World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
26944
World Ranking
17905
National Ranking
8932

Elad Ziv publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elad Ziv sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 409 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Elad Ziv D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elad Ziv sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elad Ziv is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these main fields, notable subfields of focus include Genetics, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cancer Research, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work covers several core topics related to cancer and genetics. Important topics include BRCA gene mutations in cancer, Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease.

Frequent publication venues for Elad Ziv include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cancer Research, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, UNC Libraries, and Nature Communications.

Elad Ziv has collaborated extensively with several coauthors. Frequent collaborators include Scott Huntsman, Donglei Hu, Linda Kachuri, Susan L. Neuhausen, and Laura Fejerman.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Elad Ziv include:

  • Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States, 2020, British Journal of Cancer
  • Race and Genetic Ancestry in Medicine - A Time for Reckoning with Racism, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Comprehensive Analysis of Genetic Ancestry and Its Molecular Correlates in Cancer, 2020, Cancer Cell
  • Pan-cancer study detects genetic risk variants and shared genetic basis in two large cohorts, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction, 2020, Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • The Immune Landscape of Cancer

    Vésteinn Thorsson;David L Gibbs;Scott D Brown;Denise Wolf

  • Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci

    Kyriaki Michailidou;Kyriaki Michailidou;Sara Lindström;Sara Lindström;Joe Dennis;Jonathan Beesley

  • The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice.

    Esteban González Burchard;Elad Ziv;Natasha Coyle;Scarlett Lin Gomez

  • Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease

    Neil Risch;Neil Risch;Esteban Burchard;Elad Ziv;Hua Tang

  • Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States

    Valentina A Zavala;Paige M Bracci;John M Carethers;Luis Carvajal-Carmona

  • Race and Genetic Ancestry in Medicine - A Time for Reckoning with Racism.

    Luisa N. Borrell;Jennifer R. Elhawary;Elena Fuentes-Afflick;Jonathan Witonsky

  • Latino populations: a unique opportunity for the study of race, genetics, and social environment in epidemiological research.

    Esteban González Burchard;Luisa N. Borrell;Shweta Choudhry;Mariam Naqvi

  • Reduced Neutrophil Count in People of African Descent Is Due To a Regulatory Variant in the Duffy Antigen Receptor for Chemokines Gene

    David Reich;David Reich;Michael A. Nalls;W. H. Linda Kao;Ermeg L. Akylbekova

  • Association of common genetic variation in the insulin/IGF1 signaling pathway with human longevity.

    Ludmila Pawlikowska;Donglei Hu;Scott Huntsman;Andrew Sung

  • Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer.

    Roger L Milne;Roger L Milne;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Kyriaki Michailidou;Kyriaki Michailidou;Jonathan Beesley

  • PCA-correlated SNPs for structure identification in worldwide human populations.

    Peristera Paschou;Elad Ziv;Esteban G Burchard;Shweta Choudhry

  • Prevention of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Approaches to Estimating and Reducing Risk

    Steven R. Cummings;Jeffrey A. Tice;Scott Bauer;Scott Bauer;Warren S. Browner

  • Mammographic Breast Density and the Gail Model for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in a Screening Population

    Jeffrey A. Tice;Steven R. Cummings;Elad Ziv;Karla Kerlikowske

  • Genetic ancestry in lung-function predictions.

    Rajesh Kumar;Max A. Seibold;Melinda C. Aldrich;L. Keoki Williams

  • Development of a Panel of Genome-Wide Ancestry Informative Markers to Study Admixture Throughout the Americas

    Joshua Mark Galanter;Juan Carlos Fernandez-Lopez;Christopher R. Gignoux;Jill Barnholtz-Sloan

  • Pharmacogenetic differences in response to albuterol between Puerto Ricans and Mexicans with asthma.

    Shweta Choudhry;Ngim Ung;Pedro C. Avila;Elad Ziv

  • Population stratification confounds genetic association studies among Latinos

    Shweta Choudhry;Shweta Choudhry;Natasha E. Coyle;Natasha E. Coyle;Hua Tang;Keyan Salari;Keyan Salari

  • The WISDOM Study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate

    Laura J Esserman;Wisdom Study;Athena Investigators

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis points to CTC1 and ZNF676 as genes regulating telomere homeostasis in humans

    Massimo Mangino;Shih Jen Hwang;Timothy D. Spector;Steven C. Hunt

  • Admixture Mapping of White Cell Count: Genetic Locus Responsible for Lower White Blood Cell Count in the Health ABC and Jackson Heart Studies

    Michael A. Nalls;James G. Wilson;Nick J. Patterson;Arti Tandon

Frequent Co-Authors

Esteban G. Burchard
Esteban G. Burchard University of California, San Francisco
Esther M. John
Esther M. John Stanford University
Christopher A. Haiman
Christopher A. Haiman University of Southern California
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
John S. Witte
John S. Witte Stanford University
Celine M. Vachon
Celine M. Vachon Mayo Clinic
Karla Kerlikowske
Karla Kerlikowske University of California, San Francisco
Neil Risch
Neil Risch University of California, San Francisco
Celeste Eng
Celeste Eng University of California, San Francisco
Alexander P. Reiner
Alexander P. Reiner University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and career pathways beyond the traditional MD route. For those seeking a faster entry into the healthcare sector, fast track lpn programs are a popular option, offering a quick progression into practical nursing roles.

If you are interested in mental health, consider advancing with an msn to pmhnp online degree. This pathway provides specialized skills for working as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner, meeting the growing demand in behavioral health care.

Healthcare administration is another dynamic field for those passionate about management and leadership. You might explore the best online mha programs for comprehensive, flexible training in health systems, or look into cheap mha programs to minimize tuition costs while maximizing career advancement potential.

Each of these online pathways provides unique opportunities for career growth and specialization, helping you tailor your journey in healthcare according to your interests and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Elad Ziv

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles