World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
57
Citations
24970
World Ranking
1714
National Ranking
823

Elizabeth Fennema publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Fennema sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 94 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Elizabeth Fennema D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Fennema sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth Fennema is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. The academic profile focuses on their association with this institution.

There are no records of recent papers or publications linked to Elizabeth Fennema. Similarly, no frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications have been documented in the data provided.

Information on main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of research work is not available. There is also no evidence of awards won or recognitions received.

Due to the limited availability of detailed information on research output and academic contributions, further specifics about Elizabeth Fennema's scientific work and career remain unreported in this dataset.

Best Publications

  • Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Elizabeth Fennema;Susan J. Lamon

  • A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF LEARNING TO USE CHILDREN'S THINKING IN MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION

    Elizabeth Fennema;Thomas P. Carpenter;Megan L. Franke;Linda Levi

  • Using Knowledge of Children’s Mathematics Thinking in Classroom Teaching: An Experimental Study

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Penelope L. Peterson;Chi-Pang Chiang

  • Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization and Affective Factors

    Elizabeth Fennema;Julia Sherman

  • Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales: Instruments Designed to Measure Attitudes Toward the Learning of Mathematics by Females and Males.

    Elizabeth Fennema;Julia A. Sherman

  • Teachers' knowledge and its impact.

    Elizabeth Fennema;Megan Loef Franke

  • Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics

    James Hiebert;Thomas P Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Karen Fuson

  • Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect: A Meta-Analysis

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Elizabeth Fennema;Marilyn Ryan;Laurie A. Frost

  • Children's Mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Megan Loef Franke;Linda Levi

  • Cognitively Guided Instruction: A Knowledge Base for Reform in Primary Mathematics Instruction

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Megan L. Franke

  • Capturing Teachers’ Generative Change: A Follow-Up Study of Professional Development in Mathematics

    Megan Loef Franke;Thomas P. Carpenter;Linda Levi;Elizabeth Fennema

  • Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement and Related Factors: A Further Study.

    Elizabeth H. Fennema;Julia A. Sherman

  • Teachers' Pedagogical Content Beliefs in Mathematics

    Penelope L. Peterson;Elizabeth Fennema;Thomas P. Carpenter;Megan Loef

  • A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Megan L. Franke;Victoria R. Jacobs;Victoria R. Jacobs;Elizabeth Fennema

  • Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of students' problem solving in elementary arithmetic

    Thomas P. Carpenter;Elizabeth Fennema;Penelope L. Peterson;Deborah A. Carey

  • New directions for equity in mathematics education

    Walter G. Secada;Elizabeth Fennema;Lisa Byrd Adajian

  • Children's Conceptual Structures for Multidigit Numbers and Methods of Multidigit Addition and Subtraction.

    Karen C. Fuson;Diana Wearne;James C. Hiebert;Hanlie G. Murray

  • Teachers' attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics

    Elizabeth Fennema;Penelope L. Peterson;Thomas P. Carpenter;Cheryl A. Lubinski

  • Mathematics and Gender

    Elizabeth Fennema;Gilah C. Leder

  • Teaching and Learning Mathematics With Understanding

    Elizabeth Fennema;Thomas A. Romberg

  • Effective Teaching, Student Engagement in Classroom Activities, and Sex-Related Differences in Learning Mathematics

    Penelope L Peterson;Elizabeth Fennema

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas P. Carpenter
Thomas P. Carpenter University of Wisconsin–Madison
Penelope L. Peterson
Penelope L. Peterson Northwestern University
James Hiebert
James Hiebert University of Delaware
Janet Shibley Hyde
Janet Shibley Hyde University of Wisconsin–Madison
Nel Noddings
Nel Noddings Stanford University
Gabriele Kaiser
Gabriele Kaiser Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Social Sciences and Humanities opens a wide range of career opportunities, and earning your degree online has never been more accessible. Many students are now turning to flexible, affordable options like the cheapest online psychology degree programs to begin their careers in mental health or counseling.

For those interested in working with communities, a masters in social work can be a practical choice, especially with online programs that are easier to get into and offer a broad scope for advocacy roles and social services.

If your goal is to move into advanced clinical practice, you may consider a part time psyd program for a doctoral path in psychology. These online doctoral programs often offer schedule flexibility while maintaining high academic standards.

Those interested in family dynamics and therapy can pursue focused training through marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by leading professional bodies. With shorter completion times and full accreditation, these programs offer a fast track to professional licensure and practice.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Fennema

Recently Published Articles