World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 47 1155 1075 504 458 144 10609

Henry C. Lucas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henry C. Lucas between 1971 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henry C. Lucas published across 54 years, from 1971 to 2024, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2016. 1 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2016. 1971: 2 publications 1972: 5 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 9 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 13 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1971 2024

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henry C. Lucas: publications per year, 1971 to 2024
Year Publications
1971 2
1972 5
1973 4
1974 9
1975 3
1976 2
1977 5
1978 4
1979 5
1980 2
1981 2
1982 2
1983 4
1984 2
1985 5
1986 5
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 3
1991 1
1992 2
1993 5
1994 4
1995 2
1996 8
1997 2
1998 0
1999 4
2000 4
2001 3
2002 3
2003 1
2004 13
2005 4
2006 1
2007 2
2008 4
2009 1
2010 4
2011 6
2012 2
2013 4
2014 3
2015 2
2016 15
2017 4
2018 0
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 177
Download as CSV

Henry C. Lucas publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry C. Lucas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 140–144 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 144 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80 144
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Henry C. Lucas D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry C. Lucas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69 47
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Henry C. Lucas is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans various topics within computer science, focusing primarily on information systems and computational mechanics.

The main fields and subfields of study in Lucas's work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Information Systems
  • Management Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computational Mechanics

Key topics addressed in their research encompass:

  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions

Lucas has contributed to several publications in notable venues, with a focus on both theoretical and applied aspects of information systems and computer science. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Management Information Systems
  • ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
  • IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lucas include:

  • Modelling of flow characteristics in the access channel of Bali tourism port using DualSPHysics, 2024, IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science
  • Early Exploration of MOOCs in the U.S. Higher Education: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective, 2021, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
  • Centralized IT Decision Making and Cybersecurity Breaches: Evidence from U.S. Higher Education Institutions, 2020, Journal of Management Information Systems

Lucas collaborates with multiple frequent co-authors, highlighting a network of research partnerships that support interdisciplinary investigation. These include:

  • Peng Huang
  • Che-Wei Liu
  • Muhammad Hafiz Aslami
  • Farell Farell
  • Ferryanto Ferryanto

Best Publications

  • Research Commentary---Too Big to Fail: Large Samples and the p-Value Problem

    Mingfeng Lin;Henry C. Lucas;Galit Shmueli

  • Disruptive technology: how Kodak missed the digital photography revolution

    Henry C. Lucas;Jie Mein Goh

  • Technology Use and Performance: A Field Study of Broker Workstations*

    Henry C. Lucas;V.K. Spitler

  • The information systems identity crisis: focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research

    Ritu Agarwall;Henry C. Lucas

  • Impactful research on transformational information technology: an opportunity to inform new audiences

    Henry C. Lucas;Ritu Agarwal;Eric K. Clemons;Omar A. El Sawy

  • Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementation

    Henry C. Lucas

  • The role of information technology in organization design

    Henry C. Lucas;Jack Baroudi

  • Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems

    Henry C. Lucas

  • Implementing packaged software

    Henry C. Lucas;Eric J.. Walton;Michael J. Ginzberg

  • The value of IT-enabled retailer learning: personalized product recommendations and customer store loyalty in electronic markets

    Tongxiao Zhang;Ritu Agarwal;Henry C. Lucas

  • An Experimental Investigation of the Use of Computer-Based Graphics in Decision Making

    Henry C. Lucas

  • Information Systems Implementation: Testing a Structural Model

    Henry C. Lucas;Michael J. Ginzberg;Radnall L. Schultz

  • The impact of office automation on the organization: some implications for research and practice

    Margrethe H. Olson;Henry C. Lucas

  • Implementation, Innovation, and Related Themes Over The Years In Information Systems Research

    Henry C. Lucas;E. Burton Swanson;Robert W. Zmud

  • Analyzing Enterprise Resource Planning System Implementation Success Factors in the Engineering–Construction Industry

    Boo Young Chung;Mirioslaw J Skibniewski;Henry C Lucas Jr;Young Hoon Kwak

  • Implementation in a world of workstations and networks

    Henry C. Lucas;Valerie Spitler

  • Information Technology and the Productivity Paradox: Assessing the Value of Investing in IT

    Henry C. Lucas

  • System response time operator productivity, and job satisfaction

    Raymond E. Barber;Henry C. Lucas

  • Appropriating Value from Computerized Reservation System Ownership in the Airline Industry

    Katherine A. Duliba;Robert J. Kauffman;Henry C. Lucas

  • The Impact of E-Commerce on Competition in the Retail Brokerage Industry

    Yannis Bakos;Henry C. Lucas;Wonseok Oh;Gary Simon

  • Are Foreign IT Workers Cheaper? U.S. Visa Policies and Compensation of Information Technology Professionals

    Sunil Mithas;Henry C. Lucas

Frequent Co-Authors

Sunil Mithas
Sunil Mithas University of South Florida
Robert J. Kauffman
Robert J. Kauffman Singapore Management University
Matthias Jarke
Matthias Jarke RWTH Aachen University
Robert E. Kraut
Robert E. Kraut Carnegie Mellon University
Charles B. Weinberg
Charles B. Weinberg University of British Columbia
Ritu Agarwal
Ritu Agarwal Johns Hopkins University
Galit Shmueli
Galit Shmueli National Tsing Hua University
Helmut Krcmar
Helmut Krcmar Technical University of Munich
Raghu Garud
Raghu Garud Pennsylvania State University
Varun Grover
Varun Grover University of Arkansas at Fayetteville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in business and management opens doors to diverse and flexible career options. Many students opt for accelerated programs, like fast track college programs, which allow for a quicker transition into the workforce. These programs are ideal for motivated learners eager to advance their careers efficiently.

Specialized management fields are also gaining popularity. Degrees such as a 2 year construction management degree provide focused expertise for industries experiencing rapid growth. Similarly, healthcare professionals are increasingly pursuing an online healthcare management degree, positioning themselves for leadership in a vital sector.

Affordability is another important factor to consider. With a wide range of online business degrees now available, students can find programs that suit their budget and career ambitions. Online education in business and management provides practical knowledge, flexibility, and versatile career pathways tailored to today’s evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Henry C. Lucas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles