World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
126687
World Ranking
3650
National Ranking
359

James Larkin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Larkin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 629 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James Larkin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Larkin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James Larkin is a researcher affiliated with the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust in the United Kingdom. Their work spans several domains primarily within medicine, with a focus on oncology and related biomedical sciences.

Their research contributions are distributed across key fields of study including Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these broader areas, they have concentrated on subfields such as Oncology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Immunology, and Cancer Research.

Larkin's main topics of investigation include Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, CAR-T cell therapy research, Renal cell carcinoma treatment, Melanoma and MAPK Pathways, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Immunotherapy and Immune Responses, and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management.

The scientist has published extensively, with frequent appearances in prominent scientific journals. Key publication venues include the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, European Journal of Cancer, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, and ESMO Open.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by James Larkin demonstrate a focus on immunotherapy and cancer treatment strategies:

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma (2021, The Lancet)
  • Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (2022, Annals of Oncology)
  • Meta-analysis of tumor- and T cell-intrinsic mechanisms of sensitization to checkpoint inhibition (2021, Cell)
  • Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma (2022, Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich))
  • Collateral damage: the impact on outcomes from cancer surgery of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, Annals of Oncology)

James Larkin frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Notable co-authors include Samra Turajlic, Paolo A. Ascierto, Georgina V. Long, Lisa Pickering, and Dirk Schadendorf, indicating involvement in collaborative studies and multi-author research projects.

Best Publications

  • Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation

    Paul B. Chapman;Axel Hauschild;Caroline Robert;John B. Haanen

  • Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing.

    Marco Gerlinger;Andrew J. Rowan;Stuart Horswell;James Larkin

  • Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma.

    James Larkin;Vanna Chiarion-Sileni;Rene Gonzalez;Jean Jacques Grob

  • Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

    Robert J. Motzer;Bernard Escudier;David F. McDermott;Saby George

  • Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

    Caroline Robert;Caroline Robert;Caroline Robert;Jacob Schachter;Georgina V. Long;Ana Arance

  • Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

    Jedd D. Wolchok;Vanna Chiarion-Sileni;Rene Gonzalez;Piotr Rutkowski

  • Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: New England Journal of Medicine

    J. Larkin;V. Chiarion-Sileni;R. Gonzalez;J.-J. Grob

  • Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

    Jeffrey S Weber;Sandra P D'Angelo;David Minor;F Stephen Hodi

  • Improved Survival with MEK Inhibition in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma

    Keith T. Flaherty;Caroline Robert;Peter Hersey;Paul Nathan

  • Combined Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma

    James Larkin;Paolo A. Ascierto;Brigitte Dréno;Victoria Atkinson

  • Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

    Robert J. Motzer;Konstantin Penkov;John Haanen;Brian Rini

  • Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    J. B. A. G. Haanen;F. Carbonnel;C. Robert;K. M. Kerr

  • Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma

    Jeffrey Weber;Mario Mandala;Michele Del Vecchio;Helen J. Gogas

  • Improved survival with MEK Inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma for the METRIC Study Group

    K T Flaherty;C Robert;P Hersey;P Nathan;P Nathan

  • Renal cell carcinoma.

    James J. Hsieh;Mark P. Purdue;Sabina Signoretti;Charles Swanton

  • Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition versus BRAF Inhibition Alone in Melanoma

    G.V. Long;D. Stroyakovskiy;H. Gogas;E. Levchenko

  • Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected Stage III Melanoma

    Alexander M.M. Eggermont;Christian U. Blank;Mario Mandala;Georgina V. Long

  • Dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib and placebo for Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma: a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial

    Georgina V. Long;Georgina V. Long;Daniil Stroyakovskiy;Helen Gogas;Evgeny Levchenko

  • Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III BRAF-Mutated Melanoma

    G. V. Long;A. Hauschild;M. Santinami;V. Atkinson

  • Genomic architecture and evolution of clear cell renal cell carcinomas defined by multiregion sequencing

    Marco Gerlinger;Stuart Horswell;James Larkin;Andrew J Rowan

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Gore
Martin Gore Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Samra Turajlic
Samra Turajlic Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Georgina V. Long
Georgina V. Long University of Sydney
Paolo A. Ascierto
Paolo A. Ascierto National Institutes of Health
Caroline Robert
Caroline Robert University of Paris-Saclay
Paul Lorigan
Paul Lorigan University of Manchester
Dirk Schadendorf
Dirk Schadendorf University of Duisburg-Essen
Charles Swanton
Charles Swanton The Francis Crick Institute
Grant A. McArthur
Grant A. McArthur Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Antoni Ribas
Antoni Ribas University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring health-related careers in the USA goes beyond just medical school. Many students choose online degrees for flexibility, diverse specializations, and accessibility. For example, those interested in food, health, and wellness can turn to an online nutrition degree to enter fields like public health or dietetics.

Another growing area is healthcare management. Understanding how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs is essential for aspiring leaders in hospitals, clinics, and health systems. Accreditation, curriculum, and practical experience all matter when making your choice.

Nursing is a vital pathway, with flexible options like an rn to bsn without clinicals for registered nurses who want to advance their credentials quickly from home. For those seeking advanced practice, pursuing the shortest msn to dnp program can help fast-track your journey to a doctoral degree in nursing.

By considering these alternative online degrees, you open up multiple rewarding career paths within the health and medical sector—many of which offer high demand, job security, and personal fulfillment.

Best Scientists Citing James Larkin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles