World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
71189
World Ranking
10638
National Ranking
1015

Paul Lorigan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Lorigan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 553 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul Lorigan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Lorigan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Lorigan is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on Oncology, Molecular Biology, and Immunology. They have also contributed notably to Epidemiology and Cancer Research.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • European Journal of Cancer
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Annals of Oncology
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • British Journal of Dermatology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul Lorigan include:

  • Paolo A. Ascierto
  • Georgina V. Long
  • Mario Mandalà
  • James Larkin
  • Caroline Robert

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul Lorigan include:

  • Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Recurrence-Free Survival Among Patients With Stage III Melanoma Randomized to Receive Pembrolizumab or Placebo, 2020, JAMA Oncology
  • Cross-cohort gut microbiome associations with immune checkpoint inhibitor response in advanced melanoma, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, 2021, The Lancet Oncology
  • European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics: Update 2022, 2022, European Journal of Cancer
  • Longer Follow-Up Confirms Recurrence-Free Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in High-Risk Stage III Melanoma: Updated Results From the EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054 Trial, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

    F. Stephen Hodi;Steven J. O'Day;David F. McDermott;Robert W. Weber

  • Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation

    Paul B. Chapman;Axel Hauschild;Caroline Robert;John B. Haanen

  • Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

    Caroline Robert;Caroline Robert;Caroline Robert;Jacob Schachter;Georgina V. Long;Ana Arance

  • Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

    Jeffrey S Weber;Sandra P D'Angelo;David Minor;F Stephen Hodi

  • Improved Overall Survival in Melanoma with Combined Dabrafenib and Trametinib

    Caroline Robert;Boguslawa Karaszewska;Jacob Schachter;Piotr Rutkowski

  • Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Placebo in Resected Stage III Melanoma

    Alexander M.M. Eggermont;Christian U. Blank;Mario Mandala;Georgina V. Long

  • Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006)

    Jacob Schachter;Antoni Ribas;Georgina V. Long;Ana Arance

  • Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAFV600E and BRAFV600K mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study

    Grant A McArthur;Paul B Chapman;Caroline Robert;James Larkin

  • Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study

    Caroline Robert;Antoni Ribas;Jacob Schachter;Ana Arance

  • Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Tremelimumab With Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

    Antoni Ribas;Richard Kefford;Margaret A. Marshall;Cornelis J.A. Punt

  • Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Alone or in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Mucosal Melanoma: A Pooled Analysis

    Sandra P D'Angelo;James Larkin;Jeffrey A Sosman;Celeste Lebbé

  • Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Who Received Nivolumab Versus Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in CheckMate 037: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase III Trial.

    James Larkin;David Minor;Sandra D'Angelo;Bart Neyns

  • Phase II Study of ET-743 in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Trial

    A. Le Cesne;J.Y. Blay;I. Judson;A. Van Oosterom

  • Phase III Randomized Trial of Ipilimumab Plus Etoposide and Platinum Versus Placebo Plus Etoposide and Platinum in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

    Martin Reck;Alexander Luft;Aleksandra Szczesna;Libor Havel

  • Concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (CONVERT): an open-label, phase 3, randomised, superiority trial

    Corinne Faivre-Finn;Michael Snee;Linda Ashcroft;Wiebke Appel

  • Revised U.K. guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma 2010.

    J.R. Marsden;J.A. Newton-Bishop;L. Burrows;M. Cook

  • Inhibiting EGF Receptor or SRC Family Kinase Signaling Overcomes BRAF Inhibitor Resistance in Melanoma

    Maria R. Girotti;Malin Pedersen;Berta Sanchez-Laorden;Amaya Viros

  • Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Recurrence-Free Survival Among Patients With Stage III Melanoma Randomized to Receive Pembrolizumab or Placebo: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

    Alexander M.M. Eggermont;Michal Kicinski;Christian U. Blank;Mario Mandala

  • Chemotherapy compared with biochemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma: a meta-analysis of 18 trials involving 2,621 patients.

    Natalie J Ives;Rebecca L Stowe;Paul C Lorigan;Keith Wheatley

  • Revised UK guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma 2010

    J R Marsden;J A Newton-Bishop;L Burrows;M Cook

Frequent Co-Authors

James Larkin
James Larkin Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Nick Thatcher
Nick Thatcher University of Manchester
Fiona H Blackhall
Fiona H Blackhall University of Manchester
Georgina V. Long
Georgina V. Long University of Sydney
Caroline Robert
Caroline Robert University of Paris-Saclay
Paolo A. Ascierto
Paolo A. Ascierto National Institutes of Health
Dirk Schadendorf
Dirk Schadendorf University of Duisburg-Essen
Mark R. Middleton
Mark R. Middleton University of Oxford
Claus Garbe
Claus Garbe University of Tübingen
Matteo S. Carlino
Matteo S. Carlino University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As medical careers evolve, many students look to online education for flexibility and affordability. There is a growing range of online healthcare degrees that open doors to rewarding roles outside traditional physician paths. For example, many aspiring healthcare professionals consider how much does it cost to become a medical coder. Medical coding is an entry point for those interested in healthcare administration and can be pursued entirely online at a lower cost compared to clinical degrees.

Nursing remains a top choice for those who want to work directly with patients. If budget is a concern, students often research cheap np programs to become Nurse Practitioners or explore cheapest bsn programs online for Bachelor of Science in Nursing options. Even advanced roles are accessible, such as obtaining a terminal degree through cheapest online dnp programs for a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

With diverse and affordable online pathways, students can tailor their educational journeys to fit both their career goals and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Lorigan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles