World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
22575
World Ranking
18400
National Ranking
9181

John N. Fain publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Fain sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 275 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John N. Fain D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Fain sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John N. Fain is affiliated with the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in the United States. Their recent research contributions are published mainly in the journal Metabolism, with a focus that can be inferred from the selected editorial works.

Their recent papers include:

  • Editorial Board, 2021, Metabolism
  • Editorial Board, 2021, Metabolism

Frequent collaborators of John N. Fain have included the following researchers:

  • Christos S. Mantzoros
  • Luigi Gnudi
  • Per-Olof J. Hasselgren
  • Young-Bum Boston
  • Giuseppe Matarese

John N. Fain's work is consistently published in the venue Metabolism, indicating a specialization in metabolic research.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of the Release of Adipokines by Adipose Tissue, Adipose Tissue Matrix, and Adipocytes from Visceral and Subcutaneous Abdominal Adipose Tissues of Obese Humans

    John N. Fain;Atul K. Madan;M. Lloyd Hiler;Paramjeet Cheema

  • Human epicardial adipose tissue: A review

    Harold S. Sacks;John N. Fain

  • Release of interleukins and other inflammatory cytokines by human adipose tissue is enhanced in obesity and primarily due to the nonfat cells.

    John N Fain

  • 5-Hydroxytryptamine stimulates inositol phosphate production in a cell-free system from blowfly salivary glands. Evidence for a role of GTP in coupling receptor activation to phosphoinositide breakdown.

    I Litosch;C Wallis;J N Fain

  • Effects of Adenosine Nucleosides on Adenylate Cyclase, Phosphodiesterase, Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Accumulation, and Lipolysis in Fat Cells

    John N. Fain;Richard H. Pointer;Walter F. Ward

  • Role of phosphatidylinositol turnover in alpha1 and of adenylate cyclase inhibition in alpha2 effects of catecholamines

    John N. Fain;J.Adolfo García-Sáinz

  • Uncoupling Protein-1 and Related Messenger Ribonucleic Acids in Human Epicardial and Other Adipose Tissues: Epicardial Fat Functioning as Brown Fat

    Harold S. Sacks;John N. Fain;Ben Holman;Paramjeet Cheema

  • Adrenergic regulation of adipocyte metabolism.

    J N Fain;J A Garcĩa-Sáinz

  • Release of inflammatory mediators by human adipose tissue is enhanced in obesity and primarily by the nonfat cells: a review.

    John N. Fain

  • Resistin release by human adipose tissue explants in primary culture.

    John N Fain;Paramjeet S Cheema;Suleiman W Bahouth;M Lloyd Hiler

  • Higher production of IL-8 in visceral vs. subcutaneous adipose tissue. Implication of nonadipose cells in adipose tissue.

    Jens M. Bruun;Aina S. Lihn;Atul K. Madan;Steen B. Pedersen

  • TNFα release by the nonfat cells of human adipose tissue

    J. N. Fain;Suleiman Bahouth;A. K. Madan

  • Fat cell adenylate cyclase and beta-adrenergic receptors in altered thyroid states.

    C C Malbon;F J Moreno;R J Cabelli;J N Fain

  • Biochemical aspects of drug and hormone action on adipose tissue.

    John N. Fain

  • Regulation of adenylate cyclase by adenosine.

    John N. Fain;Craig C. Malbon

  • Effects of Glucocorticoids on Metabolism of Adipose Tissue in Vitro

    John N. Fain;Robert O. Scow;Sidney S. Chernick

  • Relationship between hormonal activation of phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis, fluid secretion and calcium flux in the blowfly salivary gland.

    J N Fain;M J Berridge

  • Stimulation by vasopressin and alpha-catecholamines of phosphatidylinositol formation in isolated rat liver parenchymal cells.

    M E Tolbert;A C White;K Aspry;J Cutts

  • The regulation of gluconeogenesis in isolated rat liver cells by glucagon, insulin, dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate, and fatty acids.

    Margaret E. Mayo Johnson;Naomi Mamota Das;Fred R. Butcher;John N. Fain

  • THE EFFECT OF ADRENERGIC BLOCKING AGENTS ON SOME METABOLIC ACTIONS OF CATECHOLAMINES

    Steven Mayer;Neil C. Moran;John Fain

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael P. Czech
Michael P. Czech University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Robert J. Lefkowitz
Robert J. Lefkowitz Duke University
Craig C. Malbon
Craig C. Malbon Stony Brook University
William Oh
William Oh Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Andrew H. Kang
Andrew H. Kang University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Christopher J. O'Donnell
Christopher J. O'Donnell Harvard Medical School
R. A. John Challiss
R. A. John Challiss University of Leicester
David L. Brautigan
David L. Brautigan University of Virginia
Martin Rodbell
Martin Rodbell National Institutes of Health
Dan Goldowitz
Dan Goldowitz University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring allied fields can expand your medical knowledge and open new doors in healthcare. For those interested in leadership or administration, consider earning a health care administration degree online. These programs are designed for flexibility and can prepare you for management roles within hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations.

Registered nurses seeking to advance their careers might explore an rn to np bridge program. These online bridge programs are ideal for RNs hoping to become nurse practitioners with greater autonomy and specialization.

If you have an interest in the science behind nutrition and food, an best online food science degree could be a great alternative or complement to medical studies. Graduates often work in health promotion, food safety, or dietary consulting, all of which are vital to preventive healthcare.

For those targeting higher-level administrative opportunities, explore the cahme accredited online mha programs list. CAHME accreditation ensures the quality and recognition of your degree in the evolving healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing John N. Fain

Recently Published Articles