M. Koolhaas
Jaap M. Koolhaas University of Groningen
Bauke Buwalda
Bauke Buwalda University of Groningen
Martien J H Kas
Martien J H Kas University of Groningen
Judith R. Homberg
Judith R. Homberg Radboud University
Peter Meerlo
Peter Meerlo University of Groningen
Wim E. Crusio
Wim E. Crusio University of Bordeaux
Han de Vries
Han de Vries Utrecht University
Klaus A. Miczek
Klaus A. Miczek Tufts University
Leonard C. Schalkwyk
Leonard C. Schalkwyk University of Essex
Edwin Cuppen
Edwin Cuppen Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens up a variety of career options, both online and on campus. Many students pursue a path to becoming a licensed therapist, which typically involves earning a master’s degree in counseling or psychology, followed by state licensure. While requirements vary by location, understanding the steps in different cities can help future professionals make informed decisions.

If you are interested in becoming a licensed therapist in Garland or want to explore licensed therapist requirements in Gilbert, you need to be aware of specific education, supervision, and exam requirements. Similarly, you can learn more about how to become a licensed therapist in Glendale or get details about becoming a licensed therapist in Greensboro.

As online degrees become more popular, many accredited programs offer flexible learning options that meet licensure requirements. Prospective therapists should carefully research both their educational path and state-specific licensing guidelines to ensure a smooth transition from student to professional.

Best Scientists Citing Sietse F. de Boer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles