World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
39710
World Ranking
9949
National Ranking
5122

Robert Marcus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Marcus sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 314 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert Marcus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Marcus sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Marcus is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with specific focus on subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ecology, and Genetics.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Virus-based gene therapy research

Robert Marcus has contributed to scientific literature with publications concentrated in the venue known as "The biomedical & life sciences collection." All of their recent papers have appeared there.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Antibody genes and diversity, 2021, The biomedical & life sciences collection.
  • Antibody structure and function: antibody function, 2021, The biomedical & life sciences collection.
  • Antibody structure and function: antibody structure, 2021, The biomedical & life sciences collection.

These three papers were authored by Mike Clark and have not yet accumulated citations. The research topics of these papers align with Robert Marcus's focus on monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies.

There are no records of frequent co-authors or book publications linked to Robert Marcus. The research centers significantly on immunology-related studies, as shown by multiple contributions related to antibody genes, structure, and function.

Best Publications

  • Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures

    Dennis M Black;Steven R Cummings;David B Karpf;Jane A Cauley

  • Effects of Estrogen or Estrogen/ Progestin Regimens on Heart Disease Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women: The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial

    Valery T. Miller;John LaRosa;Vanessa Barnabei;Craig Kessler

  • Peak bone mass

    R. P. Heaney;Steven Abrams;B. Dawson-Hughes;A. Looker

  • New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data

    Dennis R. Carter;Mary L. Bouxsein;Robert Marcus

  • Teriparatide or Alendronate in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis

    Kenneth G. Saag;Elizabeth Shane;Steven Boonen;Fernando Marin

  • Clinical and anthropometric correlates of bone mineral acquisition in healthy adolescent girls.

    Debra K. Katzman;Laura K. Bachrach;Dennis R. Carter;Robert Marcus

  • Muscle hypertrophy response to resistance training in older women

    S. L. Charette;L. McEvoy;G. Pyka;C. Snow-Harter

  • Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study — A large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men

    Eric Orwoll;Janet Babich Blank;Elizabeth Barrett-Connor;Jane Cauley

  • Menstrual Function and Bone Mass in Elite Women Distance Runners: Endocrine and Metabolic Features

    Robert Marcus;Christopher Cann;Philip Madvig;Jerome Minkoff

  • Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal study.

    Laura K. Bachrach;Trevor Hastie;May-Choo Wang;Balasubramanian Narasimhan

  • Effects of resistance and endurance exercise on bone mineral status of young women: A randomized exercise intervention trial

    Christine Snow-Harter;Mary L. Bouxsein;Barbara T. Lewis;Dennis R. Carter

  • Decreased bone density in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa

    Laura K. Bachrach;David Guido;Debra Katzman;Iris F. Litt

  • Once-weekly resistance exercise improves muscle strength and neuromuscular performance in older adults.

    Dennis R. Taaffe;Camille Duret;Steve Wheeler;Robert Marcus;Robert Marcus

  • Effects of short term administration of recombinant human growth hormone to elderly people.

    Robert Marcus;Gail Butterfield;Leah Holloway;Linda Gilliland

  • The presence of a polymorphism at the translation initiation site of the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with low bone mineral density in postmenopausal mexican‐American women

    Coleman Gross;T. Ross Eccleshall;Peter J. Malloy;Marie Luz Villa;Marie Luz Villa

  • Ketoconazole blocks adrenal steroidogenesis by inhibiting cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes.

    David S. Loose;Patricia B. Kan;Margaret A. Hirst;Robert A. Marcus

  • Gymnasts exhibit higher bone mass than runners despite similar prevalence of amenorrhea and oligomenorrhea.

    T.L. Robinson;Christine Snow-Harter;D.R. Taaffe;D. Gillis

  • High‐Impact Exercise Promotes Bone Gain in Well‐Trained Female Athletes

    Dennis R. Taaffe;Dennis R. Taaffe;Tracey L. Robinson;Christine M. Snow;Robert Marcus;Robert Marcus

  • Differential effects of swimming versus weight-bearing activity on bone mineral status of eumenorrheic athletes.

    Dennis R. Taaffe;Christine Snow-Harter;Declan A. Connolly;Tracey L. Robinson

  • Disordered eating, menstrual irregularity, and bone mineral density in female runners.

    Kristin L. Cobb;Laura K. Bachrach;Gail Greendale;Robert Marcus

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis R. Taaffe
Dennis R. Taaffe Edith Cowan University
Andrew R. Hoffman
Andrew R. Hoffman Stanford University
Dennis R. Carter
Dennis R. Carter Stanford University
Gerald D. Aurbach
Gerald D. Aurbach National Institutes of Health
Wolfgang Hiddemann
Wolfgang Hiddemann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jennifer L. Kelsey
Jennifer L. Kelsey Stanford University
Elizabeth Shane
Elizabeth Shane Columbia University
Gail A. Greendale
Gail A. Greendale University of California, Los Angeles
Harry K. Genant
Harry K. Genant University of California, San Francisco
Mary L. Bouxsein
Mary L. Bouxsein Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring a future in medicine but want to consider alternative or related pathways, there are a range of online degrees and career options worth exploring. These programs offer flexibility, allowing you to advance your healthcare career while balancing other commitments.

For those interested in nursing, some schools now offer options such as a nursing school that does not require teas test. This can streamline the admissions process and open the door for more applicants. Professionals who want to move into healthcare management might consider a best online healthcare administration degree, which prepares you for leadership roles in hospitals and clinics.

Registered nurses holding an associate’s degree can pursue advanced practice roles efficiently through asn to np programs, which bridge the gap to nurse practitioner qualifications. If your interests lie in preventative health and wellness, a bachelor's in nutrition online can provide a strong foundation in nutritional science and open doors to a fast-growing job market.

Each of these online options offers flexibility, career growth, and a chance to make a difference in healthcare settings beyond traditional medical school pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Marcus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles