World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 3970 3660 423 402 219 17497

Bonnie Auyeung publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bonnie Auyeung between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bonnie Auyeung published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 137 publications in 2013. 22 of the 360 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 137. Peak 137 publications in 2013. 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 137 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 13 publications
2006 2025

360 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bonnie Auyeung: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 6
2010 3
2011 2
2012 16
2013 137
2014 12
2015 13
2016 10
2017 7
2018 7
2019 11
2020 20
2021 38
2022 26
2023 19
2024 9
2025 13
Total 360
Download as CSV

Bonnie Auyeung publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonnie Auyeung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 219 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 219
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bonnie Auyeung D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bonnie Auyeung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bonnie Auyeung is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom and has a research focus spanning medicine and psychology, with a significant emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and clinical psychology. Their work covers various subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, obstetrics and gynecology, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their research topics include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, autism spectrum disorder research, the impact of COVID-19 on reproduction, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, functional brain connectivity studies, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, and early childhood education and development.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Bonnie Auyeung include:

  • "Brain charts for the human lifespan" (2022) published in Nature
  • "SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination rates in pregnant women in Scotland" (2022) published in Nature Medicine
  • "Atypical Brain Asymmetry in Autism-A Candidate for Clinically Meaningful Stratification" (2020) published in Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • "Prenatal exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and associations with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in children" (2021) published in Environmental Research
  • "Pregnancy outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in periods dominated by delta and omicron variants in Scotland: a population-based cohort study" (2022) published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bonnie Auyeung include:

  • Aja Louise Murray
  • Simon Baron-Cohen
  • Michael Lombardo
  • Eva Loth
  • Declan Murphy

The most frequent publication venues for Bonnie Auyeung's work are:

  • Molecular Autism
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Best Publications

  • Sex/Gender Differences and Autism: Setting the Scene for Future Research

    Meng-Chuan Lai;Michael V. Lombardo;Bonnie Auyeung;Bhismadev Chakrabarti

  • Toward brief "red flags" for autism screening: The short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 cases and 3,000 controls.

    Carrie Allison;Bonnie Auyeung;Simon Baron-Cohen

  • Why Are Autism Spectrum Conditions More Prevalent in Males

    Simon Baron-Cohen;Michael Lombardo;Bonnie Auyeung;Emma Ashwin

  • Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants

    Stuart J Ritchie;Simon R Cox;Xueyi Shen;Michael V Lombardo;Michael V Lombardo

  • Quantifying and exploring camouflaging in men and women with autism

    Meng-Chuan Lai;Michael V Lombardo;Amber Nv Ruigrok;Bhismadev Chakrabarti;Bhismadev Chakrabarti

  • The Autism Spectrum Quotient: Children’s Version (AQ-Child)

    Bonnie Auyeung;Simon Baron-Cohen;Sally Wheelwright;Carrie Allison

  • Measuring autistic traits in the general population: a systematic review of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a nonclinical population sample of 6,900 typical adult males and females

    Emily Ruzich;Carrie Allison;Paula Smith;Peter Watson

  • Fetal testosterone and autistic traits

    Bonnie Auyeung;Simon Baron-Cohen;Emma Ashwin;Rebecca Knickmeyer;Rebecca Knickmeyer

  • Elevated fetal steroidogenic activity in autism

    Simon Baron-Cohen;Bonnie Auyeung;Bent Nørgaard-Pedersen;David M. Hougaard

  • Fetal testosterone and empathy: Evidence from the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test

    Emma Chapman;Simon Baron-Cohen;Bonnie Auyeung;Rebecca Knickmeyer

  • Fetal Testosterone Predicts Sexually Differentiated Childhood Behavior in Girls and in Boys

    Bonnie Auyeung;Simon Baron-Cohen;Emma Ashwin;Rebecca Knickmeyer;Rebecca Knickmeyer

  • The Children's Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient: Sex Differences in Typical Development and in Autism Spectrum Conditions

    Bonnie Auyeung;Sally Wheelwright;Carrie Allison;Matthew Atkinson

  • Defining the broader, medium and narrow autism phenotype among parents using the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)

    Sally Wheelwright;Bonnie Auyeung;Carrie Allison;Simon Baron-Cohen

  • Fetal Testosterone Influences Sexually Dimorphic Gray Matter in the Human Brain

    Michael V. Lombardo;Emma Ashwin;Emma Ashwin;Bonnie Auyeung;Bhismadev Chakrabarti;Bhismadev Chakrabarti

  • Oxytocin, brain physiology, and functional connectivity: a review of intranasal oxytocin fMRI studies.

    Richard A.I. Bethlehem;Richard A.I. Bethlehem;Jack van Honk;Jack van Honk;Bonnie Auyeung;Simon Baron-Cohen

  • The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism

    Simon Baron-Cohen;Daniel C. Bowen;Rosemary J. Holt;Carrie Allison

  • The EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project (LEAP): design and methodologies to identify and validate stratification biomarkers for autism spectrum disorders

    Eva Loth;Tony Charman;Luke Mason;Julian Tillmann

  • Oxytocin increases eye contact during a real-time, naturalistic social interaction in males with and without autism

    B Auyeung;MV Lombardo;M Heinrichs;B Chakrabarti

  • Prenatal and postnatal hormone effects on the human brain and cognition

    Bonnie Auyeung;Michael V. Lombardo;Simon Baron-Cohen

  • Coping with stress across the lifespan: Absolute vs. relative changes in strategy

    James Amirkhan;Bonnie Auyeung

  • Foetal testosterone and autistic traits in 18 to 24-month-old children

    Bonnie Auyeung;Kevin Taylor;Gerald Hackett;Simon Baron-Cohen

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Baron-Cohen
Simon Baron-Cohen University of Cambridge
Michael V. Lombardo
Michael V. Lombardo Italian Institute of Technology
Meng-Chuan Lai
Meng-Chuan Lai Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Carrie Allison
Carrie Allison University of Cambridge
Bhismadev Chakrabarti
Bhismadev Chakrabarti University of Reading
Aja Louise Murray
Aja Louise Murray University of Edinburgh
Rebecca C. Knickmeyer
Rebecca C. Knickmeyer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Prantik Kundu
Prantik Kundu Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Carol Brayne
Carol Brayne University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Psychology in the USA, you may also want to consider closely related fields such as Social Work. Both Psychology and Social Work share a focus on understanding human behavior, providing support, and improving people's quality of life. With the rise of flexible learning, pursuing an online degree is increasingly popular and accessible.

Many universities offer reputable online Social Work programs tailored to various locations. For example, you can explore the most valuable online social work programs in Maryland if you are interested in opportunities on the East Coast. If the Midwest appeals to you, consider the most valuable online social work degrees in the Midwest.

For those located in the West, there are excellent most valuable online social work degree programs in Nevada. And if Ohio is your state of interest, review the most valuable online social work programs in Ohio. Each of these online pathways can lead to fulfilling careers in counseling, advocacy, case management, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Bonnie Auyeung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles