World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roberto Aguilera

Roberto Aguilera

Roberto Aguilera publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Aguilera sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Roberto Aguilera D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Aguilera sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roberto Aguilera is affiliated with Curtin University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, with specific focus on hydraulic fracturing, reservoir analysis, and related topics. Their research spans several interconnected areas, including ocean engineering, mechanical engineering, mechanics of materials, molecular biology, and geophysics.

Their work has been published predominantly in venues related to petroleum engineering and reservoir studies. Frequent publication venues include:

  • SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference
  • SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
  • SPE Journal
  • Preprints.org
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Aguilera's research topics cover:

  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Extracellular Vesicles in Disease
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Naturally Fractured Reservoirs and their Link to Tight and Shale Petroleum Reservoirs" (2020) published at SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference
  • "Simultaneous enhanced oil recovery, CCUS and UHUS in shale oil reservoirs" (2023) published in the International Journal of Coal Geology
  • "Life Cycle Assessment of Improved Oil Recovery While Helping to Achieve Net Zero Emissions from Shale Reservoirs" (2023) published in SPE Journal
  • "Machine Learning Applied to SRV Modeling, Fracture Characterization, Well Interference and Production Forecasting in Low Permeability Reservoirs" (2020) published at SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference
  • "Optimization of Recovery by Huff 'n' Puff Gas Injection in Shale-Oil Reservoirs Using the Climbing-Swarm Derivative-Free Algorithm" (2020) published in SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering

They frequently collaborate with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Ider Rivadeneira
  • Francisco Krakowiak
  • Ramón Gutiérrez-Sandoval
  • Ariel Sobarzo
  • Jordan Iturra

Best Publications

  • Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

    Roberto Aguilera

  • Knudsen’s Permeability Correction for Tight Porous Media

    Ali S. Ziarani;Roberto Aguilera

  • Flow Units: From Conventional to Tight-Gas to Shale-Gas to Tight-Oil to Shale-Oil Reservoirs

    Roberto Aguilera

  • Depletion and the future availability of petroleum resources

    Roberto F. Aguilera;Roderick G. Eggert;C C Gustavo Lagos;John E. Tilton

  • Incorporating capillary pressure, pore throat aperture radii, height above free-water table, and Winland r35 values on Pickett plots

    Roberto Aguilera

  • Modeling Fractured Horizontal Wells As Dual Porosity Composite Reservoirs – Application to Tight Gas, Shale Gas and Tight Oil Cases

    Imad Ghani Brohi;Mehran Pooladi-Darvish;Roberto Aguilera

  • Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs From Conventional Well Logs(includes associated papers 6420 and 6421 )

    R. Aguilera

  • An Improved Triple-Porosity Model for Evaluation of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

    Ali Al-Ghamdi;Bo Chen;Hamish Behmanesh;Farhad Qanbari

  • Energy Resources and Potentials

    H. Rogner;Roberto F. Aguilera;C. Archer;R. Bertani

  • A New Unified Diffusion--Viscous-Flow Model Based on Pore-Level Studies of Tight Gas Formations

    Mohammad R. Rahmanian;Roberto Aguilera;Apostolos Kantzas

  • Flow Units: From Conventional to Tight Gas to Shale Gas Reservoirs

    Roberto Aguilera

  • A New Unified Diffusion-Viscous Flow Model Based on Pore Level Studies of Tight Gas Formations

    Mohammad Reza Rahmanian Shahri;Roberto Aguilera;Apostolos Kantzas

  • Geologic aspects of naturally fractured reservoirs

    Roberto Aguilera

  • Improved Models for Petrophysical Analysis of Dual Porosity Reservoirs

    Maria Silvia Aguilera;Roberto Aguilera

  • A Triple Porosity Model for Petrophysical Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

    Roberto F. Aguilera;Roberto Aguilera

  • Pore-throat radius and tortuosity estimation from formation resistivity data for tight-gas sandstone reservoirs

    Ali S. Ziarani;Roberto Aguilera

  • Recovery factors and reserves in naturally fractured reservoirs

    R. Aguilera

  • Cumulative-Gas-Production Distribution on the Nikanassin Tight Gas Formation, Alberta and British Columbia, Canada

    Nisael Solano;Liliana Zambrano;Roberto Aguilera

  • Link between endowments, economics and environment in conventional and unconventional gas reservoirs

    Roberto F. Aguilera;Ronald D. Ripple;Roberto Aguilera

  • The Integration Of Capillary Pressures And Pickett Plots For Determination Of Flow Units And Reservoir Containers

    R. Aguilera;M.S. Aguilera

  • Investigating the effect of sorption time on coalbed methane recovery through numerical simulation

    Ali S. Ziarani;Roberto Aguilera;Chris R. Clarkson

  • Storage And Output Flow From Shale And Tight Gas Reservoirs

    Mohammad Reza Rahmanian;Nisael Solano;Roberto Aguilera

  • An Improved Triple Porosity Model for Evaluation of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

    Ali Al-Ghamdi;Bo Chen;Hamid Behmanesh;Farhad Qanbari

  • Integration of geology, petrophysics, and reservoir engineering for characterization of carbonate reservoirs through Pickett plots

    Roberto Aguilera

  • Well Test Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs

    Unknown

  • Analysis of naturally fractured reservoirs from conventional well logs

    Unknown

  • Shale gas reservoirs: Theoretical, practical and research issues

    Roberto Aguilera

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher R. Clarkson
Christopher R. Clarkson University of Calgary
John E. Tilton
John E. Tilton Colorado School of Mines
John S. Oldow
John S. Oldow Western Washington University
Apostolos Kantzas
Apostolos Kantzas University of Calgary
Maen M. Husein
Maen M. Husein University of Calgary
John W. Cosgrove
John W. Cosgrove Imperial College London
Mohamed Y. Soliman
Mohamed Y. Soliman University of Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA naturally leads many students to consider complementary degrees and career paths. For those interested in creative and visual aspects of the Earth, programs like military friendly online photography degree programs offer a unique blend of technical skills and artistic expression, useful in environmental documentation and geographic studies.

Language skills are also valuable in Earth Science careers, especially for those working in global settings. Pursuing an online Spanish degrees for veterans or more general online degree in Spanish can open doors to international collaboration, research, and communication.

Moreover, Earth Science students with creative interests might consider one of the mfa online programs to enhance skills in areas like scientific visualization, environmental writing, or multimedia storytelling.

By combining Earth Science with these related online degrees, students can diversify their expertise, making them well-rounded professionals prepared for a variety of rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Aguilera

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles