World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
80046
World Ranking
9053
National Ranking
4669

Paul L. Enright publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Enright sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 303 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul L. Enright D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Enright sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul L. Enright is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant emphasis on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Additional subfields include Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Physiology, Neurology, and Geriatrics and Gerontology.

The scientist's work has concentrated on topics such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research, Respiratory Support and Mechanisms, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Asthma and Respiratory Diseases, Respiratory and Cough-Related Research, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and Frailty in Older Adults.

Recent publications include the following papers:

  • Prevalence and Population-Attributable Risk for Chronic Airflow Obstruction in a Large Multinational Study, 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Association of Nonobstructive Chronic Bronchitis With Respiratory Health Outcomes in Adults, 2020, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Gas Exchange Impairment During COVID-19 Recovery, 2021, Respiratory Care
  • GPs should not try to detect mild COPD, 2020, npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
  • Meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies identify multiple novel loci associated with pulmonary function, 2020, UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors working with Paul L. Enright include:

  • Laura R. Loehr
  • Ravi Kalhan
  • Stephanie J. London
  • George O'connor
  • Lewis J. Smith

Key venues for their publications encompass:

  • UNC Libraries
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Respiratory Care
  • npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine

Best Publications

  • Standardisation of spirometry

    M. R. Miller;J. Hankinson;V. Brusasco;F. Burgos

  • Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations

    Philip H. Quanjer;Sanja Stanojevic;Tim J. Cole;Xaver Baur

  • The cardiovascular health study: Design and rationale

    Linda P. Fried;Nemat O. Borhani;Paul Enright;Curt D. Furberg

  • Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes

    Wanger J;Clausen Jl;Coates A;Pedersen Of

  • Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults

    Paul L. Enright;Duane L. Sherrill

  • Effects of Smoking Intervention and the Use of an Inhaled Anticholinergic Bronchodilator on the Rate of Decline of FEV1: The Lung Health Study

    Nicholas R. Anthonisen;John E. Connett;James P. Kiley;Murray D Altose

  • Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung

    N Macintyre;R O Crapo;G Viegi;D C Johnson

  • General considerations for lung function testing.

    M. R. Miller;R. Crapo;J. Hankinson;V. Brusasco

  • Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999.

    Crapo Ro;Casaburi R;Coates Al;Enright Pl

  • Clinical Correlates of White Matter Findings on Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging of 3301 Elderly People: The Cardiovascular Health Study

    W.T. Longstreth;Teri A. Manolio;Alice Arnold;Gregory L. Burke

  • An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: asthma control and exacerbations: standardizing endpoints for clinical asthma trials and clinical practice.

    Helen K. Reddel;D. Robin Taylor;Eric D. Bateman;Louis-Philippe Boulet

  • Predictors of sleep-disordered breathing in community-dwelling adults: the Sleep Heart Health Study.

    Terry Young;Eyal Shahar;F. Javier Nieto;Susan Redline

  • The Six-Minute Walk Test

    Paul L Enright

  • Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in two cohorts: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology.

    Mary Cushman;Albert W Tsai;Richard H White;Susan R Heckbert

  • The 6-min Walk Test: A Quick Measure of Functional Status in Elderly Adults

    Paul L. Enright;Mary Ann McBurnie;Vera Bittner;Russell P. Tracy

  • Importance of heart failure with preserved systolic function in patients ≥65 years of age

    Dalane W Kitzman;Julius M Gardin;John S Gottdiener;Alice Arnold

  • SERIES ''ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING'' Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 2 in this Series Standardisation of spirometry

    J. Hankinson;V. Brusasco;F. Burgos;R. Casaburi

  • SERIES ''ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING'' Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 1 in this Series General considerations for lung function testing

    R. Crapo;J. Hankinson;V. Brusasco;F. Burgos

  • SERIES ''ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING'' Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 4 in this Series Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung

    N. MacIntyre;G. Viegi;V. Brusasco;F. Burgos

  • Effects of Smoking Intervention and the Use of an Inhaled Anticholinergic Bronchodilator on the Rate of Decline of FEV1. The Lung Health Study

    N. R. Anthoisen;J. E. Connett;J. P. Kiley;M. D. Altose

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne B. Newman
Anne B. Newman University of Pittsburgh
R. Graham Barr
R. Graham Barr Columbia University
Richard A. Kronmal
Richard A. Kronmal University of Washington
Teri A. Manolio
Teri A. Manolio National Institutes of Health
Eric A. Hoffman
Eric A. Hoffman University of Iowa
Michael D. Lebowitz
Michael D. Lebowitz University of Arizona
Steven M. Kawut
Steven M. Kawut University of Pennsylvania
Susan R. Heckbert
Susan R. Heckbert University of Washington
Janet Stocks
Janet Stocks University College London
Gregory L. Burke
Gregory L. Burke Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related fields, especially within nursing and healthcare leadership. Many students and working professionals are now exploring nursing school online for greater flexibility and affordability, allowing them to start or advance their healthcare careers while balancing other commitments.

If you are looking for advanced practice roles, consider the cheapest online dnp programs, which prepare nurses for leadership in clinical practice and academia. For registered nurses ready to take the next step, the cheapest online bsn programs offer a cost-effective path to earning a bachelor's degree, a requirement for many specialty and supervisory roles.

Non-nurses seeking to enter the field can benefit from online msn programs for non nurses, which provide a streamlined route to advanced nursing positions, even without previous experience. Exploring these online degree options can help you find the best academic and professional pathway—whether you are starting your journey or seeking to advance within the ever-evolving healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Paul L. Enright

Trending Scientists