World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 16966 15954 8509 7868 395 28817

Rodica Pop-Busui publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rodica Pop-Busui between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rodica Pop-Busui published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 17.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2025. 107 of the 465 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2025. 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 39 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 51 publications 2023: 48 publications 2024: 51 publications 2025: 56 publications
2000 2025

465 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rodica Pop-Busui: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 3
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 11
2010 12
2011 15
2012 10
2013 12
2014 16
2015 7
2016 17
2017 13
2018 31
2019 17
2020 39
2021 42
2022 51
2023 48
2024 51
2025 56
Total 465
Download as CSV

Rodica Pop-Busui publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodica Pop-Busui sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 395 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 395
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rodica Pop-Busui D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rodica Pop-Busui sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rodica Pop-Busui is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio primarily focused on medicine, with a significant emphasis on endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

Their research spans several subfields of study, including:

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Physiology
  • Genetics

Major topics covered in their work include:

  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Rodica Pop-Busui has contributed to research published in a variety of frequent venues, which are:

  • Diabetes
  • Diabetes Care
  • Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
  • UNC Libraries

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Lynn Ang
  • Kara Mizokami-Stout
  • Salim S. Hayek
  • Caroline R. Richardson
  • John B. Buse

Some of the recent papers by Rodica Pop-Busui and their colleagues include:

  • Heart Failure: An Underappreciated Complication of Diabetes. A Consensus Report of the American Diabetes Association, 2022, Diabetes Care
  • American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update, 2022, Endocrine Practice
  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin, 2021, JAMA
  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes, 2020, JAMA
  • Serum Urate Lowering with Allopurinol and Kidney Function in Type 1 Diabetes, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine

Best Publications

  • Diabetic Neuropathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association

    Rodica Pop-Busui;Andrew J.M. Boulton;Eva L. Feldman;Vera Bril

  • Effect of intensive treatment of hyperglycaemia on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an analysis of the ACCORD randomised trial

    Faramarz Ismail-Beigi;Timothy Craven;Mary Ann Banerji;Jan Basile

  • Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in diabetes: clinical impact, assessment, diagnosis, and management

    Vincenza Spallone;Dan Ziegler;Roy Freeman;Luciano Bernardi

  • Effects of Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction on Mortality Risk in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Trial

    Rodica Pop-Busui;Gregory W. Evans;Hertzel C. Gerstein;Vivian Fonseca

  • Association of Type 1 Diabetes vs Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosed During Childhood and Adolescence With Complications During Teenage Years and Young Adulthood.

    Dana Dabelea;Jeanette M. Stafford;Elizabeth J. Mayer-Davis;Ralph D’Agostino

  • Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes: a clinical perspective.

    Rodica Pop-Busui

  • Neuropathy and Related Findings in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study

    Catherine L. Martin;James W. Albers;Rodica Pop-Busui

  • Use of the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument as a measure of distal symmetrical peripheral neuropathy in Type 1 diabetes: results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications.

    W. H. Herman;R. Pop-Busui;B. H. Braffett;C. L. Martin

  • Effect of prior intensive insulin treatment during the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes during the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study

    James W. Albers;William H. Herman;Rodica Pop-Busui;Eva L. Feldman

  • Elevated triglycerides correlate with progression of diabetic neuropathy

    Timothy D. Wiggin;Kelli A. Sullivan;Rodica Pop-Busui;Antonino Amato

  • Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: 10 years after the diabetes control and complications trial

    Neil H. White;Wanjie Sun;Patricia A. Cleary;Ronald P. Danis

  • Diabetic neuropathy and oxidative stress

    Rodica Pop-Busui;Anders A. F. Sima;Martin Stevens;Martin Stevens

  • Diabetic neuropathy: mechanisms, emerging treatments, and subtypes.

    James W. Albers;Rodica Pop-Busui

  • Effects of Prior Intensive Insulin Therapy on Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System Function in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study (DCCT/EDIC)

    Rodica Pop-Busui;Phillip A. Low;Barbara H. Waberski;Catherine L. Martin

  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Richard E Pratley;Lauren G Kanapka;Michael R Rickels;Andrew Ahmann

  • Glucose Control and Diabetic Neuropathy: Lessons from Recent Large Clinical Trials

    Lynn Ang;Mamta Jaiswal;Catherine Martin;Rodica Pop-Busui

  • REPLACE-BG: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes

    Grazia Aleppo;Katrina J Ruedy;Tonya D Riddlesworth;Davida F Kruger

  • Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Youth With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.

    Mamta Jaiswal;Jasmin Divers;Dana Dabelea;Scott Isom

  • Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Thomas Martens;Roy W Beck;Ryan Bailey;Katrina J Ruedy

  • Serum Urate Lowering with Allopurinol and Kidney Function in Type 1 Diabetes

    A. Doria;A. T. Galecki;C. Spino;R. Pop-Busui

Frequent Co-Authors

Eva L. Feldman
Eva L. Feldman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William H. Herman
William H. Herman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John M. Lachin
John M. Lachin George Washington University
Trevor J. Orchard
Trevor J. Orchard University of Pittsburgh
Neil H. White
Neil H. White Washington University in St. Louis
Mark E. Molitch
Mark E. Molitch Northwestern University
Janet B. McGill
Janet B. McGill Washington University in St. Louis
Elsayed Z. Soliman
Elsayed Z. Soliman Wake Forest University
Andrew J.M. Boulton
Andrew J.M. Boulton University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA opens up numerous online learning opportunities. Fast-track programs now make it possible for students to accelerate their journey into healthcare careers. For those eager to advance in nursing, the shortest dnp program online can help you achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in less time than traditional pathways.

Choosing among different dnp programs is crucial—look for accredited options that fit both your schedule and your career goals. Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) seeking a swift entry into the workforce might consider the fastest lpn program, offering high flexibility and rapid graduation.

Mental health nursing is another promising path. With a fast track mental health nursing program, you can specialize quickly and begin making a positive impact. These online options are ideal for students who value speed, flexibility, and quality in their medical or nursing education.

Best Scientists Citing Rodica Pop-Busui

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles