World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Political Science
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 47 1162 1082 177 156 125 9349
Political Science 47 303 269 45 42 126 9381

Jane Broadbent publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jane Broadbent between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane Broadbent published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2005. 1 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2005. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1986 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jane Broadbent: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 3
1993 2
1994 5
1995 10
1996 2
1997 5
1998 5
1999 5
2000 1
2001 2
2002 5
2003 8
2004 11
2005 13
2006 4
2007 3
2008 3
2009 8
2010 7
2011 7
2012 6
2013 5
2014 2
2015 3
2016 3
2017 4
2018 0
2019 1
2020 2
2021 0
2022 1
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 140
Download as CSV

Jane Broadbent publications per year - data summary

  • Jane Broadbent, a Political Science scholar from Royal Holloway University of London, has 140 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2005, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1986, 1991, 2000, 2019 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 40 years in the span carry no publications at all (1987, 1988, 1989, 1990 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.2 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 3 publications, 2% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 39 publications (2.8 per year); 2000-2013: 83 publications (5.9 per year); 2014-2025: 18 publications (1.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Jane Broadbent publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Broadbent sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 126–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 126 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73 126
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Jane Broadbent publication distribution in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 36–40 to 333+ publications.
  • Jane Broadbent, a Political Science scholar from Royal Holloway University of London, records 126 publications - the 52nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 52% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Jane Broadbent, and about 48% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 121–125 publications range, and Jane Broadbent ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 333+ publications, holding 97 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 44% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 111–115 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 333 publications or more, 97 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Jane Broadbent D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Broadbent sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21 47
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Jane Broadbent D-index placement in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 43 ranges running from 20 to 62+ D-Index.
  • Jane Broadbent, a Political Science scholar from Royal Holloway University of London, records 47 D-Index - the 86th percentile of the discipline.
  • 86% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Jane Broadbent, and about 14% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 32 D-Index range, and Jane Broadbent ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62+ D-Index, holding 100 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 45% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 30 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Political Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Jane Broadbent is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences, including public administration, management information systems, general health professions, political science and international relations, and finance.

The scientist's work focuses on topics related to public policy and administration research, accounting and organizational management, patient satisfaction in healthcare, social policy and reform studies, and issues surrounding housing, finance, and neoliberalism.

Recent publications by Jane Broadbent include:

  • The response to Covid-19 in England: political accountability and loss of trust (2020), published in Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
  • Debate: Training for public audit (2022), published in Public Money & Management

Jane Broadbent has contributed notably to the following publication venues:

  • Public Money & Management
  • Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change

The scientist has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including:

  • Andrew Gray
  • Simon Roberts
  • Bruce Stafford

These collaborations align with the research themes present in Broadbent's recent papers and areas of study.

Best Publications

  • Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research

    Jane Broadbent;James Guthrie

  • Changes in the Public Sector: A Review of Recent“Alternative” Accounting Research

    Jane Broadbent;James Guthrie

  • Performance management systems: A conceptual model

    Jane Broadbent;Richard Laughlin

  • Research in Management Control: An Overview of its Development

    David Otley;Jane Broadbent;Anthony Berry

  • Public private partnerships: an introduction

    Jane Broadbent;Richard Laughlin

  • THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRINCIPAL–AGENT, CONTRACTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY RELATIONSHIPS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: CONCEPTUAL AND CULTURAL PROBLEMS

    Jane Broadbent;Michael Dietrich;Richard Laughlin

  • Management control : theories, issues and practices

    Anthony Berry;Jane Broadbent;David T. Otley

  • Recent financial and administrative changes in the NHS: A critical theory analysis

    Jane Broadbent;Richard Laughlin;Susan Read

  • Control and Legitimation in Government Accountability Processes: The Private Finance Initiative in the UK

    Jane Broadbent;Richard Laughlin

  • Resisting the “new public management”: Absorption and absorbing groups in schools and GP practices in the UK

    Jane Broadbent;Richard Laughlin

  • Organisational resistance strategies to unwanted accounting and finance changes: the case of general medical practice in the UK

    Jane Broadbent;Kerry Jacobs;Richard Laughlin

  • The Private Finance Initiative: Clarification of a Future Research Agenda

    Jane Broadbent;Richard Laughlin

  • The End of the Professions?: The Restructuring of Professional Work

    Jane Broadbent;Michael Dietrich;Jennifer Roberts

  • THE GENDERED NATURE OF ''ACCOUNTING LOGIC'': POINTERS TO AN ACCOUNTING THAT ENCOMPASSES MULTIPLE VALUES

    J. Broadbent

  • Developing empirical research: an example informed by a Habermasian approach

    Jane Broadbent;Richard Laughlin

  • Identifying and controlling risk: The problem of uncertainty in the private finance initiative in the UK's National Health Service

    Jane Broadbent;Jas Gill;Richard Laughlin

  • Evaluating the Private Finance Initiative in the National Health Service in the UK

    Jane Broadbent;Jas Gill;Richard Laughlin

  • Glass ceilings, glass cliffs or new worlds?

    Jane Broadbent;Linda Kirkham

  • Management control : theories, issues and performance

    Anthony J. Berry;Jane Broadbent;David T. Otley

  • Management control systems and research management in universities

    Gloria Agyemang;Jane Broadbent

  • Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector

    Jane Broadbent

  • Organisational Resistance Strategies to Unwanted Accounting and Finance Changes: The Case of General Medical Practice in the UK and New Zealand

    Jane Broadbent;Kerry Jacobs;Richard Laughlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Laughlin
Richard Laughlin King's College London
David Otley
David Otley Lancaster University
James Guthrie
James Guthrie University of Kansas
Kerry Jacobs
Kerry Jacobs University of New South Wales
Jennifer Roberts
Jennifer Roberts University of Sheffield
Jeffrey Unerman
Jeffrey Unerman Royal Holloway University of London
Chris Brooks
Chris Brooks University of Reading
Mahmoud Ezzamel
Mahmoud Ezzamel IE University
Vivien Beattie
Vivien Beattie Lancaster University
Peter F. Pope
Peter F. Pope Bocconi University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students passionate about Political Science often consider related degrees to broaden their skills and career prospects. A degree in history is a natural complement, offering valuable insight into political events, movements, and decision-making from a historical perspective.

For those seeking a more flexible curriculum, a cheap interdisciplinary studies degree online allows you to combine Political Science with other fields like economics, sociology, or philosophy. This can create a specialized skill set tailored to unique career aspirations.

Advancing your education is also possible with online history master's degrees. These programs can boost your qualifications for roles in higher education, research, or policy analysis while maintaining the flexibility of online study.

For quicker entry into the workforce, there are quick certifications that can complement your Political Science education. Certifications in project management, public administration, or data analysis can add practical skills and increase your earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Broadbent

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles