World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 128 2652 2473 131 127 958 82887

Michael Roden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Roden between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Roden published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 33.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 100 publications in 2024. 101 of the 1,299 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 100. Peak 100 publications in 2024. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 37 publications 2012: 45 publications 2013: 53 publications 2014: 56 publications 2015: 69 publications 2016: 47 publications 2017: 74 publications 2018: 80 publications 2019: 85 publications 2020: 54 publications 2021: 83 publications 2022: 79 publications 2023: 99 publications 2024: 100 publications 2025: 100 publications 2026: 1 publication
1988 2026

1,299 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Roden: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 5
1992 5
1993 7
1994 5
1995 2
1996 3
1997 5
1998 2
1999 9
2000 16
2001 19
2002 15
2003 12
2004 24
2005 13
2006 13
2007 26
2008 13
2009 18
2010 24
2011 37
2012 45
2013 53
2014 56
2015 69
2016 47
2017 74
2018 80
2019 85
2020 54
2021 83
2022 79
2023 99
2024 100
2025 100
2026 1
Total 1,299
Download as CSV

Michael Roden publications per year - data summary

  • Michael Roden, a Medicine scholar from Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, has 1,299 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive years are 2024 and 2025, with 100 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1988 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 39 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989 and 1990).
  • The rate of publication averages 33.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 35.1 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 379 publications, 29% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 60 publications (4.6 per year); 2001-2013: 312 publications (24.0 per year); 2014-2026: 927 publications (71.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Michael Roden publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Roden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 941–960 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 958 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133 958
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Roden publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Michael Roden, a Medicine scholar from Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, records 958 publications - the 93rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 93% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Michael Roden, and about 7% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Michael Roden ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Michael Roden D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Roden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 128–129 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230 128
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Michael Roden D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Michael Roden, a Medicine scholar from Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, records 128 D-Index - the 87th percentile of the discipline.
  • 87% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Michael Roden, and about 13% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Michael Roden ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Michael Roden is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research spans multiple domains within medicine and biomedicine, with a particular emphasis on metabolic diseases and their underlying mechanisms. Roden's scientific contributions encompass a substantial number of publications, reflecting a sustained research output in their fields of interest.

The main fields of study for Roden include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these broader domains, their work intersects with key subfields such as Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Physiology, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, and Genetics.

Roden's research topics focus extensively on the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases, as well as metabolism-related studies. Some of the prominent thematic areas covered in their work are:

  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Diabetes Management and Research

Throughout their career, Roden has collaborated frequently with several other researchers, notably including:

  • Christian Herder
  • Róbert Wágner
  • Oana-Patricia Zaharia
  • Klaus Straßburger
  • Volker Burkart

Their work has been published across various scientific venues, with repeated contributions to journals such as:

  • Diabetes
  • Diabetologie und Stoffwechsel
  • Journal of Hepatology
  • Diabetologia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among Michael Roden's recent papers are the following notable publications:

  • "A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature," published in 2023 in Hepatology
  • "A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature," published in 2023 in the Journal of Hepatology
  • "EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)," published in 2024 in the Journal of Hepatology
  • "The complex link between NAFLD and type 2 diabetes mellitus - mechanisms and treatments," published in 2021 in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • "A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature," published in 2023 in Annals of Hepatology

Best Publications

  • EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

    Giulio Marchesini;Christopher P. Day;Jean Francois Dufour;Ali Canbay

  • New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk

    Josée Dupuis;Josée Dupuis;Claudia Langenberg;Inga Prokopenko;Richa Saxena;Richa Saxena

  • New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (vol 42, pg 105, 2010)

    J Dupuis;C Langenberg;I Prokopenko;R Saxena

  • Twelve type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci identified through large-scale association analysis

    Benjamin F. Voight;Benjamin F. Voight;Laura J. Scott;Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir;Andrew P. Morris

  • Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes

    Andrew P Morris;Benjamin F Voight;Benjamin F Voight;Tanya M Teslovich;Teresa Ferreira

  • Mechanism of free fatty acid-induced insulin resistance in humans.

    Michael Roden;Thomas B. Price;Gianluca Perseghin;Kitt Falk Petersen

  • Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations

    Harm-Jan Westra;Marjolein J Peters;Tõnu Esko;Hanieh Yaghootkar

  • A genome-wide association search for type 2 diabetes genes in African Americans.

    N D Palmer;C W McDonough;P J Hicks;B H Roh

  • Intramyocellular lipid concentrations are correlated with insulin sensitivity in humans: a 1H NMR spectroscopy study.

    Krssak M;Falk Petersen K;Dresner A;DiPietro L

  • Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy—European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel Statement on Assessment, Aetiology and Management

    Erik S. Stroes;Paul D. Thompson;Alberto Corsini;Georgirene D. Vladutiu

  • Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions

    Colin J Greaves;Kate E Sheppard;Charles Abraham;Wendy Hardeman

  • The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes

    Christian Fuchsberger;Christian Fuchsberger;Jason A. Flannick;Jason A. Flannick;Tanya M. Teslovich;Anubha Mahajan

  • Identification of Serum Metabolites Associated With Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Using a Targeted Metabolomic Approach

    Anna Floegel;Norbert Stefan;Zhonghao Yu;Kristin Mühlenbruch

  • Genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analysis provides insight into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes susceptibility.

    Anubha Mahajan;Min Jin Go;Weihua Zhang;Jennifer E. Below

  • Increased Glucose Transport–Phosphorylation and Muscle Glycogen Synthesis after Exercise Training in Insulin-Resistant Subjects

    Gianluca Perseghin;Thomas B. Price;Kitt Falk Petersen;Michael Roden

  • The integrative biology of type 2 diabetes.

    Michael Roden;Gerald I. Shulman

  • Adaptation of Hepatic Mitochondrial Function in Humans with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Is Lost in Steatohepatitis

    Chrysi Koliaki;Julia Szendroedi;Kirti Kaul;Tomas Jelenik

  • Erratum: New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (Nature Genetics (2010) 42 (105-116))

    Josée Dupuis;Claudia Langenberg;Inga Prokopenko;Richa Saxena

  • The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes

    Christian Fuchsberger;Jason Flannick;Tanya M. Teslovich;Anubha Mahajan

  • Genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analysis provides insight into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes susceptibility

    Anubha Mahajan;Min Jin Go;Weihua Zhang;Jennifer E. Below

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Herder
Christian Herder Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Wolfgang Rathmann
Wolfgang Rathmann Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Annette Peters
Annette Peters Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Werner Waldhäusl
Werner Waldhäusl Medical University of Vienna
Christa Meisinger
Christa Meisinger University of Augsburg
Barbara Thorand
Barbara Thorand Helmholtz Zentrum München
Wolfgang Koenig
Wolfgang Koenig German Heart Centre
Christian Gieger
Christian Gieger Helmholtz Zentrum München
Giovanni Pacini
Giovanni Pacini National Research Council (CNR)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring pathways beyond traditional medical school is a smart way to advance a career in healthcare. For those considering high-level nursing roles, earning a doctorate can be more accessible than ever. Explore the cheapest phd nursing programs available online for a flexible and budget-friendly route to leadership or research positions.

If you're already an RN, moving up the career ladder is simplified with the cheap rn to bsn programs offered online. These degrees help nurses boost their qualifications, often at a lower cost and in less time than traditional options.

For non-nurses interested in rapidly entering advanced practice, consider online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses. These programs allow individuals with a bachelor’s degree in another field to swiftly transition into nursing at the master’s level.

Admission competitiveness can be a concern. If you're searching for less competitive options, check out the easy nursing schools to get into. These schools provide valuable entry points into nursing, making healthcare careers more accessible for a wider range of students.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Roden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles