World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
9632
World Ranking
8423
National Ranking
4500

Irving E. Sigel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irving E. Sigel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Irving E. Sigel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irving E. Sigel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Irving E. Sigel is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. The scholar's academic profile illustrates a career grounded in their institutional association but does not include recent papers, frequent co-authors, specific publication venues, or detailed research subfields. This suggests a focus that may extend beyond high-output publishing or that their contributions are documented in formats not captured here.

Without specific records of book publications or awards, the profile of Irving E. Sigel reflects a scientist whose public academic footprint centers primarily on their role at Princeton University. The absence of data on main and subfields of study or defined research topics limits the ability to pinpoint particular scientific contributions or thematic expertise.

Irving E. Sigel's profile does not list any recent scholarly papers or frequent collaborators, which might indicate work in more foundational or diverse areas that have not been aggregated in this dataset. The lack of recorded main research topics or fields also suggests the possibility of interdisciplinary approaches or a focus on teaching or administrative roles within the academic institution.

The profile omits specific publication venues and awards, which often serve as markers of research impact or thematic focus. This information gap makes it challenging to provide a detailed map of their scientific output or recognition but aligns with a profile focused on academic affiliation rather than measurable research metrics.

Best Publications

  • Parental belief systems: the psychological consequences for children

    Irving E. Sigel;Ann V. McGillicuddy-DeLisi;Jacqueline J Goodnow

  • Psychological significance of styles of conceptualization.

    Unknown

  • Marital quality and mother–child and father–child interactions with school-aged children.

    Gene H. Brody;Anthony D. Pellegrini;Irving E. Sigel

  • Advances in applied developmental psychology

    Irving E. Sigel

  • Handbook Of Child Psychology: Child Psychology In Practice

    I. E. Sigel;K. Ann Renninger

  • The Relationship between Parental Distancing Strategies and the Child's Cognitive Behavior

    Irving E. Sigel

  • Families as learning environments for children

    Luis M. Laosa;Irving E. Sigel

  • Parents' book-reading habits with their children.

    Anthony D. Pellegrini;Gene H. Brody;Irving E. Sigel

  • Parent beliefs are cognitions: The dynamic belief systems model.

    Irving E. Sigel;Ann V. McGillicuddy-De Lisi

  • Educating the Young Thinker: Classroom Strategies for Cognitive Growth

    Carol Copple;Irving E. Sigel;Ruth A. Saunders

  • Child psychology in practice

    K. Ann Renninger;Irving E. Sigel

  • Cognitive development from childhood to adolescence : a constructivist perspective

    Irving E. Sigel;Rodney R. Cocking

  • Logical Thinking in Children

    Edith D. Neimark;Irving E. Sigel;F. H. Hooper

  • The centrality of a distancing model for the development of representational competence.

    Irving E. Sigel

  • A training procedure for acquisition of Piaget's conservation of quantity: a pilot study and its replication.

    Irving E. Sigel;Annemarie Roeper;Frank H. Hooper

  • The development of natural language concepts.

    Eli Saltz;Elaine Soller;Irving E. Sigel

  • Parent education as early childhood intervention : emerging directions in theory, research and practice

    Douglas R. Powell;Irving E. Sigel

  • Parental Distancing, Beliefs and Children's Representational Competence Within the Family Context.

    Irving E. Sigel;Ann V. McGillicuddy-De Lisi;James E. Johnson

  • New directions in Piagetian theory and practice

    Irving E. Sigel;David Brodzinsky;Roberta M. Golinkoff

  • An objective method for the measurement and analysis of child-adult interaction.

    Clark E. Moustakas;Irving E. Sigel;Henry D. Schalock

  • Families as Learning Environments for Children

    Gary W. Ladd;Louis M. Laosa;Irving E. Sigel

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacqueline J. Goodnow
Jacqueline J. Goodnow Macquarie University
Gene H. Brody
Gene H. Brody University of Georgia
Anthony D. Pellegrini
Anthony D. Pellegrini University of Minnesota
James E. Johnson
James E. Johnson National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Celia B. Fisher
Celia B. Fisher Fordham University
Michael A. Smyer
Michael A. Smyer Bucknell University
Gary W. Ladd
Gary W. Ladd Arizona State University
Samuel Messick
Samuel Messick Princeton University
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff University of Delaware
George W. Rebok
George W. Rebok Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and diverse career paths across the U.S. One rapidly growing field is substance abuse counseling. It’s important to know that education and certification requirements for this role vary by state and city.

For example, Port St. Lucie substance abuse counselors education requirements focus on state-approved training and hands-on experience, while substance abuse counselor requirements in Portland include specific degree prerequisites and supervised clinical hours.

Meanwhile, Raleigh substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize academic credentials and ongoing professional development. Reno substance abuse counselor certification requirements highlight a mix of academic study, fieldwork, and exams.

By selecting an accredited online degree, students gain the flexibility to meet regional licensure needs and pursue rewarding roles in counseling, mental health, and related fields across the nation.

Best Scientists Citing Irving E. Sigel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles