World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14481 13636 7324 6778 282 30963

Janet B. McGill publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet B. McGill between 1983 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet B. McGill published across 44 years, from 1983 to 2026, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2023. 26 of the 328 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2023. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 2 publications
1983 2026

328 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet B. McGill: publications per year, 1983 to 2026
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 3
1991 5
1992 5
1993 1
1994 5
1995 5
1996 3
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 3
2002 4
2003 11
2004 6
2005 13
2006 12
2007 22
2008 8
2009 14
2010 3
2011 5
2012 9
2013 11
2014 11
2015 17
2016 7
2017 9
2018 7
2019 21
2020 15
2021 10
2022 14
2023 27
2024 10
2025 24
2026 2
Total 328
Download as CSV

Janet B. McGill publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet B. McGill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 282 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 282
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet B. McGill D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet B. McGill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Janet B. McGill is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant concentration in Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism. Their work spans multiple subfields including Surgery, Genetics, Physiology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics of their research include diabetes treatment and management, diabetes management and research, pancreatic function and diabetes, diabetes and associated disorders, hormonal regulation and hypertension, diet and metabolism studies, and hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients.

Janet B. McGill has published extensively, with their frequent publication venues including:

  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
  • Diabetes Care
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Consensus Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm - 2020 Executive Summary (2020, Endocrine Practice)
  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin (2021, JAMA)
  • American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update (2022, Endocrine Practice)
  • Serum Urate Lowering with Allopurinol and Kidney Function in Type 1 Diabetes (2020, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes (2020, JAMA)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Peter Rossing
  • Irl B. Hirsch
  • Guillermo E. Umpierrez
  • Grazia Aleppo
  • Davida F. Kruger

Best Publications

  • A Trial of Darbepoetin Alfa in Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease

    Marc A Pfeffer;Emmanuel A. Burdmann;Chao Yin Chen;Mark E. Cooper

  • Metabolic effects of carvedilol vs metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.

    George L. Bakris;George L. Bakris;George L. Bakris;Vivian Fonseca;Vivian Fonseca;Richard E. Katholi;Richard E. Katholi;Janet B. McGill

  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Roy W Beck;Tonya Riddlesworth;Katrina Ruedy;Andrew Ahmann

  • AACE comprehensive diabetes management algorithm 2013.

    Alan J. Garber;Martin J. Abrahamson;Joshua I. Barzilay;Lawrence Blonde

  • Role of Orlistat in the Treatment of Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A 1-year randomized double-blind study

    Priscilla A Hollander;Steven C Elbein;Irl B Hirsch;David Kelley

  • American association of clinical endocrinologists and american college of endocrinology - clinical practice guidelines for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan - 2015.

    Yehuda Handelsman;Zachary T. Bloomgarden;George Grunberger;Guillermo Umpierrez

  • The risk of developing end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy: the RENAAL study.

    William F. Keane;Barry M. Brenner;Dick de Zeeuw;Jean-Pierre Grunfeld

  • Effects of nortriptyline on depression and glycemic control in diabetes: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Patrick J. Lustman;Linda S. Griffith;Ray E. Clouse;Kenneth E. Freedland

  • Evidence of a Strong Association Between Frequency of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c Levels in T1D Exchange Clinic Registry Participants

    Kellee M. Miller;Roy W. Beck;Richard M. Bergenstal;Robin S. Goland

  • Anxiety and poor glycemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature.

    Ryan J. Anderson;Allison B. Grigsby;Kenneth E. Freedland;Mary De Groot

  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: A Randomized Trial

    Roy W Beck;Tonya D Riddlesworth;Katrina Ruedy;Andrew Ahmann

  • Factors Responsible for Impaired Fibrinolysis in Obese Subjects and NIDDM Patients

    Janet B McGill;David J Schneider;Cynthia L Arfken;Charles L Lucore

  • American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists' Comprehensive Diabetes Management Algorithm 2013 Consensus Statement - Executive Summary

    Alan J. Garber;Martin J. Abrahamson;Joshua I. Barzilay;Lawrence Blonde

  • Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection therapy are equally effective in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, parallel-group, 24-week study.

    Philip Raskin;Bruce W. Bode;Jennifer B. Marks;Irl B. Hirsch

  • The beneficial effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with captopril on diabetic nephropathy in normotensive IDDM patients with microalbuminuria ☆

    Lori M.B. Laffel;Janet B. McGill;Daniel J. Gans

  • The effect of ruboxistaurin on nephropathy in type 2 diabetes

    Katherine R. Tuttle;George L. Bakris;Robert D. Toto;Janet B. McGill

  • Consensus Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm – 2019 Executive Summary

    Alan J. Garber;Martin J. Abrahamson;Joshua I. Barzilay;Lawrence Blonde

  • Gastrointestinal absorption and plasma kinetics of soy Δ5-phytosterols and phytostanols in humans

    Richard E. Ostlund;Janet B. McGill;Chun-Min Zeng;Douglas F. Covey

  • Independent components of chronic kidney disease as a cardiovascular risk state: results from the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP).

    Peter A. McCullough;Claudine T. Jurkovitz;Pablo E. Pergola;Janet B. McGill

Frequent Co-Authors

George L. Bakris
George L. Bakris University of Chicago
Irl B. Hirsch
Irl B. Hirsch University of Washington
Philip Raskin
Philip Raskin The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Guillermo E. Umpierrez
Guillermo E. Umpierrez Emory University
Vivian Fonseca
Vivian Fonseca Tulane University
Mark E. Cooper
Mark E. Cooper Monash University
John J.V. McMurray
John J.V. McMurray University of Glasgow
Marc A. Pfeffer
Marc A. Pfeffer Harvard Medical School
Scott D. Solomon
Scott D. Solomon Brigham and Women's Hospital
Rodica Pop-Busui
Rodica Pop-Busui University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways and advanced credentials is becoming more accessible for those interested in health care careers. Many professionals are considering options such as rn to bsn programs no clinicals, which allow registered nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing without the need for in-person clinical hours. These programs are ideal for working nurses seeking to advance their qualifications with more flexibility.

For those focused on leadership or specialized roles, there are several dnp programs online designed to expedite earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice. Some of the dnp programs online are considered more manageable in terms of course load and duration, making them attractive for busy professionals.

Meanwhile, entry into nursing can be accelerated through fastest lpn program pathways. These programs enable students to quickly qualify as Licensed Practical Nurses and gain hands-on experience in the field.

Whether you are just starting your medical journey or seeking advancement, online options provide diverse routes tailored to meet different career goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Janet B. McGill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles