World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 57 1714 823 94 24970

Elizabeth Fennema publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth Fennema between 1959 and 2013, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth Fennema published across 55 years, from 1959 to 2013, averaging 1.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2012. 9 of the 99 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2013. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2012. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 1 publication
1959 2013

99 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth Fennema: publications per year, 1959 to 2013
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 2
1973 1
1974 2
1975 0
1976 3
1977 4
1978 3
1979 1
1980 3
1981 5
1982 0
1983 2
1984 2
1985 4
1986 1
1987 0
1988 4
1989 4
1990 4
1991 2
1992 4
1993 3
1994 3
1995 2
1996 6
1997 5
1998 6
1999 5
2000 2
2001 2
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 8
2013 1
Total 99
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Fennema publications per year - data summary

  • Elizabeth Fennema, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, has 99 publications recorded across 55 years, from 1959 to 2013.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1959 and the most recent to 2013.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 8 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1959, 1969, 1973, 1979 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 21 of the 55 years in the span carry no publications at all (1960, 1961, 1962, 1963 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 1.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.9 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2009-2013) hold 9 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1959-1977: 14 publications (0.7 per year); 1978-1996: 53 publications (2.8 per year); 1997-2013: 32 publications (1.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Elizabeth Fennema publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Fennema sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 94 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 94
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Fennema publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Elizabeth Fennema, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, records 94 publications - the 11th percentile of the discipline.
  • 11% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Elizabeth Fennema, and about 89% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Elizabeth Fennema ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Elizabeth Fennema D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Fennema sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129 57
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Fennema D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Elizabeth Fennema, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, records 57 D-Index - the 78th percentile of the discipline.
  • 78% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Elizabeth Fennema, and about 22% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Elizabeth Fennema ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Elizabeth Fennema is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. The academic profile focuses on their association with this institution.

There are no records of recent papers or publications linked to Elizabeth Fennema. Similarly, no frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications have been documented in the data provided.

Information on main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of research work is not available. There is also no evidence of awards won or recognitions received.

Due to the limited availability of detailed information on research output and academic contributions, further specifics about Elizabeth Fennema's scientific work and career remain unreported in this dataset.

Best Publications

  • Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Elizabeth Fennema;Susan J. Lamon

  • A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF LEARNING TO USE CHILDREN'S THINKING IN MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION

    Elizabeth Fennema;Thomas P. Carpenter;Megan L. Franke;Linda Levi

  • Using Knowledge of Children’s Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Penelope L. Peterson;Chi-Pang Chiang

  • Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors

    Elizabeth Fennema;Julia Sherman

  • Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales: Instruments Designed to Measure Attitudes Toward the Learning of Mathematics by Females and Males.

    Elizabeth Fennema;Julia A. Sherman

  • Teachers' knowledge and its impact.

    Elizabeth Fennema;Megan Loef Franke

  • Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics

    James Hiebert;Thomas P Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Karen Fuson

  • Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect: A Meta-Analysis

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Elizabeth Fennema;Marilyn Ryan;Laurie A. Frost

  • Children's Mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Megan Loef Franke;Linda Levi

  • Cognitively Guided Instruction: A Knowledge Base for Reform in Primary Mathematics Instruction

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Megan L. Franke

  • Capturing Teachers’ Generative Change: A Follow-Up Study of Professional Development in Mathematics

    Megan Loef Franke;Thomas P. Carpenter;Linda Levi;Elizabeth Fennema

  • Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement and Related Factors: A Further Study.

    Elizabeth H. Fennema;Julia A. Sherman

  • Teachers' Pedagogical Content Beliefs in Mathematics

    Penelope L. Peterson;Elizabeth Fennema;Thomas P. Carpenter;Megan Loef

  • A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Megan L. Franke;Victoria R. Jacobs;Victoria R. Jacobs;Elizabeth Fennema

  • Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of students' problem solving in elementary arithmetic

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Penelope L. Peterson;Deborah A. Carey

  • New directions for equity in mathematics education

    Walter G. Secada;Elizabeth Fennema;Lisa Byrd Adajian

  • Children's Conceptual Structures for Multidigit Numbers and Methods of Multidigit Addition and Subtraction.

    Karen C. Fuson;Diana Wearne;James C. Hiebert;Hanlie G. Murray

  • Teachers' attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics

    Elizabeth Fennema;Penelope L. Peterson;Thomas P. Carpenter;Cheryl A. Lubinski

  • Mathematics and Gender

    Elizabeth Fennema;Gilah C. Leder

  • Teaching and Learning Mathematics With Understanding

    Elizabeth Fennema;Thomas A. Romberg

  • Effective Teaching, Student Engagement in Classroom Activities, and Sex-Related Differences in Learning Mathematics

    Penelope L Peterson;Elizabeth Fennema

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas P. Carpenter
Thomas P. Carpenter University of Wisconsin–Madison
Penelope L. Peterson
Penelope L. Peterson Northwestern University
James Hiebert
James Hiebert University of Delaware
Janet Shibley Hyde
Janet Shibley Hyde University of Wisconsin–Madison
Nel Noddings
Nel Noddings Stanford University
Gabriele Kaiser
Gabriele Kaiser Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Social Sciences and Humanities opens a wide range of career opportunities, and earning your degree online has never been more accessible. Many students are now turning to flexible, affordable options like the cheapest online psychology degree programs to begin their careers in mental health or counseling.

For those interested in working with communities, a masters in social work can be a practical choice, especially with online programs that are easier to get into and offer a broad scope for advocacy roles and social services.

If your goal is to move into advanced clinical practice, you may consider a part time psyd program for a doctoral path in psychology. These online doctoral programs often offer schedule flexibility while maintaining high academic standards.

Those interested in family dynamics and therapy can pursue focused training through marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by leading professional bodies. With shorter completion times and full accreditation, these programs offer a fast track to professional licensure and practice.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Fennema