World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
38
Citations
7971
World Ranking
8532
National Ranking
384

Eric Gaume publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Gaume sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 117 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Eric Gaume D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Gaume sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric Gaume is affiliated with Université Gustave Eiffel in France and has a research focus primarily in Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Atmospheric Science, Transportation, and Epidemiology.

Their principal research topics cover areas such as Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Climate variability and models, and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations.

Eric Gaume has contributed to publications in multiple venues. The most frequent include:

  • Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • Journal of Flood Risk Management
  • La Houille Blanche
  • LHB
  • Water Resources Research

Among their notable recent papers are:

  • Performance of automated methods for flash flood inundation mapping: a comparison of a digital terrain model (DTM) filling and two hydrodynamic methods, 2021, Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • Tempête Alex du 2 octobre 2020 dans les Alpes-Maritimes: une contribution de la communauté scientifique à l'estimation des débits de pointe des crues, 2022, LHB
  • Extreme Sea Level Estimation Combining Systematic Observed Skew Surges and Historical Record Sea Levels, 2022, Water Resources Research
  • Technical note: Comparing three different methods for allocating river points to coarse-resolution hydrological modelling grid cells, 2024, Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • A methodological framework for the evaluation of short-range flash-flood hydrometeorological forecasts at the event scale, 2023, Natural hazards and earth system sciences

Frequent co-authors working with Eric Gaume include:

  • Olivier Payrastre
  • P Nicolle
  • Juliette Godet
  • Pierre Javelle
  • Frédéric Pons

Best Publications

  • Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective

    Günter Blöschl;Marc F.P. Bierkens;Antonio Chambel;Christophe Cudennec

  • A compilation of data on European flash floods

    Eric Gaume;Valerie Bain;Pietro Bernardara;Olivier Newinger

  • Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management

    L. Marchi;M. Borga;E. Preciso;Eric Gaume

  • The Catastrophic Flash-Flood Event of 8–9 September 2002 in the Gard Region, France: A First Case Study for the Cévennes–Vivarais Mediterranean Hydrometeorological Observatory

    G. Delrieu;John Nicol;E. Yates;P.E. Kirstetter

  • Flash flood warning based on rainfall thresholds and soil moisture conditions: An assessment for gauged and ungauged basins

    Daniele Norbiato;Marco Borga;Silvia Degli Esposti;Eric Gaume

  • Hydrological analysis of the river Aude, France, flash flood on 12 and 13 November 1999

    Eric Gaume;Marc Livet;Michel Desbordes;Jean-Pierre Villeneuve

  • Surveying flash floods: gauging the ungauged extremes

    Marco Borga;Eric Gaume;Jean Dominique Creutin;Lorenzo Marchi

  • Post‐flood field investigations in upland catchments after major flash floods: proposal of a methodology and illustrations

    Eric Gaume;M. Borga

  • Seasonal characteristics of flood regimes across the Alpine-Carpathian range.

    J. Parajka;S. Kohnova;G. Balint;M. Barbuc

  • Bayesian MCMC approach to regional flood frequency analyses involving extraordinary flood events at ungauged sites

    Eric Gaume;L. Gaal;A. Viglione;J. Szolgay

  • Uncertainties on mean areal precipitation: assessment and impact on streamflow simulations

    L. Moulin;E. Gaume;Charles Obled

  • Reducing the uncertainty in indirect estimates of extreme flash flood discharges

    Darren Lumbroso;Darren Lumbroso;Eric Gaume

  • Comprehensive post-event survey of a flash flood in Western Slovenia: observation strategy and lessons learned

    Lorenzo Marchi;Marco Borga;Emanuele Preciso;Marco Sangati

  • Usefulness of historical information for flood frequency analyses: Developments based on a case study

    Olivier Payrastre;Eric Gaume;Hervé Andrieu

  • Uncertainty assessment and analysis of the calibrated parameter values of an urban storm water quality model

    Eric Gaume;Jean-Pierre Villeneuve;Michel Desbordes

  • Storm water quality modelling, an ambitious objective?

    M. Ahyerre;G. Chebbo;B. Tassin;E. Gaume

  • Flood frequency analysis using historical data: accounting for random and systematic errors

    Luc Neppel;Benjamin Renard;Michel Lang;Pierre Alain Ayral

  • Integrated high-resolution dataset of high-intensity European and Mediterranean flash floods

    William Amponsah;William Amponsah;Pierre-Alain Ayral;Brice Boudevillain;Christophe Bouvier

  • Spatially distributed flood forecasting in flash flood prone areas: Application to road network supervision in Southern France

    Jean Philippe Naulin;Olivier Payrastre;Eric Gaume

  • Hydrological analysis of a flash flood across a climatic and geologic gradient: The September 18, 2007 event in Western Slovenia

    Francesco Zanon;Marco Borga;Davide Zoccatelli;Lorenzo Marchi

  • Distributed hydrologic and hydraulic modelling with radar rainfall input: Reconstruction of the 8–9 September 2002 catastrophic flood event in the Gard region, France

    Laurent Bonnifait;Guy Delrieu;Matthieu Le Lay;Brice Boudevillain

  • Bayesian approach for the calibration of models: application to an urban stormwater pollution model.

    A. Kanso;Marie-Christine Gromaire;E. Gaume;Bruno Tassin

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Borga
Marco Borga University of Padua
Lorenzo Marchi
Lorenzo Marchi National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Guy Delrieu
Guy Delrieu Grenoble Alpes University
Alberto Viglione
Alberto Viglione Polytechnic University of Turin
Sandrine Anquetin
Sandrine Anquetin Grenoble Alpes University
Véronique Ducrocq
Véronique Ducrocq Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Charles Perrin
Charles Perrin University of Paris-Saclay
Ghassan Chebbo
Ghassan Chebbo École des Ponts ParisTech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees that complement this field. For students seeking flexibility and affordability, pursuing a low cost online general studies degree can be an excellent starting point. These programs provide a broad educational foundation, enabling learners to tailor their studies toward environmental topics.

For those interested in specialized areas, degrees in geology and geographic information systems (GIS) offer valuable skills. An online geology degree is ideal for understanding Earth's processes, which is critical for environmental assessment and conservation efforts. Similarly, the demand for spatial data expertise is growing, making best GIS programs in the US highly relevant for mapping and analyzing environmental data.

For prospective students worried about difficulty levels, it’s worth noting that some programs are recognized as the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get. Choosing a program that aligns with your strengths can enhance your academic success while still offering career opportunities in environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Gaume

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles