World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 63 10185 9406 737 693 195 14736

Markus Hoth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Markus Hoth between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Markus Hoth published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 131 publications in 2010. 15 of the 356 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 131. Peak 131 publications in 2010. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 8 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 131 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
1991 2025

356 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Markus Hoth: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 8
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 1
1999 1
2000 4
2001 1
2002 3
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 3
2007 7
2008 4
2009 7
2010 131
2011 14
2012 10
2013 12
2014 9
2015 7
2016 9
2017 25
2018 5
2019 5
2020 10
2021 29
2022 8
2023 11
2024 7
2025 8
Total 356
Download as CSV

Markus Hoth publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Hoth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 195 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787 195
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Markus Hoth D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Hoth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130 63
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Physiology and Pharmacology/Toxicology

Overview

Markus Hoth is affiliated with Saarland University in Germany and has a broad research profile spanning several interrelated biomedical fields. Their work encompasses studies across Medicine, Immunology and Microbiology, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a notable focus on Immunology as a subfield.

The research topics Markus Hoth has focused on include diverse areas within immune cell biology and related medical applications. These topics are:

  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules Research

Their frequent coauthors include Bin Qu, Renping Zhao, Eva C. Schwarz, Lorenz Thurner, and Gertrud Schäfer, reflecting ongoing collaborative networks within their research domain.

Most of Markus Hoth's publications appear in venues related to immunology, cell biology, and biophysics. Notable frequent publication venues are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Frontiers in Oncology
  • eJHaem
  • Biophysical Journal

Some recent representative papers from Markus Hoth's work include:

  • Migration of Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes in 3D Collagen Matrices (2020, Biophysical Journal)
  • Faster cytotoxicity with age: Increased perforin and granzyme levels in cytotoxic CD8+ T cells boost cancer cell elimination (2022, Aging Cell)
  • Oxidative Stress-Induced STIM2 Cysteine Modifications Suppress Store-Operated Calcium Entry (2020, Cell Reports)
  • A calcium optimum for cytotoxic T lymphocyte and natural killer cell cytotoxicity (2021, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology)
  • Optoregulated force application to cellular receptors using molecular motors (2021, Nature Communications)

The scope of their work reflects cross-disciplinary approaches combining cellular and molecular biology techniques with immunological and biophysical methodologies. This includes research on the mechanics of immune cells, signaling pathways involving ion channels, and their implications for cancer and immune therapies.

In 2009, Markus Hoth received recognition from the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in the category of Physiology and Pharmacology/Toxicology.

Best Publications

  • DEPLETION OF INTRACELLULAR CALCIUM STORES ACTIVATES A CALCIUM CURRENT IN MAST-CELLS

    Markus Hoth;Reinhold Penner

  • Calcium release-activated calcium current in rat mast cells.

    M Hoth;R Penner

  • Overcoming Intrinsic Multidrug Resistance in Melanoma by Blocking the Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain of Slow-Cycling JARID1Bhigh Cells

    Alexander Roesch;Adina Vultur;Ivan Bogeski;Huan Wang

  • Mitochondrial Regulation of Store-operated Calcium Signaling in T Lymphocytes

    Markus Hoth;Christopher M. Fanger;Richard S. Lewis

  • T cell activation requires mitochondrial translocation to the immunological synapse

    Ariel Quintana;Christian Schwindling;Anna S. Wenning;Ute Becherer

  • A GTP-dependent step in the activation mechanism of capacitative calcium influx.

    C Fasolato;M Hoth;R Penner

  • Potent inhibition of Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channels and T-lymphocyte activation by the pyrazole derivative BTP2.

    Christof Zitt;Bettina Strauss;Eva C. Schwarz;Nicola Spaeth

  • Reversal of Mitochondrial Transhydrogenase Causes Oxidative Stress in Heart Failure

    Alexander G. Nickel;Albrecht Von Hardenberg;Mathias Hohl;Joachim R. Löffler

  • Mitochondrial control of calcium-channel gating: A mechanism for sustained signaling and transcriptional activation in T lymphocytes

    Markus Hoth;Donald C. Button;Richard S. Lewis

  • Square-Wave Voltammetry: A Review on the Recent Progress

    Valentin Mirceski;Rubin Gulaboski;Milivoj Lovric;Ivan Bogeski

  • Differential Redox Regulation of ORAI Ion Channels: A Mechanism to Tune Cellular Calcium Signaling

    Ivan Bogeski;Carsten Kummerow;Dalia Al-Ansary;Eva C. Schwarz

  • Red fluorescent genetically encoded indicator for intracellular hydrogen peroxide

    Yulia G. Ermakova;Dmitry S. Bilan;Mikhail E. Matlashov;Natalia M. Mishina

  • Characterization of T cell mutants with defects in capacitative calcium entry: genetic evidence for the physiological roles of CRAC channels.

    C M Fanger;M Hoth;G R Crabtree;R S Lewis

  • Calcium microdomains at the immunological synapse: how ORAI channels, mitochondria and calcium pumps generate local calcium signals for efficient T‐cell activation

    Ariel Quintana;Mathias Pasche;Christian Junker;Dalia Al-Ansary

  • TRP4 (CCE1) Protein Is Part of Native Calcium Release-activated Ca2+-like Channels in Adrenal Cells

    Stephan Philipp;Claudia Trost;Jan Warnat;Julia Rautmann

  • Non-specific effects of calcium entry antagonists in mast cells.

    Dorothee Franzius;Markus Hoth;Reinhold Penner

  • Calcium influx and its control by calcium release

    Reinhold Penner;Cristina Fasolato;Markus Hoth

  • Sustained activity of calcium release-activated calcium channels requires translocation of mitochondria to the plasma membrane.

    Ariel Quintana;Eva C. Schwarz;Christian Schwindling;Peter Lipp

  • Ca2+ and Mn2+ influx through receptor-mediated activation of nonspecific cation channels in mast cells.

    Cristina Fasolato;Markus Hoth;Gary Matthews;Reinhold Penner

  • The neglected CRAC proteins: Orai2, Orai3, and STIM2.

    Markus Hoth;Barbara A. Niemeyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Jens Rettig
Jens Rettig Saarland University
Frank Müller
Frank Müller Forschungszentrum Jülich
Rainer Deutzmann
Rainer Deutzmann University of Regensburg
Reinhold Penner
Reinhold Penner Queen's Medical Center
Veit Flockerzi
Veit Flockerzi Saarland University
Richard S. Lewis
Richard S. Lewis Stanford University
Martina Sester
Martina Sester Saarland University
Barbara Burwinkel
Barbara Burwinkel Heidelberg University
Eckart Meese
Eckart Meese Saarland University
Aránzazu del Campo
Aránzazu del Campo Leibniz Association

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to multiple career paths in healthcare and life sciences. If you’re interested in the administrative side of healthcare, you might consider exploring careers in coding and billing. To learn about job prospects and potential medical coder salary, it’s important to explore both the technical requirements and long-term benefits.

Before pursuing this path, it’s worthwhile to review the main challenges and advantages. Find out if is medical billing and coding worth it to decide if the field aligns with your interests and career goals.

Looking to build your qualifications online? There are many programs tailored to aspiring professionals. You can browse accredited and him degree online options with flexible learning formats. For those interested in nutrition science and public health, consider advancing your education through a master degree in nutrition online.

With the right online degree and a clear understanding of career pathways, you’ll be well equipped to make informed decisions about your future in the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Hoth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles