World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 52 4197 3858 44 41 206 10412

Maurício Lacerda Nogueira publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maurício Lacerda Nogueira between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maurício Lacerda Nogueira published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2024. 67 of the 359 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2024. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 40 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 41 publications 2025: 26 publications
1992 2025

359 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maurício Lacerda Nogueira: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 1
2004 3
2005 2
2006 0
2007 8
2008 4
2009 5
2010 4
2011 12
2012 8
2013 10
2014 8
2015 16
2016 13
2017 25
2018 22
2019 18
2020 28
2021 29
2022 40
2023 28
2024 41
2025 26
Total 359
Download as CSV

Maurício Lacerda Nogueira publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurício Lacerda Nogueira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 205–214 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 206 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208 206
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Maurício Lacerda Nogueira D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurício Lacerda Nogueira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116 52
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Maurício Lacerda Nogueira is affiliated with the Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto in Brazil. Their research is primarily situated in the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Insect Science, and Modeling and Simulation.

The scientist's work encompasses multiple key topics, including:

  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Viral Infections and Vectors
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Malaria Research and Control
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences

Recent publications by Maurício Lacerda Nogueira reflect their involvement in important studies related to COVID-19 and infectious diseases. Notable papers include:

  • "Effect of High vs Low Doses of Chloroquine Diphosphate as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection," 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • "Evolution and epidemic spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil," 2020, Science
  • "Methylprednisolone as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19; Metcovid): A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase IIb, Placebo-controlled Trial," 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • "Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil," 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Efficacy and Safety of a COVID-19 Inactivated Vaccine in Healthcare Professionals in Brazil: The PROFISCOV Study," 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Cássia Fernanda Estofolete
  • Lívia Sacchetto
  • Nikos Vasilakis
  • Cecília Ártico Banho
  • Paula Rahal

Publication venues where Maurício Lacerda Nogueira has contributed regularly are:

  • Viruses
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

In addition to scientific articles, Maurício Lacerda Nogueira has contributed to book publishing, including the work titled ENSINO DE CIÊNCIAS E HUMANIDADES: CONECTANDO VOZES, LUGARES DE FALA E EXPERIÊNCIAS INCLUSIVAS, published by Editora Schreiben eBooks in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Field-deployable viral diagnostics using CRISPR-Cas13

    Cameron Myhrvold;Cameron Myhrvold;Catherine A. Freije;Catherine A. Freije;Jonathan S. Gootenberg;Omar O. Abudayyeh

  • Evolution and epidemic spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil.

    Darlan S. Candido;Darlan S. Candido;Ingra M. Claro;Jaqueline G. de Jesus;William M. Souza

  • Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil.

    William Marciel de Souza;Lewis Fletcher Buss;Darlan da Silva Candido;Darlan da Silva Candido;Jean Paul Carrera

  • Methylprednisolone as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19; Metcovid): A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase IIb, Placebo-controlled Trial.

    Christiane Maria Prado Jeronimo;Maria Eduarda Leão Farias;Fernando Fonseca Almeida Val;Vanderson Souza Sampaio

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Electrical Detection of Dengue Biomarker Using Egg Yolk Immunoglobulin as the Biological Recognition Element

    Alessandra Figueiredo;Nirton C. S. Vieira;Juliana F. dos Santos;Bruno C. Janegitz

  • Impact of preexisting dengue immunity on Zika virus emergence in a dengue endemic region

    Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer;Federico Costa;Federico Costa;Federico Costa;Eduardo J. M. Nascimento;Nivison Nery Júnior;Nivison Nery Júnior

  • The green tea molecule EGCG inhibits Zika virus entry

    Bruno M. Carneiro;Mariana N. Batista;Ana Cláudia S. Braga;Maurício L. Nogueira

  • Efficacy and Safety of a COVID-19 Inactivated Vaccine in Healthcare Professionals in Brazil: The PROFISCOV Study

    Palacios R;Batista Ap;Albuquerque Csn;Patiño Eg

  • Rapid antigen tests for dengue virus serotypes and Zika virus in patient serum

    Irene Bosch;Irene Bosch;Helena de Puig;Megan Hiley;Marc Carré-Camps

  • Araçatuba virus: a vaccinialike virus associated with infection in humans and cattle.

    Giliane de Souza Trindade;Flávio Guimarães da Fonseca;João Trindade Marques;Maurício Lacerda Nogueira

  • Saint Louis encephalitis virus, Brazil

    Adriano Mondini;Izabela Lídia Soares Cardeal;Eduardo Lázaro;Silva H. Nunes

  • Zika Virus Infects, Activates, and Crosses Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells, without Barrier Disruption.

    Michelle P. Papa;Lana M. Meuren;Sharton V. A. Coelho;Carolina G. de Oliveira Lucas

  • Detection of P. aeruginosa harboring bla CTX-M-2 , bla GES-1 and bla GES-5, bla IMP-1 and bla SPM-1 causing infections in Brazilian tertiary-care hospital

    Milena Polotto;Milena Polotto;Tiago Casella;Tiago Casella;Maria Gabriela de Lucca Oliveira;Fernando G. Rubio

  • Lethal encephalitis in myeloid differentiation factor 88-deficient mice infected with herpes simplex virus 1.

    Daniel S. Mansur;Erna G. Kroon;Maurício L. Nogueira;Rosa M.E. Arantes

  • Viral Load and Cytokine Response Profile Does Not Support Antibody-Dependent Enhancement in Dengue-Primed Zika Virus-Infected Patients.

    Ana Carolina Bernardes Terzian;Alessandra Soares Schanoski;Mânlio Tasso de Oliveira Mota;Rafael Alves da Silva

  • Zika Virus Infection and Solid Organ Transplantation: A New Challenge

    M. L. Nogueira;C. F. Estofolete;A. C B Terzian;E. P B Mascarin do Vale

  • Evidence of natural Zika virus infection in neotropical non-human primates in Brazil

    Ana Carolina B. Terzian;Nathalia Zini;Lívia Sacchetto;Rebeca Froes Rocha

  • Circulation of different lineages of Dengue virus 2, genotype American/Asian in Brazil: dynamics and molecular and phylogenetic characterization.

    Betânia Paiva Drumond;Adriano Mondini;Diane J. Schmidt;Roberta Vieira de Morais Bronzoni

  • Spatio-temporal tracking and phylodynamics of an urban dengue 3 outbreak in São Paulo, Brazil.

    Adriano Mondini;Roberta Vieira de Moraes Bronzoni;Silvia Helena Pereira Nunes;Francisco Chiaravalloti Neto

  • Re-Emergence of Yellow Fever in Brazil during 2016-2019: Challenges, Lessons Learned, and Perspectives.

    Poliana de Oliveira Figueiredo;Ana Gabriella Stoffella-Dutra;Galileu Barbosa Costa;Jaqueline Silva de Oliveira

  • Mayaro virus: a neglected arbovirus of the Americas

    Mânlio Tasso de Oliveira Mota;Milene Rocha Ribeiro;Danila Vedovello;Maurício Lacerda Nogueira

  • Evolution and epidemic spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil

    Darlan S. Candido;Ingra M. Claro;Jaqueline G. de Jesus;William M. Souza

Frequent Co-Authors

Erna Geessien Kroon
Erna Geessien Kroon Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Nikos Vasilakis
Nikos Vasilakis The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Nuno Rodrigues Faria
Nuno Rodrigues Faria Imperial College London
Mauro M. Teixeira
Mauro M. Teixeira Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Ester C. Sabino
Ester C. Sabino Universidade de São Paulo
Luiz Tadeu Moraes Figueiredo
Luiz Tadeu Moraes Figueiredo Universidade de São Paulo
Lee Gehrke
Lee Gehrke Harvard University
Marta Giovanetti
Marta Giovanetti University of Rome Tor Vergata
Edison Luiz Durigon
Edison Luiz Durigon Universidade de São Paulo
Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara
Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara Oswaldo Cruz Foundation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in microbiology, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students consider medical degrees online that pay well to combine their science background with high-demand healthcare roles. These programs often offer flexibility for working professionals looking to advance their qualifications.

If you prefer public health, pursuing one of the fastest and easiest online MPH programs to get into can be a practical choice. These programs emphasize disease prevention and community health, complementing microbiology expertise and broadening career prospects.

For those drawn to pediatric healthcare, becoming a child life specialist offers a unique path. This career focuses on supporting children and families during challenging medical experiences and benefits from knowledge in biological sciences.

Lastly, individuals with diverse backgrounds, including those facing challenges such as a criminal record, can find guidance on pursuing higher education through resources like what is the best degree for a convicted felon. This encourages inclusive pathways into microbiology-related fields and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Maurício Lacerda Nogueira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles