World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
116
Citations
84413
World Ranking
4255
National Ranking
2328

John S. Gottdiener publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Gottdiener sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 427 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John S. Gottdiener D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Gottdiener sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John S. Gottdiener is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Additional subfields include radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, genetics, surgery, and epidemiology.

The scientist's work spans multiple topics within cardiovascular health, including:

  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

Notable recent publications include:

  • Genome-wide association and Mendelian randomisation analysis provide insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Sex-Specific Associations of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Biomarkers With Incident Heart Failure, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Characterization of cardiac mechanics and incident atrial fibrillation in participants of the Cardiovascular Health Study, 2020, JCI Insight
  • Lifestyle habits associated with cardiac conduction disease, 2023, European Heart Journal
  • Cumulative burden of clinically significant aortic stenosis in community-dwelling older adults, 2021, Heart

Frequent co-authors who collaborate with John S. Gottdiener include:

  • Jorge R. Kizer
  • Bruce M. Psaty
  • Sanjiv J. Shah
  • Traci M. Bartz
  • Kenneth J. Mukamal

The scientist often publishes in a range of cardiovascular-focused journals. Some of the most frequent publication venues are:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Heart
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Frailty in Older Adults Evidence for a Phenotype

    Linda P. Fried;Catherine M. Tangen;Jeremy Walston;Anne B. Newman

  • Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study.

    Vuyisile T Nkomo;Julius M Gardin;Thomas N Skelton;John S Gottdiener

  • Clinical Factors Associated With Calcific Aortic Valve Disease

    B.Fendley Stewart;David Siscovick;Bonnie K. Lind;Julius M. Gardin

  • Single-Drug Therapy for Hypertension in Men -- A Comparison of Six Antihypertensive Agents with Placebo

    Barry J. Materson;Barry J. Materson;Domenic J. Reda;William C. Cushman;Barry M. Massie

  • HIV Infection and the Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Matthew S. Freiberg;Chung Chou H Chang;Lewis H. Kuller;Melissa Skanderson

  • Recommendations for Evaluation of Prosthetic Valves With Echocardiography and Doppler Ultrasound. A Report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, Developed in Conjunction With the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association

    William A. Zoghbi;John B. Chambers;Jean G. Dumesnil;Elyse Foster

  • American Society of Echocardiography Recommendations for Use of Echocardiography in Clinical Trials A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and The Task Force on Echocardiography in Clinical Trials

    John S. Gottdiener;James Bednarz;Richard Devereux;Julius Gardin

  • Predictors of congestive heart failure in the elderly: the cardiovascular health study

    John S Gottdiener;Alice M Arnold;Gerard P Aurigemma;Joseph F Polak

  • Frailty and Activation of the Inflammation and Coagulation Systems With and Without Clinical Comorbidities Results From the Cardiovascular Health Study

    Jeremy Walston;Mary Ann McBurnie;Anne Newman;Russell P. Tracy

  • Associations of Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease With Frailty

    Anne B. Newman;John S. Gottdiener;Mary Ann McBurnie;Calvin H. Hirsch

  • Genome-wide association and Mendelian randomisation analysis provide insights into the pathogenesis of heart failure.

    S Shah;A Henry;C Roselli;H Lin

  • Patterns and significance of distribution of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A wide angle, two dimensional echocardiographic study of 125 patients.

    Barry J. Maron;John S. Gottdiener;Stephen E. Epstein

  • Importance of heart failure with preserved systolic function in patients ≥65 years of age

    Dalane W Kitzman;Julius M Gardin;John S Gottdiener;Alice Arnold

  • Association of serial measures of cardiac troponin T using a sensitive assay with incident heart failure and cardiovascular mortality in older adults

    Christopher R. deFilippi;James A. de Lemos;Robert H. Christenson;John S. Gottdiener

  • Simple risk model predicts incidence of atrial fibrillation in a racially and geographically diverse population: the CHARGE-AF consortium

    Alvaro Alonso;Bouwe P. Krijthe;Thor Aspelund;Katherine A. Stepas

  • Recommendations on the use of echocardiography in adult hypertension: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)

    Thomas H. Marwick;Thierry C. Gillebert;Gerard Aurigemma;Julio Chirinos

  • Predictive value of systolic and diastolic function for incident congestive heart failure in the elderly: the cardiovascular health study.

    Gerard P Aurigemma;John S Gottdiener;Lynn Shemanski;Julius Gardin

  • Renal insufficiency as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in elderly individuals.

    Linda F. Fried;Michael G. Shlipak;Michael G. Shlipak;Casey Crump;Richard A. Kronmal

  • Outcome of congestive heart failure in elderly persons: influence of left ventricular systolic function. The Cardiovascular Health Study.

    John S Gottdiener;Robyn L McClelland;Robert Marshall;Lynn Shemanski

  • Burden of valvular heart diseases : a population-based study. Commentary

    Bernard Iung;Alec Vahanian;Vuyisile T. Nkomo;Julius M. Gardin

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce M. Psaty
Bruce M. Psaty University of Washington
David S. Siscovick
David S. Siscovick University of Washington
Julius M. Gardin
Julius M. Gardin Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
David S. Krantz
David S. Krantz Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Russell P. Tracy
Russell P. Tracy University of Vermont
Kenneth J. Mukamal
Kenneth J. Mukamal Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Susan R. Heckbert
Susan R. Heckbert University of Washington
Robert H. Christenson
Robert H. Christenson University of Maryland, Baltimore
Joachim H. Ix
Joachim H. Ix University of California, San Diego
Dalane W. Kitzman
Dalane W. Kitzman Wake Forest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up a range of related degrees and online pathways that support diverse interests and job opportunities in healthcare. For those passionate about preventive health and wellness, nutrition degrees online provide flexible learning options and the skills needed for roles in dietetics, public health, and clinical nutrition.

If you’re interested in the management side of healthcare, consider enrolling in top online mha programs that are cahme accredited to gain expertise in healthcare administration. These programs can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals and health systems.

Nurses looking to advance their education may benefit from online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, which offer greater flexibility for working professionals. For those seeking the highest level of clinical nursing practice, accelerated msn to dnp programs provide a fast track to leadership and advanced practice positions.

Each of these accredited pathways can complement or enhance a career in medicine or healthcare, allowing for specialization and professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing John S. Gottdiener

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles