World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
17823
World Ranking
18560
National Ranking
1680

John F. Smyth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Smyth sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 385 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John F. Smyth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Smyth sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

John F. Smyth is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their academic career includes recognition as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh since 1996.

Details on Smyth's areas of research, publications, co-authors, and frequent publication venues are not available. No recent papers, book publications, or specific fields and subfields of study have been documented.

Although information regarding their main topics of work or collaborative network is unavailable, their fellowship status indicates a level of engagement with the scholarly community at the University of Edinburgh and in broader academic circles.

The lack of detailed publication or field data limits a comprehensive overview of their specific research contributions or thematic focus within their discipline.

Best Publications

  • The tumor-promoting actions of TNF-α involve TNFR1 and IL-17 in ovarian cancer in mice and humans

    Kellie A. Charles;Hagen Kulbe;Robin Soper;Monica Escorcio-Correia

  • Docetaxel (Taxotere) in advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II clinical trial. EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group.

    A. Sulkes;J. Smyth;C. Sessa;L. Y. Dirix

  • Characterization and properties of nine human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell lines.

    Simon P. Langdon;Sandra S. Lawrie;Frances G. Hay;Mary M. Hawkes

  • WWOX: A candidate tumor suppressor gene involved in multiple tumor types

    A. J. W. Paige;K. J. Taylor;C. Taylor;S. G. Hillier

  • Intravesical Evans strain BCG therapy: quantitative immunohistochemical analysis of the immune response within the bladder wall.

    S. Prescott;K. James;T.B. Hargreave;G.D. Chisholm

  • Glutathione reduces the toxicity and improves quality of life of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer treated with cisplatin: Results of a double-blind, randomised trial

    J F Smyth;A Bowman;T Perren;Peter M Wilkinson

  • The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA expression in primary ovarian cancer.

    J. M. S. Bartlett;S. P. Langdon;B. J. B. Simpson;M. Stewart

  • Expression of the serine protease matriptase and its inhibitor HAI-1 in epithelial ovarian cancer: correlation with clinical outcome and tumor clinicopathological parameters.

    Michael D Oberst;Michael D Johnson;Robert B Dickson;Chen-Yong Lin

  • OPCML at 11q25 is epigenetically inactivated and has tumor-suppressor function in epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Grant C Sellar;Karen P Watt;Genevieve J Rabiasz;Euan A Stronach

  • Phase I study of etoposide with SDZ PSC 833 as a modulator of multidrug resistance in patients with cancer

    D J Boote;I F Dennis;P R Twentyman;R J Osborne

  • A prognostic model for ovarian cancer.

    T G Clark;M E Stewart;D G Altman;H Gabra

  • A Dynamic Inflammatory Cytokine Network in the Human Ovarian Cancer Microenvironment

    Hagen Kulbe;Probir Chakravarty;D. Andrew Leinster;Kellie A. Charles

  • Antiestrogen Therapy Is Active in Selected Ovarian Cancer Cases: The Use of Letrozole in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Patients

    John F. Smyth;Charlie Gourley;Graeme Walker;Melanie J. MacKean

  • Adjuvant interferon alpha 2b in high risk melanoma – the Scottish study

    D A Cameron;M C Cornbleet;R M Mackie;J A A Hunter

  • A clinical study assessing the tolerability and biological effects of infliximab, a TNF-α inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer

    E. R. Brown;K. A. Charles;S. A. Hoare;R. L. Rye

  • Enhanced DNA repair and resistance to cisplatin in human ovarian cancer

    Gi Ming Lai;Robert F. Ozols;John F. Smyth;Robert C. Young

  • Carcinosarcoma of the Ovary 19 Years of Prospective Data from a Single Center

    Ewan Brown;Moira Stewart;Tzyvia Rye;Awatif Al-Nafussi

  • Cutaneous malignant melanoma, Scotland, 1979-89

    R MacKie;T.C Aitchison;J.A.A Hunter;K Mclaren

  • Estrogen receptor-α mediates gene expression changes and growth response in ovarian cancer cells exposed to estrogen

    Amanda J M O’Donnell;Kenneth G Macleod;David J Burns;John F Smyth

  • Immunological Aspects of Cancer Chemotherapy

    Kenneth C. Calman;John F. Smyth;Martin H. N. Tattersall;Martin H. N. Tattersall

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon P. Langdon
Simon P. Langdon University of Edinburgh
Martin H.N. Tattersall
Martin H.N. Tattersall University of Sydney
William R. Miller
William R. Miller University of New Mexico
Kenneth G. MacLeod
Kenneth G. MacLeod University of Missouri
Frances R. Balkwill
Frances R. Balkwill Queen Mary University of London
Enrique Rozengurt
Enrique Rozengurt University of California, Los Angeles
David J. Porteous
David J. Porteous University of Edinburgh
Stan B. Kaye
Stan B. Kaye Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Robert E. Coleman
Robert E. Coleman University of Sheffield
Keith James
Keith James University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine in the USA doesn't always mean enrolling in traditional medical school. There are several related online degrees and career pathways that offer lucrative and rewarding options in healthcare.

For those with a non-nursing background interested in advanced nursing, direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online provide a fast-track to become a registered nurse and pursue graduate-level qualifications.

If you prefer to earn your nursing credential quickly, adn nursing programs offer a shorter time to licensure and can be more accessible than traditional BSN programs.

For those seeking less patient-focused roles, the growing field of health administration and insurance may appeal. Programs from accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid can launch a medical office career quickly and affordably.

Entry requirements also vary. Some do you have to take a teas test for lpn options do not require standardized admission exams, making the application process easier for many students.

Exploring these alternative pathways can open doors to healthcare careers beyond traditional medicine, providing flexibility and a range of opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing John F. Smyth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles