World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
30628
World Ranking
15940
National Ranking
1463

Janet Stocks publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Stocks sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 365 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Janet Stocks D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Stocks sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janet Stocks is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom and primarily focuses on research in the field of Medicine. Their work is especially concentrated within the subfields of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, and Epidemiology.

The scientific contributions of Janet Stocks cover a range of topics in respiratory health, notably in:

  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • Tracheal and airway disorders

Several recent papers document their research output, including:

  • "An observational study of the lung clearance index throughout childhood in cystic fibrosis: early years matter," 2020, European Respiratory Journal
  • "Minimal change in structural, functional and inflammatory markers of lung disease in newborn screened infants with cystic fibrosis at one year," 2020, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • "Early Pseudomonas aeruginosa predicts poorer pulmonary function in preschool children with cystic fibrosis," 2022, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • "SA6 Humanistic and Economic Burden of Recurrence in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Systematic Literature Review," 2024, Value in Health

The frequent publication venues where Janet Stocks's work appears include:

  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • European Respiratory Journal
  • Value in Health

Their frequent coauthors reflect ongoing collaborations in the respiratory field and include:

  • Gwyneth Davies
  • Andrew Bush
  • Angie Wade
  • C. Pao
  • Emma Raywood

Best Publications

  • Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations

    Philip H. Quanjer;Sanja Stanojevic;Tim J. Cole;Xaver Baur

  • An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: pulmonary function testing in preschool children.

    Nicole Beydon;Stephanie D. Davis;Enrico Lombardi;Julian L. Allen

  • Reference values for residual volume, functional residual capacity and total lung capacity. ATS Workshop on Lung Volume Measurements. Official Statement of The European Respiratory Society.

    J. Stocks;Ph.H. Quanjer

  • Reference Ranges for Spirometry Across All Ages: A New Approach

    Sanja Stanojevic;Angie Wade;Janet Stocks;John Hankinson

  • Consensus statement for inert gas washout measurement using multiple- and single- breath tests

    Paul D. Robinson;Philipp Latzin;Sylvia Verbanck;Graham L. Hall

  • GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images.

    Andy Adler;John H Arnold;Richard Bayford;Andrea Borsic

  • Lung function and respiratory symptoms at 11 years in children born extremely preterm: the EPICure study

    Joseph Fawke;Sooky Lum;Jane Kirkby;Enid Hennessy

  • Using the lower limit of normal for the FEV1/FVC ratio reduces the misclassification of airway obstruction

    Maureen P Swanney;Gregg Ruppel;Paul L Enright;Ole F Pedersen

  • Multiple-Breath Washout as a Marker of Lung Disease in Preschool Children with Cystic Fibrosis

    Paul Aurora;Andrew Bush;Per Gustafsson;Cara Oliver

  • Early lung development: lifelong effect on respiratory health and disease

    Janet Stocks;Alison Hislop;Samatha Sonnappa

  • Long-term impact of neonatal intensive care and surgery on somatosensory perception in children born extremely preterm

    Suellen M. Walker;Linda S. Franck;Maria Fitzgerald;Jonathan Myles

  • Multiple breath inert gas washout as a measure of ventilation distribution in children with cystic fibrosis.

    P Aurora;P Gustafsson;A Bush;A Lindblad

  • Quality control for spirometry in preschool children with and without lung disease.

    Paul Aurora;Janet Stocks;Cara Oliver;Clare Saunders

  • Respiratory Function Among Preterm Infants Whose Mothers Smoked During Pregnancy

    Ah-Fong Hoo;Matthias Henschen;Carol Dezateux;Kate Costeloe

  • Specifications for equipment used for infant pulmonary function testing

    U Frey;J Stocks;A Coates;P Sly

  • Reference values for lung function: past, present and future

    S Stanojevic;A Wade;J Stocks

  • Tidal breath analysis for infant pulmonary function testing

    J. H. T. Bates;G. Schmalisch;D. Filbrun;J. Stocks

  • Early detection of cystic fibrosis lung disease: multiple-breath washout versus raised volume tests

    Sooky Lum;Per Gustafsson;Henrik Ljungberg;Georg Hulskamp

  • Spirometry Centile Charts for Young Caucasian Children The Asthma UK Collaborative Initiative

    Sanja Stanojevic;Angie Wade;Tim J. Cole;Sooky Lum

  • The effect of parental smoking on lung function and development during infancy

    Janet Stocks;Carol Dezateux

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Bush
Andrew Bush Imperial College London
Tim J. Cole
Tim J. Cole University College London
Neil Marlow
Neil Marlow University College London
Fenella J. Kirkham
Fenella J. Kirkham University College London
Peter D. Sly
Peter D. Sly University of Queensland
Jonathan C. K. Wells
Jonathan C. K. Wells University College London
Paul L. Enright
Paul L. Enright University of Arizona
Robert C. Strunk
Robert C. Strunk Washington University in St. Louis
John O. Warner
John O. Warner Imperial College London
Seeromanie Harding
Seeromanie Harding King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine in the USA opens doors to many diverse paths beyond traditional medical school. For those interested in healthcare management, earning a degree in healthcare administration online can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and other health organizations.

If you prefer a clinical track, consider online nursing programs that suit your needs. Many students ask, do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school? You'll find schools that offer flexible admissions without requiring TEAS or HESI exams.

There are also in-demand non-clinical options, such as attending medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid to launch a career in medical information management. For current registered nurses looking to advance, programs like asn to fnp bridges allow you to progress from an associate degree in nursing to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner.

These online options create flexible, affordable, and accessible pathways to rewarding roles in the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Janet Stocks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles