World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 42 1464 235 109 12231

Jeffrey Unerman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey Unerman between 1996 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey Unerman published across 26 years, from 1996 to 2021, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2014. 14 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2014. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 11 publications
1996 2021

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey Unerman: publications per year, 1996 to 2021
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 3
2005 2
2006 4
2007 9
2008 8
2009 4
2010 9
2011 8
2012 5
2013 3
2014 14
2015 5
2016 3
2017 5
2018 4
2019 2
2020 3
2021 11
Total 115
Download as CSV

Jeffrey Unerman publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey Unerman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 105–109 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 109 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113 109
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey Unerman D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey Unerman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80 42
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeffrey Unerman was affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focused on the field of Business, Management and Accounting, contributing a total of nine publications across several subfields including Strategy and Management, Marketing, Management Information Systems, Finance, and Accounting.

Their work covered key topics such as:

  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation

Unerman published four recent papers in recognized academic journals. These papers included:

  • "Advancing research into accounting and the UN Sustainable Development Goals" (2020), published in Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
  • "Shifting the focus of sustainability accounting from impacts to risks and dependencies: researching the transformative potential of TCFD reporting" (2020), published in Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
  • "Motivations for voluntary corporate adoption of integrated reporting: A novel context for comparing voluntary disclosure and legitimacy theory" (2021), published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Risks from self-referential peer review echo chambers developing in research fields" (2020), published in The British Accounting Review

These publications demonstrate engagement with sustainability accounting, voluntary disclosure, and peer review dynamics within research fields.

Frequent co-authors who collaborated with Unerman included Jan Bebbington, Brendan O'Dwyer, Kimitaka Nishitani, and Katsuhiko Kokubu. The most regular publication venues were Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Journal of Cleaner Production, and The British Accounting Review.

Best Publications

  • Methodological issues ‐ Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis

    Jeffrey Unerman

  • Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research

    Charl Johannes De Villiers;Leonardo Rinaldi;Jeffrey Unerman

  • Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?

    Jeffrey Unerman;Mark Bennett

  • Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research

    Jan Bebbington;Jeffrey Unerman

  • Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting

    Brendan O’Dwyer;David Owen;Jeffrey Unerman

  • The paradox of greater NGO accountability:A case study of Amnesty Ireland

    Brendan O’Dwyer;Jeffrey Unerman

  • Theorising accountability for NGO advocacy

    Jeffrey Unerman;Brendan O'Dwyer

  • Corporate reporting of intellectual capital: Evidence from UK companies

    Ludmila Striukova;Jeffrey Unerman;James Guthrie

  • Sustainability Accounting and Accountability

    Jan Bebbington;Jeffrey Unerman;Brendan O'Dwyer

  • User needs in sustainability reporting: Perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland

    Brendan O'Dwyer;Jeffrey Unerman;Elaine Hession

  • From functional to social accountability:Transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non-governmental development organisations

    Brendan O'Dwyer;Jeffrey Unerman

  • Accounting for Sustainability: Practical Insights

    Anthony G. Hopwood;Jeffrey Unerman;Jessica Fries

  • Evaluating the integrated reporting journey : insights, gaps and agendas for future research

    Leonardo Rinaldi;Jeffrey Unerman;Charl Johannes De Villiers

  • On James Bond and the importance of NGO accountability

    Jeffrey Unerman;Brendan O'Dwyer

  • Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland: Engaging the voices of non-governmental organisations

    Brendan O'Dwyer;Jeffrey Unerman;John Bradley

  • Strategic reputation risk management and corporate social responsibility reporting

    Jeffrey Unerman

  • Academic contributions to enhancing accounting for sustainable development

    Jeffrey Unerman;Christopher Chapman

  • Enhancing the role of accountability in promoting the rights of beneficiaries of development NGOs

    Brendan O'Dwyer;Jeffrey Unerman

  • Corporate reporting and accounting for externalities

    Jeffrey Unerman;Jan Bebbington;Brendan O’dwyer

  • Corporate Reporting of Intellectual Capital: Evidence from UK Companies

    Jeffrey Unerman;Jeffrey Unerman;Ludmila Striukova;James Guthrie;James Guthrie

Frequent Co-Authors

Brendan O'Dwyer
Brendan O'Dwyer University of Manchester
Jan Bebbington
Jan Bebbington University of St Andrews
James Guthrie
James Guthrie University of Kansas
Carol A. Tilt
Carol A. Tilt University of South Australia
Jane Broadbent
Jane Broadbent Royal Holloway University of London
Christopher Humphrey
Christopher Humphrey University of Manchester
Charl de Villiers
Charl de Villiers University of Auckland
Craig Deegan
Craig Deegan University of Tasmania
Robin W. Roberts
Robin W. Roberts University of Central Florida
David Owen
David Owen Swansea University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options in business and management opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities. Many students are choosing online business degrees for their flexibility and affordability, which allow learners to balance work and education more easily.

Accelerated programs are becoming increasingly popular. These options, such as accelerated degree programs, help students earn credentials faster without sacrificing quality. Specialized pathways like the online construction management accelerated program offer targeted skills and knowledge for specific industries in high demand.

For those interested in the healthcare sector, pursuing an online health administration degree can lead to management roles in hospitals, clinics, or insurance firms. When considering your next step, evaluate how each pathway aligns with your long-term career goals and lifestyle needs. Online programs continue to expand, creating accessible and rewarding options for business and management professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey Unerman

Recently Published Articles