World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John F. B. Mitchell

John F. B. Mitchell

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
74
Citations
40577
World Ranking
1308
National Ranking
105

John F. B. Mitchell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. B. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 134 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John F. B. Mitchell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. B. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

John F. B. Mitchell is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions span multiple areas within Health Professions, with a particular focus on General Health Professions and Philosophy as subfields.

The scientist's recent publications include work on climate-related issues and environmental law. Notable papers include:

  • Climate Change 2023 Synthesis Report (2024), published in Climate Change and Law Collection
  • Detection and attribution of climate change (2021), published in Weather

John F. B. Mitchell has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Larisa Avens
  • Terry Henwood
  • Wayne Hoggard
  • J. Poffenberger
  • Chris Sasso

The main topics covered in their work address intersections of health, society, and identity. These include:

  • Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
  • Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health, Medicine and Society

Publications by John F. B. Mitchell are often found in specific venues related to meteorology and climate science, including Weather and Climate Change and Law Collection.

In addition to journal articles, John F. B. Mitchell has contributed to academic books. One such publication, released in 2021 by UNESCO, is titled Analysis of sea turtle bycatch in the commercial shrimp fisheries of Southeast U.S. waters and the Gulf of Mexico.

Best Publications

  • The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment

    Richard H. Moss;Jae A. Edmonds;Kathy A. Hibbard;Martin R. Manning

  • The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments

    C. Gordon;C. Cooper;C. A. Senior;H. Banks

  • THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research

    Gerald A. Meehl;Curt Covey;Thomas Delworth;Mojib Latif

  • Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report

    R. T. Watson;D. L. Albritton;T. Barker;I. A. Bashmakov

  • Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models

    R. D. Cess;G. L. Potter;J. P. Blanchet;G. J. Boer

  • Climate response to increasing levels of greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols

    J. F. B. Mitchell;T. C. Johns;Jonathan M. Gregory;S. F. B. Tett

  • The second Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: model description, spinup and validation

    Tim C. Johns;Ruth E. Carnell;Jenny F. Crossley;Jonathan M. Gregory

  • THE "GREENHOUSE" EFFECT AND CLIMATE CHANGE

    John F. B. Mitchell

  • External Control of 20th Century Temperature by Natural and Anthropogenic Forcings

    Peter A. Stott;S. F. B. Tett;G. S. Jones;M. R. Allen

  • Interpretation of Cloud-Climate Feedback as Produced by 14 Atmospheric General Circulation Models

    R. D. Cess;G. L. Potter;J. P. Blanchet;G. J. Boer

  • Equilibrium climate change - and its implications for the future

    J. F.B. Mitchell;Syukuro Manabe;V. Meleshko;T. Tokioka

  • A search for human influences on the thermal structure of the atmosphere

    B. D. Santer;K. E. Taylor;T. M. L. Wigley;T. C. Johns

  • Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with the HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios

    T.C. Johns;J.M. Gregory;W.J. Ingram;C.E. Johnson

  • Climate model simulations of the equilibrium climatic response to increased carbon dioxide

    Michael E. Schlesinger;John F. B. Mitchell

  • Causes of twentieth-century temperature change near the Earth's surface

    Simon F. B. Tett;Peter A. Stott;Myles R. Allen;William J. Ingram

  • Global Warming and Northern Hemisphere Sea Ice Extent

    Konstantin Y. Vinnikov;Alan Robock;Ronald J. Stouffer;John E. Walsh

  • Quantifying the uncertainty in forecasts of anthropogenic climate change

    Myles R. Allen;Peter A. Stott;John F. B. Mitchell;Reiner Schnur

  • Technical summary of working group 1.

    J. T. Houghton;D. L. Albritton;L. G. Meira Filho;U. Cubasch

  • C0 2 and climate: a missing feedback?

    J. F. B. Mitchell;C. A. Senior;W. J. Ingram

  • Carbon Dioxide and Climate. The Impact of Cloud Parameterization

    C. A. Senior;J. F. B. Mitchell

  • Thenextgenerationofscenariosforclimate change research and assessment

    RichardH . Moss;Timothy R. Carter;Seita Emori;Mikiko Kainuma

Frequent Co-Authors

Myles R. Allen
Myles R. Allen University of Oxford
Ronald J. Stouffer
Ronald J. Stouffer University of Arizona
Gerald A. Meehl
Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research
Peter A. Stott
Peter A. Stott Met Office
Karl E. Taylor
Karl E. Taylor Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
H. Le Treut
H. Le Treut Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Jacques Morcrette
Jean-Jacques Morcrette European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Erich Roeckner
Erich Roeckner Max Planck Society
Jonathan M. Gregory
Jonathan M. Gregory University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Many professionals complement their science background with administration and policy roles, making online MPA degrees a popular choice. These programs help develop leadership skills crucial for managing environmental projects at governmental and non-profit organizations.

For those interested in human and societal impacts on the environment, pursuing the best online bachelor degree in sociology can provide valuable insights into community behavior and environmental justice issues. This knowledge supports careers in environmental advocacy and education.

Academic advancement is also possible with flexible pathways such as doctoral programs online no dissertation. These programs allow professionals to gain advanced expertise without the traditional dissertation requirement, enabling faster career progression in research and leadership roles within environmental sectors.

Moreover, for educators focusing on environmental curriculum development or administration, exploring the best online EdS to EdD programs offers an efficient route to doctoral credentials. This education pathway supports roles that shape environmental education policy and practice.

Best Scientists Citing John F. B. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles