World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andreas Güntner

Andreas Güntner

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
56
Citations
8696
World Ranking
2488
National Ranking
159

Andreas Güntner publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Güntner sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 277 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Andreas Güntner D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Güntner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andreas Güntner is affiliated with the University of Potsdam in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work encompasses a range of subfields including Oceanography, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, and Atmospheric Science.

Their research topics focus considerably on geophysical and hydrological phenomena. Key topics include:

  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Climate Variability and Models
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis

Among recent publications, the following papers stand out:

  • "Quantifying the Central European Droughts in 2018 and 2019 With GRACE Follow-On", 2020, published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • "COSMOS-Europe: a European network of cosmic-ray neutron soil moisture sensors", 2022, published in Earth system science data
  • "A dense network of cosmic-ray neutron sensors for soil moisture observation in a highly instrumented pre-Alpine headwater catchment in Germany", 2020, published in Earth system science data
  • "Closing the Water Cycle from Observations across Scales: Where Do We Stand?", 2021, published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Projected Changes in Compound Flood Hazard From Riverine and Coastal Floods in Northwestern Europe", 2020, published in Earth's Future

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Marvin Reich
  • Martin Schrön
  • Daniel Rasche
  • Theresa Blume
  • Eva Boergens

Andreas Güntner's work appears regularly in specialized publication venues with multiple contributions to journals such as:

  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Earth System Science Data
  • Geophysical Journal International
  • Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Hydrological Processes

Best Publications

  • Substantial glacier mass loss in the Tien Shan over the past 50 years

    Daniel Farinotti;Laurent Longuevergne;Geir Moholdt;Doris Duethmann

  • GRACE observations of changes in continental water storage

    Roland Schmidt;Peter Schwintzer;Frank Flechtner;Christoph Reigber

  • Time variations of land water storage from an inversion of 2 years of GRACE geoids

    Guillaume Ramillien;Frédéric Frappart;Anny Cazenave;Andreas Güntner

  • A global analysis of temporal and spatial variations in continental water storage

    Andreas Güntner;Jochen Stuck;Susanna Werth;Petra Döll

  • What Can be Expected from the GRACE-FO Laser Ranging Interferometer for Earth Science Applications?

    Frank Flechtner;Karl-Hans Neumayer;Christoph Dahle;Henryk Dobslaw

  • Improvement of Global Hydrological Models Using GRACE Data

    Andreas Güntner

  • Time variations of the regional evapotranspiration rate from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite gravimetry

    Guillaume Ramillien;Frédéric Frappart;Andreas Güntner;Thanh Ngo-Duc

  • Attribution of streamflow trends in snow and glacier melt-dominated catchments of the Tarim River, Central Asia

    Doris Duethmann;Tobias Bolch;Daniel Farinotti;David Kriegel

  • Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: An evaluation of different terrain indices.

    Andreas Güntner;Jan Seibert;Stefan Uhlenbrook

  • Loss of reservoir volume by sediment deposition and its impact on water availability in semiarid Brazil

    José Carlos De Araújo;Andreas Güntner;Axel Bronstert

  • Quantifying the Central European Droughts in 2018 and 2019 With GRACE Follow-On

    Eva Boergens;Andreas Güntner;Henryk Dobslaw;Christoph Dahle

  • Modelling Freshwater Resources at the Global Scale: Challenges and Prospects

    Petra Doll;Herve Douville;Andreas Guntner;Hannes Muller Schmied

  • Cascade-based disaggregation of continuous rainfall time series : the influence of climate

    Andreas Güntner;Jonas Olsson;Ann Calver;Beate Gannon

  • Representation of landscape variability and lateral redistribution processes for large-scale hydrological modelling in semi-arid areas

    Andreas Güntner;Axel Bronstert;Axel Bronstert

  • Multi‐criterial validation of TOPMODEL in a mountainous catchment

    A. Güntner;S. Uhlenbrook;J. Seibert;Ch. Leibundgut

  • Emerging methods for noninvasive sensing of soil moisture dynamics from field to catchment scale: a review

    Heye R. Bogena;Johan A. Huisman;Andreas Güntner;Christof Hübner

  • Recent hydrological behavior of the East African great lakes region inferred from GRACE, satellite altimetry and rainfall observations

    Mélanie Becker;William LLovel;Anny Cazenave;Andreas Güntner

  • Integration of GRACE mass variations into a global hydrological model

    Susanna Werth;Andreas Güntner;Svetozar Petrović;Roland Schmidt

  • The value of satellite-derived snow cover images for calibrating a hydrological model in snow-dominated catchments in Central Asia

    Doris Duethmann;Juliane Peters;Theresa Blume;Sergiy Vorogushyn

  • Long-term groundwater storage change in Victoria, Australia from satellite gravity and in situ observations

    J.L. Chen;C.R. Wilson;B.D. Tapley;Bridget Scanlon

  • Evaluation of GRACE filter tools from a hydrological perspective

    S. Werth;A. Güntner;R. Schmidt;J. Kusche

Frequent Co-Authors

Theresa Blume
Theresa Blume Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
Axel Bronstert
Axel Bronstert University of Potsdam
Bruno Merz
Bruno Merz University of Potsdam
Sergiy Vorogushyn
Sergiy Vorogushyn Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
Adrian Jäggi
Adrian Jäggi University of Bern
Fabrice Papa
Fabrice Papa Laboratoire d’Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales
Petra Döll
Petra Döll Goethe University Frankfurt
Frédéric Frappart
Frédéric Frappart Bordeaux Sciences Agro
Guillaume Ramillien
Guillaume Ramillien Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Sean Bruinsma
Sean Bruinsma Centre National D'Etudes Spatiales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways. For adult learners and seniors seeking flexible, convenient learning options, exploring online degrees for seniors can offer tailored programs that fit diverse schedules and learning paces.

Additionally, interdisciplinary careers often benefit from specialized skills, such as those developed through an ala mlis programs. These programs prepare students for roles in information management, which is valuable when handling vast datasets in Earth Science research and environmental policy.

For individuals considering broader educational investments, understanding if a degree is right for their career goals is crucial. Resources like is a library science degree worth it help weigh the benefits and challenges of pursuing related degrees that can complement scientific expertise.

Creative career paths can also intersect with Earth Science, where skills in visual documentation are essential. Programs highlighted under photography degrees online provide opportunities to learn digital photography, which is valuable for environmental monitoring, research publications, and public outreach.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Güntner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles