World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
31843
World Ranking
18268
National Ranking
9113

Jennifer Daley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer Daley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 148 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jennifer Daley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer Daley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jennifer Daley is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and focuses their research within the broad domain of Arts and Humanities. Their academic work prominently engages with subfields such as Museology and History, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to cultural and historical studies.

The primary topics covered in Jennifer Daley's research include Fashion and Cultural Textiles as well as French Historical and Cultural Studies. These areas indicate a specialized interest in how fashion intersects with societal narratives, particularly within a historical French context.

Their academic collaborations include frequent co-authorship with several scholars, reflecting a network of interdisciplinary engagement. Notable frequent coauthors are Onore Testa, Christian Delage, Christian Ingrao, Henry Rousso, and Nuria Aragon.

Jennifer Daley has contributed to published literature beyond journal articles, including a book titled Fashion, Society, and the First World War, published by Bloomsbury Publishing plc in 2021. This work has attracted some citations, representing their contribution to the field of historical fashion studies.

  • Onore Testa
  • Christian Delage
  • Christian Ingrao
  • Henry Rousso
  • Nuria Aragon

  • Fashion and Cultural Textiles
  • French Historical and Cultural Studies

  • Museology
  • History

Best Publications

  • The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

    S F Khuri;J Daley;W Henderson;K Hur

  • Independent Association between Acute Renal Failure and Mortality following Cardiac Surgery

    Glenn M Chertow;Elliott M Levy;Karl E Hammermeister;Frederick Grover

  • Preoperative Serum Albumin Level as a Predictor of Operative Mortality and Morbidity: Results From the National VA Surgical Risk Study

    James Gibbs;William Cull;William Henderson;Jennifer Daley

  • Preoperative Renal Risk Stratification

    G M Chertow;J M Lazarus;C L Christiansen;E F Cook

  • ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina).

    Raymond J. Gibbons;Kanu Chatterjee;Jennifer Daley;John S. Douglas

  • Multifactorial Risk Index for Predicting Postoperative Respiratory Failure in Men After Major Noncardiac Surgery

    Ahsan M. Arozullah;Jennifer Daley;William G. Henderson;Shukri F. Khuri

  • Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care : Results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study

    Daley J;Khuri Sf;Henderson W;Hur K

  • Development and validation of a multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative pneumonia after major noncardiac surgery

    Ahsan M. Arozullah;Shukri F. Khuri;William G. Henderson;Jennifer Daley

  • The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility.

    Aaron S. Fink;Darrell A. Campbell;Robert M. Mentzer;Robert M. Mentzer;Robert M. Mentzer;William G. Henderson;William G. Henderson;William G. Henderson

  • Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery.

    Tracie C. Collins;Jennifer Daley;William H. Henderson;Shukri F. Khuri

  • Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?

    L I Iezzoni;S M Foley;J Daley;J Hughes

  • Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort

    Stephen H Bailey;David A Bull;David H Harpole;Jeffrey J Rentz

  • Successful Implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the Private Sector: The Patient Safety in Surgery Study

    Shukri F. Khuri;William G. Henderson;Jennifer Daley;Olga Jonasson

  • Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer

    Walter E. Longo;Katherine S. Virgo;Frank E. Johnson;Charles A. Oprian

  • The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Shukri F. Khuri;Jennifer Daley;William G. Henderson

  • Racial variation in cardiac procedure use and survival following acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Eric D. Peterson;Steven M. Wright;Jennifer Daley;George E. Thibault

  • Identifying complications of care using administrative data.

    Lisa I. Iezzoni;Jennifer Daley;Timothy Heeren;Susan M. Foley

  • ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: Executive summary and recommendations: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina)

    R. J. Gibbons;K. Chatterjee;J. Daley;J. S. Douglas

  • Relation of Surgical Volume to Outcome in Eight Common Operations: Results From the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

    Shukri F. Khuri;Shukri F. Khuri;Jennifer Daley;Jennifer Daley;William Henderson;Kwan Hur

  • Generation of monoclonal antibodies to a human natural killer clone. Characterization of two natural killer-associated antigens, NKH1A and NKH2, expressed on subsets of large granular lymphocytes.

    T Hercend;J D Griffin;A Bensussan;R E Schmidt

Frequent Co-Authors

Shukri F. Khuri
Shukri F. Khuri Harvard University
William G. Henderson
William G. Henderson University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Stuart F. Schlossman
Stuart F. Schlossman Harvard University
Lisa I. Iezzoni
Lisa I. Iezzoni Harvard University
Jerome Ritz
Jerome Ritz Harvard University
Kirsten L. Johansen
Kirsten L. Johansen University of Minnesota
Timothy Heeren
Timothy Heeren Boston University
Frederick L. Grover
Frederick L. Grover University of Colorado Denver
Ellis L. Reinherz
Ellis L. Reinherz Harvard University
Elliott S. Fisher
Elliott S. Fisher Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but aren’t set on a traditional MD route, there are many online options that can boost your career while providing flexibility. For those drawn to food and wellness, an online dietitian degree can open doors to nutrition consulting or clinical dietetics.

If leadership and healthcare management appeal to you, consider online mha programs. These graduate qualifications prepare you for hospital administration and healthcare policy roles, often with the flexibility of remote study.

For registered nurses looking to advance their education quickly, several online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements provide an efficient path to earning your bachelor’s. This can help you move into leadership or specialized nursing roles.

Advanced practice nurses may be interested in the shortest dnp program online, allowing for a streamlined path to top clinical and leadership positions.

These alternate pathways offer targeted education for a variety of healthcare careers, with the convenience of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer Daley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles