What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Disease
- Diabetes mellitus
Paul L. Enright spends much of his time researching Physical therapy, Internal medicine, Spirometry, FEV1/FVC ratio and Cohort study.
His Physical therapy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both COPD, Medical prescription, Confidence interval and Reference values.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Airway obstruction, Family medicine and Cardiology in addition to Internal medicine.
His Spirometry study improves the overall literature in Asthma.
His Vital capacity study, which is part of a larger body of work in FEV1/FVC ratio, is frequently linked to Technician, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Cohort study study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Hazard ratio, Body mass index and Risk factor.
His most cited work include:
- Standardisation of spirometry (10089 citations)
- The cardiovascular health study: Design and rationale (3187 citations)
- Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations (2363 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Paul L. Enright mainly focuses on Spirometry, Physical therapy, Internal medicine, FEV1/FVC ratio and COPD.
His study focuses on the intersection of Spirometry and fields such as Pulmonary function testing with connections in the field of Lung volumes and Diffusing capacity.
His Physical therapy study also includes fields such as
- Cohort study which intersects with area such as Gerontology,
- Epidemiology most often made with reference to Pediatrics.
As a member of one scientific family, Paul L. Enright mostly works in the field of Internal medicine, focusing on Surgery and, on occasion, Stroke.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Pulmonary disease, Smoking cessation, Emergency medicine and Referral.
His work in the fields of Lung, such as Lung function, intersects with other areas such as Mesa.
He most often published in these fields:
- Spirometry (47.99%)
- Physical therapy (40.66%)
- Internal medicine (34.80%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?
- Spirometry (47.99%)
- Internal medicine (34.80%)
- COPD (22.34%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Spirometry, Internal medicine, COPD, Physical therapy and Cardiology.
Spirometry is a primary field of his research addressed under Asthma.
His Internal medicine study frequently involves adjacent topics like Surgery.
His COPD research incorporates elements of Respimat, Epidemiology, Cause of death, Intensive care medicine and Cohort.
His Physical therapy research includes themes of Odds ratio, Young adult, Cross-sectional study, Obstructive lung disease and Disease.
His FEV1/FVC ratio study is concerned with Lung function in general.
Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations (2363 citations)
- Frailty and Respiratory Impairment in Older Persons (97 citations)
- The Strong Heart Study (78 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Disease
- Diabetes mellitus
Spirometry, Internal medicine, Physical therapy, COPD and Lung are his primary areas of study.
His Spirometry research is classified as research in Asthma.
His Internal medicine study incorporates themes from Psychological intervention and Cardiology.
His Physical therapy study combines topics in areas such as Odds ratio, Pulmonary disease, Obstructive lung disease, Cross-sectional study and Disease.
His COPD research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Wheeze, Spirometer, Epidemiology, Pathology and Cholesterol.
His Vital capacity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Gerontology, Coefficient of variation, Standard score, Range and Skewness.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
