World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
35507
World Ranking
11636
National Ranking
5968

John E. Connett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Connett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 311 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John E. Connett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Connett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. Connett is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and focuses on medical research with a particular emphasis on pulmonary and respiratory medicine as well as cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including general health professions, epidemiology, and surgery.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of clinical and translational areas involving chronic conditions and treatments. Major topics include:

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their research contributions. These include:

  • Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, 2020, published in The Lancet
  • Effect of Inhaled Cannabis for Pain in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease, 2020, published in JAMA Network Open
  • Development of Conceptual Models to Guide Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy: Synthesizing Traditional and Contemporary Paradigms, 2020, published in Health Promotion Practice
  • Serum IgG Levels and Risk of COPD Hospitalization, 2020, published in CHEST Journal
  • Rationale and methods of the Advanced R2Eperfusion STrategies for Refractory Cardiac Arrest (ARREST) trial, 2020, published in American Heart Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with John E. Connett include:

  • Erika S. Helgeson
  • Thomas A. Murray
  • Elizabeth R. Mueller
  • D. Yvette LaCoursiere
  • Jean F. Wyman

Publications are often featured in well-known journals and venues such as:

  • JAMA Network Open
  • CHEST Journal
  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society
  • Research Square (Research Square)

John E. Connett's body of work is situated within the broader field of medicine, comprising approximately 90 publications, with significant contributions to pulmonary and respiratory medicine and cardiology. This research addresses both clinical outcomes and methodological innovations in public health and treatment strategies related to chronic and acute medical conditions.

Best Publications

  • Effects of Smoking Intervention and the Use of an Inhaled Anticholinergic Bronchodilator on the Rate of Decline of FEV1: The Lung Health Study

    Nicholas R. Anthonisen;John E. Connett;James P. Kiley;Murray D Altose

  • The effects of a smoking cessation intervention on 14.5-year mortality: a randomized clinical trial.

    Nicholas R. Anthonisen;Melissa A. Skeans;Robert A. Wise;Jure Manfreda

  • Azithromycin for Prevention of Exacerbations of COPD

    Richard K. Albert;Richard K. Albert;John Connett;William C. Bailey;Richard Casaburi

  • Leisure-time physical activity levels and risk of coronary heart disease and death. The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.

    Arthur S Leon;John E Connett;David R Jacobs;Rainer Rauramaa;Rainer Rauramaa

  • Effect of inhaled triamcinolone on the decline in pulmonary function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    R. Wise;John E Connett;G. Weinmann;P. Scanlon

  • Smoking cessation and lung function in mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Lung Health Study.

    Paul D. Scanlon;John E. Connett;Lance A. Waller;Murray D. Altose

  • Smoking and Lung Function of Lung Health Study Participants after 11 Years

    Nicholas R. Anthonisen;John E. Connett;Robert P. Murray;Robert P. Murray

  • Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs intensive medical management for the control of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia: The diabetes surgery study randomized clinical trial

    Sayeed Ikramuddin;Judith Korner;Wei Jei Lee;John E. Connett

  • Lower respiratory illnesses promote FEV(1) decline in current smokers but not ex-smokers with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the lung health study.

    Richard E. Kanner;Nicholas R. Anthonisen;John E. Connett

  • The Lung Health Study. Baseline characteristics of randomized participants.

    A. S. Buist;J. E. Connett

  • Hospitalizations and mortality in the Lung Health Study.

    Nicholas R. Anthonisen;Nicholas R. Anthonisen;John E. Connett;Paul L. Enright;Paul L. Enright;Jure Manfreda;Jure Manfreda

  • Fibrotic extracellular matrix activates a profibrotic positive feedback loop

    Matthew W. Parker;Matthew W. Parker;Daniel Rossi;Mark Peterson;Karen Smith

  • C‐reactive protein and mortality in mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    S. F P Man;John E Connett;N. R. Anthonisen;R. A. Wise

  • Methacholine reactivity predicts changes in lung function over time in smokers with early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Donald P. Tashkin;Murray D. Altose;John E. Connett;Richard E. Kanner

  • Spirometry in the Lung Health Study. 1. Methods and quality control.

    P. L. Enright;L. R. Johnson;J. E. Connett;H. Voelker

  • Simvastatin for the Prevention of Exacerbations in Moderate-to-Severe COPD

    G. J. Criner;John E Connett;S. D. Aaron;R. K. Albert

  • The role of matrix metalloproteinase polymorphisms in the rate of decline in lung function

    Ladina Joos;Jian Qing He;Megan B. Shepherdson;John E. Connett

  • The Lung Health Study: Airway Responsiveness to Inhaled Methacholine in Smokers with Mild to Moderate Airflow Limitation

    Donald P. Tashkin;Murray D. Altose;Eugene R. Bleecker;John E. Connett

  • Gender differences in smoking cessation after 3 years in the Lung Health Study.

    W. Bjornson;C. Rand;J. E. Connett;P. Lindgren

  • Effects of Smoking Intervention and the Use of an Inhaled Anticholinergic Bronchodilator on the Rate of Decline of FEV1. The Lung Health Study

    N. R. Anthoisen;J. E. Connett;J. P. Kiley;M. D. Altose

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Wise
Robert A. Wise Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Donald P. Tashkin
Donald P. Tashkin University of California, Los Angeles
Andrew J. Sandford
Andrew J. Sandford University of British Columbia
Peter D. Paré
Peter D. Paré University of British Columbia
Gerard J. Criner
Gerard J. Criner Temple University
Prescott G. Woodruff
Prescott G. Woodruff University of California, San Francisco
MeiLan K. Han
MeiLan K. Han University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark T. Dransfield
Mark T. Dransfield University of Alabama at Birmingham
Fernando J. Martinez
Fernando J. Martinez University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Jeffrey L. Curtis
Jeffrey L. Curtis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying medicine or expanding your career in healthcare, many flexible online degree options are available. For those with a non-nursing background, online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors can be a direct route into advanced nursing roles without prior nursing experience.

Additionally, registered nurses wanting to advance their qualifications may consider the cheapest rn to bsn programs. These online pathways help working nurses earn a bachelor's degree affordably and efficiently.

For those pursuing advanced research or academic careers, an online phd nursing program provides the highest level of clinical and leadership training. This can open doors to roles in teaching, research, and health policy.

Those seeking quick entry into the nursing profession may also explore cheapest online accelerated bsn programs designed for individuals with a bachelor’s degree in another field.

Exploring these related online degree pathways helps aspiring and current healthcare professionals find the right fit for their educational and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing John E. Connett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles