World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
5579
World Ranking
8884
National Ranking
208

Fred C. Bosveld publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred C. Bosveld sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Fred C. Bosveld D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred C. Bosveld sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fred C. Bosveld is affiliated with the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute in the Netherlands. Their research primarily centers on atmospheric and environmental sciences, with a strong focus on meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Their work spans several interconnected fields of study, including:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Environmental Science

Within these broader areas, their subfield expertise includes:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Oceanography

Key research topics explored by Bosveld include:

  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Wind and Air Flow Studies
  • Climate Variability and Models
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bosveld are:

  • A.A.M. Holtslag
  • Evert I. F. de Bruijn
  • Siebren de Haan
  • B.J.H. van de Wiel
  • B.G. Heusinkveld

Bosveld has published in a variety of scientific journals. The venues in which multiple works have appeared include:

  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Other publication venues featuring Bosveld's work are:

  • Water Resources Research
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Recent papers by Fred C. Bosveld include:

  • "Fifty Years of Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Research at Cabauw Serving Weather, Air Quality and Climate" (2020), Boundary-Layer Meteorology
  • "Land Cover Control on the Drivers of Evaporation and Sensible Heat Fluxes: An Observation-Based Synthesis for the Netherlands" (2023), Water Resources Research
  • "Surface-Layer Wind Shear and Momentum Transport From Clear-Sky to Cloudy Weather Regimes Over Land" (2021), Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • "Measuring Low-Altitude Winds with a Hot-Air Balloon and Their Validation with Cabauw Tower Observations" (2020), Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
  • "Heat Transfer Through Grass: A Diffusive Approach" (2022), Boundary-Layer Meteorology

Best Publications

  • Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layers and Diurnal Cycles: Challenges for Weather and Climate Models

    A. A. M. Holtslag;Gunilla Svensson;P. Baas;S. Basu

  • The KNMI regional atmospheric climate model RACMO version 2.1

    E. van Meijgaard;F. C. Bosveld;G. Lenderink

  • Water storage and evaporation as constituents of rainfall interception

    Wim Klaassen;Fred Bosveld;E. de Water

  • A Conceptual View on Inertial Oscillations and Nocturnal Low-Level Jets

    van de Bjh Bas Wiel;AF Arnold Moene;GJ Steeneveld;P Baas

  • A Climatology of Nocturnal Low-Level Jets at Cabauw

    P. Baas;F. C. Bosveld;H. Klein Baltink;A. A. M. Holtslag

  • Cabauw Data for the Validation of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes

    Anton C. M. Beljaars;Fred C. Bosveld

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • Observations Of The Morning Transition Of The Convective Boundary Layer

    Wayne M. Angevine;Henk Klein Baltink;Fred C. Bosveld

  • Variability of annual CO 2 exchange from Dutch grasslands

    C. M. J. Jacobs;A. F. G. Jacobs;F. C. Bosveld;D. M. D. Hendriks

  • Diurnal and vertical variability of the sensible heat and carbon dioxide budgets in the atmospheric surface layer

    Pau Casso-Torralba;Pau Casso-Torralba;Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano;Fred Bosveld;Maria Rosa Soler

  • The Third GABLS Intercomparison Case for Evaluation Studies of Boundary-Layer Models. Part B: Results and Process Understanding

    Fred C. Bosveld;Peter Baas;Gert-Jan Steeneveld;Albert A. M. Holtslag

  • Modeling daily gas exchange of a Douglas-fir forest: comparison of three stomatal conductance models with and without a soil water stress function.

    M. T. Van Wijk;S. C. Dekker;W. Bouten;F. C. Bosveld

  • Measurement of the dry deposition flux of NH3 on to coniferous forest

    J.H. Duyzer;H.L.M. Verhagen;J.H. Weststrate;F.C. Bosveld

  • Uncertainties in eddy covariance flux measurements assessed from CH4 and N2O observations

    P. S. Kroon;P. S. Kroon;A. Hensen;H. J. J. Jonker;H. G. Ouwersloot;H. G. Ouwersloot

  • A Year-Long Large-Eddy Simulation of the Weather over Cabauw: An Overview

    Unknown

  • The dry deposition of ammonia onto a Douglas fir forest in the Netherlands

    J.H. Duyzer;H.L.M. Verhagen;J.H. Weststrate;F.C. Bosveld

  • Microwave transmission, a new tool in forest hydrological research

    W. Bouten;P.J.F. Swart;E. De Water

  • Key parameters for the life cycle of nocturnal radiation fog: a comprehensive large-eddy simulation study

    B. Maronga;F. C. Bosveld

  • Shear Capacity as Prognostic for Nocturnal Boundary Layer Regimes

    Ivo G. S. van Hooijdonk;Judith M. M. Donda;Herman J. H. Clercx;Fred C. Bosveld

  • Regime transitions in near-surface temperature inversions : a conceptual model

    Bas J. H. Van de Wiel;Etienne Vignon;Etienne Vignon;Peter Baas;Ivo G. S. van Hooijdonk

  • The Baltic Sea Experiment (BALTEX): A European Contribution to the Investigation of the Energy and Water Cycle over a Large Drainage Basin

    E. Raschke;J. Meywerk;K. Warrach;U. Andrea

  • Evaluation of transpiration models with observations over a Douglas fir forest

    F.C Bosveld;W Bouten

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert A. M. Holtslag
Albert A. M. Holtslag Wageningen University & Research
Alex Vermeulen
Alex Vermeulen Lund University
Gert-Jan Steeneveld
Gert-Jan Steeneveld Wageningen University & Research
Eddy Moors
Eddy Moors Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Carole Helfter
Carole Helfter UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Remko Uijlenhoet
Remko Uijlenhoet Delft University of Technology
Jan A. Elbers
Jan A. Elbers Wageningen University & Research
Anders Lindroth
Anders Lindroth Lund University
Thomas Röckmann
Thomas Röckmann Utrecht University
Eiko Nemitz
Eiko Nemitz UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often opens doors to diverse career options. For those interested in spatial data analysis and environmental mapping, pursuing a gis degree offers practical skills driving modern environmental research and management.

Leadership roles in public policy and environmental governance can be enhanced through advanced studies like online mpa degrees. These programs focus on public administration skills critical for shaping sustainable policies at local, state, or federal levels.

Understanding social dynamics and community impacts is vital in environmental work. An online sociology degree bachelors can provide valuable insights into human behavior, enhancing the effectiveness of environmental initiatives.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise without the time-intensive research component, online doctoral options such as online ed d programs without dissertation deliver advanced leadership and research skills relevant to environmental education and administration roles.

Choosing one of these related degrees can significantly broaden career pathways, supporting a strong, interdisciplinary approach to environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Fred C. Bosveld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles