World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
18871
World Ranking
19436
National Ranking
9682

Ellen T. Chang publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen T. Chang sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 272 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ellen T. Chang D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen T. Chang sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Cancer
  • Internal medicine
  • Disease

Ellen T. Chang mainly focuses on Internal medicine, Epidemiology, Cancer, Odds ratio and Immunology. Ellen T. Chang has included themes like Endocrinology, Surgery and Oncology in her Internal medicine study. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mortality rate and Incidence.

Her Cancer study combines topics in areas such as Relative risk and Toxicology. Her Odds ratio research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Lower risk, Quartile, Confidence interval and Case-control study. Her work in Immunology covers topics such as Risk factor which are related to areas like Lymphoma, Family history and Etiology.

Her most cited work include:

  • The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. (873 citations)
  • Lung Cancer Incidence in Never Smokers (364 citations)
  • A novel 160-kDa phosphotyrosine protein in insulin-treated embryonic kidney cells is a new member of the insulin receptor substrate family. (334 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Internal medicine, Epidemiology, Immunology, Odds ratio and Oncology are her primary areas of study. Lymphoma, Cancer, Young adult, Prospective cohort study and Cohort are among the areas of Internal medicine where the researcher is concentrating her efforts. Her studies in Epidemiology integrate themes in fields like Body mass index, Incidence, Environmental exposure, Public health and Etiology.

As part of her studies on Immunology, she frequently links adjacent subjects like Family history. Her Odds ratio research includes themes of Case-control study, Confidence interval, Aspirin, Confounding and Risk factor. Her Oncology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Vitamin D and neurology, Epidemiology of cancer and Proportional hazards model.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Internal medicine (67.24%)
  • Epidemiology (39.31%)
  • Immunology (38.28%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (15.52%)
  • Internal medicine (67.24%)
  • Case-control study (32.07%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ellen T. Chang focuses on Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Internal medicine, Case-control study, Odds ratio and Epidemiology. Her work deals with themes such as Gastroenterology and Oncology, which intersect with Internal medicine. In general Oncology, her work in Lung cancer is often linked to Diesel exhaust linking many areas of study.

Her studies deal with areas such as Young adult, Morinda officinalis, Logistic regression and Medical history as well as Case-control study. She interconnects Confidence interval, Codonopsis pilosula, Smilax glabra, Aspirin and Traditional medicine in the investigation of issues within Odds ratio. Her Epidemiology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Mesothelioma, Environmental health, Race ethnicity, Public health and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Between 2015 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Are We Winning or Losing the Battle With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Trends in Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Mortality Risk for the Medicare Population. (92 citations)
  • Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies discovers multiple loci for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (69 citations)
  • Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies discovers multiple loci for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (69 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Cancer
  • Internal medicine
  • Disease

Ellen T. Chang mostly deals with Internal medicine, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Hazard ratio, Odds ratio and Nasopharyngeal neoplasm. Her work in Internal medicine is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Hepatitis B virus. While the research belongs to areas of Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Ellen T. Chang spends her time largely on the problem of Case-control study, intersecting her research to questions surrounding Virology, Epstein–Barr virus and Virus.

Her Hazard ratio study deals with Proportional hazards model intersecting with Confounding Factors, Relative risk and Risk factor. Her studies deal with areas such as Absolute risk reduction, Confidence interval, Incidence, Cohort study and Family history as well as Odds ratio. Her work is dedicated to discovering how Nasopharyngeal neoplasm, Oncology are connected with Prospective cohort study and other disciplines.

Best Publications

  • The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

    Ellen T. Chang;Hans-Olov Adami

  • Lung Cancer Incidence in Never Smokers

    Heather A. Wakelee;Ellen T. Chang;Scarlett L. Gomez;Theresa H. M. Keegan

  • Autoimmune and Chronic Inflammatory Disorders and Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma by Subtype

    Karin Ekström Smedby;Henrik Hjalgrim;Johan Askling;Ellen T. Chang

  • A novel 160-kDa phosphotyrosine protein in insulin-treated embryonic kidney cells is a new member of the insulin receptor substrate family.

    Brian E. Lavan;Valeria R. Fantin;Ellen T. Chang;William S. Lane

  • Are We Winning or Losing the Battle With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Trends in Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Mortality Risk for the Medicare Population.

    Steven M. Kurtz;Edmund C. Lau;Min-Sun Son;Ellen T. Chang

  • The non‐Hodgkin lymphomas: A review of the epidemiologic literature

    Dominik D. Alexander;Pamela J. Mink;Hans-Olov Adami;Hans-Olov Adami;Ellen T. Chang

  • Long-Term Exposure to Air Pollution and Cardiorespiratory Disease in the California Teachers Study Cohort

    Michael J. Lipsett;Bart D. Ostro;Peggy Reynolds;Debbie Goldberg

  • Etiologic Heterogeneity Among Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes: The InterLymph Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes Project

    Lindsay M. Morton;Susan L. Slager;James R. Cerhan;Sophia S. Wang

  • Sodium-to-Potassium Ratio and Blood Pressure, Hypertension, and Related Factors

    Vanessa Perez;Ellen T. Chang

  • Enigmatic sex disparities in cancer incidence

    Gustaf Edgren;Gustaf Edgren;Liming Liang;Hans-Olov Adami;Hans-Olov Adami;Ellen T. Chang;Ellen T. Chang

  • Immunological Quantitation and Localization of ACAT-1 and ACAT-2 in Human Liver and Small Intestine

    Catherine C.Y. Chang;Naomi Sakashita;Kim Ornvold;Oneil Lee

  • Why we should routinely screen Asian American adults for hepatitis B: A cross‐sectional study of Asians in California

    Steven Y. Lin;Ellen T. Chang;Samuel K. So

  • Genome-wide association study identifies multiple risk loci for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

    Sonja I. Berndt;Christine F. Skibola;Christine F. Skibola;Vijai Joseph;Nicola J. Camp

  • A genome-wide association study of Hodgkin's lymphoma identifies new susceptibility loci at 2p16.1 ( REL ), 8q24.21 and 10p14 ( GATA3 )

    Victor Enciso-Mora;Peter Broderick;Yussanne Ma;Ruth F. Jarrett

  • Infectious mononucleosis, childhood social environment, and risk of Hodgkin lymphoma.

    Henrik Hjalgrim;Karin Ekström Smedby;Klaus Rostgaard;Daniel Molin

  • Family History of Hematopoietic Malignancy and Risk of Lymphoma

    Ellen T. Chang;Karin Ekström Smedby;Henrik Hjalgrim;Anna Porwit-MacDonald

  • Dietary Phytoestrogen, Serum Enterolactone and Risk of Prostate Cancer: The Cancer Prostate Sweden Study (Sweden)

    Maria Hedelin;Åsa Klint;Ellen T. Chang;Rino Bellocco

  • Association between Parkinson’s Disease and Cigarette Smoking, Rural Living, Well-Water Consumption, Farming and Pesticide Use: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Charles B. Breckenridge;Colin Berry;Ellen T. Chang;Robert L. Sielken

  • The Evolving Epidemiology of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

    Ellen T. Chang;Weimin Ye;Yi-Xin Zeng;Hans-Olov Adami;Hans-Olov Adami

  • Asian ethnicity and breast cancer subtypes: a study from the California Cancer Registry

    Melinda L. Telli;Ellen T. Chang;Ellen T. Chang;Allison W. Kurian;Theresa H. M. Keegan;Theresa H. M. Keegan

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Olov Adami
Hans-Olov Adami Karolinska Institute
Christina A. Clarke
Christina A. Clarke Grail (United States)
Theresa H.M. Keegan
Theresa H.M. Keegan University of California, Davis
Bengt Glimelius
Bengt Glimelius Uppsala University
Karin E. Smedby
Karin E. Smedby Karolinska University Hospital
Mads Melbye
Mads Melbye University of Copenhagen
Henrik Hjalgrim
Henrik Hjalgrim Statens Serum Institut
Weimin Ye
Weimin Ye Karolinska Institute
Pamela L. Horn-Ross
Pamela L. Horn-Ross Cancer Prevention Institute of California
Sophia S. Wang
Sophia S. Wang City Of Hope National Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online options is an increasingly popular route for those interested in healthcare careers. Many students begin by pursuing nursing credentials. If you’re already a registered nurse, pursuing an rn to bsn online cost program provides a flexible, affordable way to earn a bachelor's degree and improve your job prospects.

For those without a nursing background, there are online msn programs for non nurses that offer advanced education and new career opportunities—often with accelerated timelines.

If you’re concerned about prerequisites, you may want to start with the easiest nursing programs to get into. These schools typically have more flexible admissions requirements, enabling more students to begin their nursing journey.

Healthcare career paths aren’t limited to direct patient care. Those interested in the administrative side can pursue medical billing and coding. Fortunately, there are financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes options, making this pathway even more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Ellen T. Chang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles