World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 42 17414 4267 79 8150
Molecular Biology 44 2919 1390 74 8392

Eldon E. Baird publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eldon E. Baird between 1993 and 2009, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eldon E. Baird published across 17 years, from 1993 to 2009, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 1998. 1 of the 88 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2009. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 1998. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 14 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 19 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication
1993 2009

88 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eldon E. Baird: publications per year, 1993 to 2009
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 14
1997 7
1998 19
1999 13
2000 8
2001 4
2002 11
2003 6
2004 3
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
Total 88
Download as CSV

Eldon E. Baird publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eldon E. Baird sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 67–76 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 74 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65 74
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Eldon E. Baird D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eldon E. Baird sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115 44
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Eldon E. Baird is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their academic profile highlights a career rooted in research, though specific details about their research papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not documented in the provided source data.

The absence of recorded main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work suggests that these aspects of Eldon E. Baird's research have not been cataloged in the available data. Similarly, there is no information regarding recent publications, which indicates that any current research outputs are either unpublished or not registered in the referenced databases.

There are no reported book publications attributed to Eldon E. Baird, and no awards or honors have been recorded. This lack of detailed publication and award information limits the insight into the specific scientific contributions or recognition they may have received.

The scientist is currently living, and their professional activity is linked to a major research institution known for its scientific and technological contributions. This affiliation suggests access to substantial academic resources and collaborative opportunities, though specific collaborations are not listed.

Best Publications

  • Recognition of the four Watson–Crick base pairs in the DNA minor groove by synthetic ligands

    Sarah White;Jason W. Szewczyk;James M. Turner;Eldon E. Baird

  • Regulation of gene expression by small molecules

    Joel M. Gottesfeld;Laura Neely;John W. Trauger;Eldon E. Baird

  • Recognition of DNA by designed ligands at subnanomolar concentrations

    John W. Trauger;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • Solid Phase Synthesis of Polyamides Containing Imidazole and Pyrrole Amino Acids

    Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • A Structural Basis for Recognition of A·T and T·A Base Pairs in the Minor Groove of B-DNA

    Clara L. Kielkopf;Sarah White;Jason W. Szewczyk;James M. Turner

  • Inhibition of RNA polymerase II transcription in human cells by synthetic DNA-binding ligands.

    Liliane A. Dickinson;Richard J. Gulizia;John W. Trauger;Eldon E. Baird

  • Structural basis for G.C recognition in the DNA minor groove.

    Clara L. Kielkopf;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan;Douglas C. Rees;Douglas C. Rees

  • On the pairing rules for recognition in the minor groove of DNA by pyrrole-imidazole polyamides

    Sarah White;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • Fmoc solid phase synthesis of polyamides containing pyrrole and imidazole amino acids.

    Nicholas R. Wurtz;James M. Turner;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • Aliphatic/aromatic amino acid pairings for polyamide recognition in the minor groove of DNA

    James M. Turner;Susanne E. Swalley;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • Stereochemical control of the dna binding affinity, sequence specificity, and orientation-preference of chiral hairpin polyamides in the minor groove

    Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • Methods of treating infection by drug resistant bacteria

    Heinz E. Moser;Eldon E. Baird;Roland W. Burli;Yigong Ge

  • Extension of sequence-specific recognition in the minor groove of DNA by pyrrole-imidazole polyamides to 9-13 base pairs

    John W. Trauger;Eldon E. Baird;Milan Mrksich;Peter B. Dervan

  • OPTIMIZATION OF THE HAIRPIN POLYAMIDE DESIGN FOR RECOGNITION OF THE MINOR GROOVE OF DNA

    Michelle E. Parks;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • DISCRIMINATION OF 5'-GGGG-3', 5'-GCGC-3', AND 5'-GGCC-3' SEQUENCES IN THE MINOR GROOVE OF DNA BY EIGHT-RING HAIRPIN POLYAMIDES

    Susanne E. Swalley;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • Binding of a hairpin polyamide in the minor groove of DNA: Sequence-specific enthalpic discrimination

    Daniel S. Pilch;Natasa Poklar;Craig A. Gelfand;Scott M. Law

  • RECOGNITION OF 16 BASE PAIRS IN THE MINOR GROOVE OF DNA BY A PYRROLE-IMIDAZOLE POLYAMIDE DIMER

    John W. Trauger;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • Recognition of seven base pair sequences in the minor groove of DNA by ten-ring pyrrole-imidazole polyamide hairpins

    James M. Turner;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

  • Structural effects of DNA sequence on T·A recognition by hydroxypyrrole/pyrrole pairs in the minor groove

    Clara L Kielkopf;Ryan E Bremer;Sarah White;Jason W Szewczyk

  • Effects of the A·T/T·A Degeneracy of Pyrrole−Imidazole Polyamide Recognition in the Minor Groove of DNA†

    Sarah White;Eldon E. Baird;Peter B. Dervan

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter B. Dervan
Peter B. Dervan California Institute of Technology
Joel M. Gottesfeld
Joel M. Gottesfeld Scripps Research Institute
Wenhao Hu
Wenhao Hu Sun Yat-sen University
Douglas C. Rees
Douglas C. Rees California Institute of Technology
Kenneth J. Breslauer
Kenneth J. Breslauer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
David E. Wemmer
David E. Wemmer University of California, Berkeley
Daniel S. Pilch
Daniel S. Pilch Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Christian Melander
Christian Melander University of Notre Dame
Milan Mrksich
Milan Mrksich Northwestern University
Barbara J. Graves
Barbara J. Graves University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in Molecular Biology also explore related fields, such as psychology and counseling, to expand their scientific and career options. Advancements in online education make it easier than ever to earn relevant degrees from anywhere in the USA.

For example, some molecular biology graduates pursue careers in forensic sciences. Understanding how much do forensic psychologists make can help you evaluate potential salary outcomes in related interdisciplinary fields.

If you’re drawn to working with children or adolescents, consider programs like the masters in child psychology, which combines research, counseling, and developmental science. Affordability is a key concern for many, and those seeking budget-friendly options may want to research the cheapest masters in counseling online.

Clinical pathways are also popular. Programs such as the online master in clinical psychology offer flexible routes to becoming a licensed practitioner. By exploring these degrees, you can align your academic background in molecular biology with impactful career choices across healthcare and research.

Best Scientists Citing Eldon E. Baird

Recently Published Articles