World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 49 1023 953 153 134 139 15613

Jan Bebbington publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Bebbington between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Bebbington published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2007. 10 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2007. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 14 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1992 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Bebbington: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 4
1994 2
1995 2
1996 4
1997 5
1998 2
1999 3
2000 3
2001 13
2002 4
2003 6
2004 4
2005 1
2006 1
2007 14
2008 12
2009 11
2010 9
2011 4
2012 9
2013 8
2014 8
2015 2
2016 1
2017 5
2018 1
2019 2
2020 6
2021 9
2022 5
2023 4
2024 5
2025 5
Total 175
Download as CSV

Jan Bebbington publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Bebbington sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 135–139 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 139 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69 139
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Bebbington D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Bebbington sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58 49
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Jan Bebbington is affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Environmental Science, with a focus on the intersections of sustainability and organizational practices.

Bebbington has contributed extensively to the subfields of Strategy and Management, Marketing, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Management Information Systems. Their work addresses multiple topics including Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting, Environmental Sustainability in Business, Coastal and Marine Management, Accounting and Organizational Management, Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, Municipal Solid Waste Management, and Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies.

Their recent publications comprise:

  • Advancing research into accounting and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 2020, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
  • The pre-history of sustainability reporting: a constructivist reading, 2021, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
  • Transnational Corporations, Biosphere Stewardship, and Sustainable Futures, 2022, Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  • Hold big business to task on ecosystem restoration, 2023, Science
  • Evolving Perspectives of Stewardship in the Seafood Industry, 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science

Bebbington frequently publishes in venues such as Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, International Journal of Sustainable Development, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Science, and European Accounting Review.

Their collaborations include frequent coauthors such as Carlos Larrínaga, Robert Blasiak, Giovanna Michelon, Carl Folke, and Henrik Österblom. These professional partnerships contribute to the multidisciplinary nature of their research.

Recognition for their contributions includes being named a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Accounting for the Environment

    Rob Gray;Jan Bebbington;Martin Houldin

  • Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management

    Jan Bebbington;Carlos Larrinaga;Jose M. Moneva

  • Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research

    Jan Bebbington;Jeffrey Unerman

  • An account of sustainability: Failure, success and a reconceptualization

    Jan Bebbington;Rob Gray

  • NGOs, civil society and accountability: making the people accountable to capital

    Rob Gray;Jan Bebbington;David Collison

  • Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration

    Jan Bebbington;Carlos Larrinaga

  • Sustainable development: a review of the international development, business and accounting literature

    Jan Bebbington

  • Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting?

    Rob Gray;Jan Bebbington

  • Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models

    Jan Bebbington;Judy Brown;Bob Frame

  • Carbon Trading: Accounting and Reporting Issues

    Jan Bebbington;Carlos Larrinaga-González

  • Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach

    Jan Bebbington;Judy Brown;Bob Frame;Ian Hume Thomson

  • Social and environmental reporting in the UK: a pedagogic evaluation

    Ian Hume Thomson;Jan Bebbington

  • Accounting change or institutional appropriation?—A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting

    Carlos Larrinaga-Gonzalez;Jan Bebbington

  • The Greening of Enterprise: An Exploration of the (NON) Role of Environmental Accounting and Environmental Accountants in Organizational Change

    Rob Gray;Diane Walters;Jan Bebbington;Ian Thompson

  • Sustainability Accounting and Accountability

    Jan Bebbington;Jeffrey Unerman;Brendan O'Dwyer

  • Initiating sustainable development reporting: evidence from New Zealand

    Jan Bebbington;Colin Higgins;Bob Frame

  • Engagement, education and sustainability: A review essay on environmental accounting

    Jan Bebbington

  • Accountants' Attitudes and Environmentally-sensitive Accounting

    Jan Bebbington;Rob Gray;Ian Thomson;Diane Walters

  • The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK

    Jan Bebbington;Elizabeth A. Kirk;Carlos Larrinaga

  • Green Accounting: Cosmetic Irrelevance or Radical Agenda for Change?

    David Owen;Rob Gray;Jan Bebbington

  • Full cost accounting: an agenda for action

    Jan Bebbington;Rob Gray;Chris Hibbitt;Elizabeth Kirk

  • Social and Environmental Reporting in the UK: A Pedagogic Evaluation

    Jan Bebbington;Ian Thomson

Frequent Co-Authors

Rob Gray
Rob Gray University of East Anglia
Jeffrey Unerman
Jeffrey Unerman Royal Holloway University of London
Brendan O'Dwyer
Brendan O'Dwyer University of Manchester
Beatrice Crona
Beatrice Crona Stockholm University
Henrik Österblom
Henrik Österblom Stockholm University
Bert Scholtens
Bert Scholtens University of Groningen
David G. Reid
David G. Reid Memorial University of Newfoundland
David Owen
David Owen Swansea University
Andy Gouldson
Andy Gouldson University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Today’s rapidly evolving business landscape offers students a variety of flexible, affordable online pathways to further their education and advance their careers. Many accredited institutions provide options like cheap online master's programs, allowing professionals to upskill while managing work and personal commitments.

For those interested in the intersection of business and technology, online data science programs are increasingly popular, equipping graduates with analytical skills that are in high demand across industries. Aspiring leaders can chart a path towards the C-suite by pursuing a doctorate in organizational leadership online, gaining expertise in change management and executive decision-making.

When choosing an online program, accreditation is crucial. Be sure to consider the nationally accredited online universities that offer strong reputations and recognized qualifications. Taking the time to explore these online degree options can open doors to diverse and rewarding business and management career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Bebbington

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles