World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 63 8330 7564 2405 1997 259 16127
Environmental Sciences 66 2075 1980 845 781 265 17033

Diana S. Aga publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diana S. Aga between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diana S. Aga published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2020. 23 of the 302 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2020. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 2 publications
1993 2026

302 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diana S. Aga: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 3
1997 4
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 1
2003 1
2004 3
2005 8
2006 7
2007 20
2008 5
2009 9
2010 7
2011 17
2012 11
2013 7
2014 4
2015 14
2016 18
2017 15
2018 8
2019 14
2020 25
2021 22
2022 14
2023 17
2024 17
2025 21
2026 2
Total 302
Download as CSV

Diana S. Aga publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana S. Aga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 265 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181 265
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Diana S. Aga D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana S. Aga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120 66
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Diana S. Aga is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their work predominantly focuses on the field of Environmental Science, with a particular emphasis on health, toxicology, pollution, and environmental chemistry.

The subfields in which they have published include:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Pollution
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Molecular Biology

The main topics of their research cover:

  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Diana S. Aga has contributed to multiple publications in frequent venues, which include:

  • Environmental Science & Technology (7 publications)
  • The Science of The Total Environment (6 publications)
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (5 publications)
  • ACS ES&T Water (5 publications)
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters (4 publications)

Some of their recent papers are as follows:

  • "A review of recent studies on toxicity, sequestration, and degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)" (2022), Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • "Retrospective analysis of the global antibiotic residues that exceed the predicted no effect concentration for antimicrobial resistance in various environmental matrices" (2020), Environment International
  • "Review on the fate of antimicrobials, antimicrobial resistance genes, and other micropollutants in manure during enhanced anaerobic digestion and composting" (2020), Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • "Prevalence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in drinking and source water from two Asian countries" (2020), Chemosphere
  • "Evaluation of Metagenomic-Enabled Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance at a Conventional Wastewater Treatment Plant" (2021), Frontiers in Microbiology

Diana S. Aga has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Logan Running (14 collaborations)
  • G. Ekin Atilla-Gokcumen (12 collaborations)
  • Joshua S. Wallace (11 collaborations)
  • Rebecca A. Dickman (8 collaborations)
  • Mindula K. Wijayahena (8 collaborations)

Their contributions also include book publications, notably with the American Chemical Society. One such work is titled "Contaminants in Water," published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of the occurrence of antibiotics in four full-scale wastewater treatment plants with varying designs and operations.

    Angela L. Batt;Sungpyo Kim;Diana S. Aga

  • Investigating the Molecular Interactions of Oxytetracycline in Clay and Organic Matter: Insights on Factors Affecting Its Mobility in Soil

    Pankaj Kulshrestha;Rossman F. Giese;Diana S. Aga

  • Removal of Antibiotics in Wastewater: Effect of Hydraulic and Solid Retention Times on the Fate of Tetracycline in the Activated Sludge Process

    Sungpyo Kim;Peter Eichhorn;James N Jensen;A Scott Weber

  • Potential ecological and human health impacts of antibiotics and antibiotic-resistant bacteria from wastewater treatment plants.

    Sungpyo Kim;Diana S. Aga

  • Evaluating the vulnerability of surface waters to antibiotic contamination from varying wastewater treatment plant discharges.

    Angela L. Batt;Ian B. Bruce;Diana S. Aga

  • Lessons learned from more than two decades of research on emerging contaminants in the environment

    Katia Noguera-Oviedo;Diana S. Aga

  • Abundance of six tetracycline resistance genes in wastewater lagoons at cattle feedlots with different antibiotic use strategies

    Nicholas Peak;Charles W. Knapp;Richard K. Yang;Margery M. Hanfelt

  • Occurrence of sulfonamide antimicrobials in private water wells in Washington County, Idaho, USA

    Angela L. Batt;Daniel D. Snow;Diana S. Aga

  • Extremely Cost‐Effective and Efficient Solar Vapor Generation under Nonconcentrated Illumination Using Thermally Isolated Black Paper

    Zhejun Liu;Zhejun Liu;Haomin Song;Dengxin Ji;Chenyu Li

  • Pharmaceutical metabolites in the environment: Analytical challenges and ecological risks

    Mary D. Celiz;Jerry Tso;Diana S. Aga

  • Evaluating the biodegradability of sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfathiazole, and trimethoprim at different stages of sewage treatment

    Sandra Pérez;Peter Eichhorn;Diana S. Aga

  • Humic acid-induced silver nanoparticle formation under environmentally relevant conditions.

    Nelson Akaighe;Robert I. MacCuspie;Divina A. Navarro;Diana S. Aga

  • Toward a Comprehensive Strategy to Mitigate Dissemination of Environmental Sources of Antibiotic Resistance.

    Peter J. Vikesland;Amy Pruden;Pedro J.J. Alvarez;Diana Aga

  • Enhanced biodegradation of iopromide and trimethoprim in nitrifying activated sludge.

    Angela L Batt;Sungpyo Kim;Diana S Aga

  • Simultaneous Analysis of Multiple Classes of Antibiotics by Ion Trap LC/MS/MS for Assessing Surface Water and Groundwater Contamination

    Angela L. Batt;Diana S. Aga

  • A review of recent studies on toxicity, sequestration, and degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)

    Unknown

  • Determination of the Persistence of Tetracycline Antibiotics and Their Degradates in Manure-Amended Soil Using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Liquid Chromatography -Mass Spectrometry

    Diana S. Aga;Seamus O'Connor;Steve Ensley;José O. Payero

  • Assessing antibiotic sorption in soil: a literature review and new case studies on sulfonamides and macrolides

    Stacia R Wegst-Uhrich;Divina Ag Navarro;Lisa Zimmerman;Diana S Aga

  • Fate of Pharmaceuticals in the Environment and in Water Treatment Systems

    Diana S. Aga

  • Elucidating the relative roles of ammonia oxidizing and heterotrophic bacteria during the biotransformation of 17α-Ethinylestradiol and Trimethoprim.

    W. O. Khunjar;S. A. Mackintosh;J. Skotnicka-Pitak;S. Baik

  • Analysis of tetracycline antibiotics in soil : Advances in extraction, clean-up, and quantification

    Seamus O’Connor;Diana S. Aga

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy G. Love
Nancy G. Love University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sandra Pérez
Sandra Pérez Spanish National Research Council
Karl G. Linden
Karl G. Linden University of Colorado Boulder
Damià Barceló
Damià Barceló University of Almería
Amy Pruden
Amy Pruden Virginia Tech
Sarbajit Banerjee
Sarbajit Banerjee Texas A&M University
Shreeram Inamdar
Shreeram Inamdar University of Delaware
Zongfu Yu
Zongfu Yu University of Wisconsin–Madison
Xiang Liu
Xiang Liu Nanjing Tech University
Qiaoqiang Gan
Qiaoqiang Gan King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in diversifying their expertise alongside Environmental Sciences, exploring different online degree options can be highly beneficial. Programs like the best online eds to edd programs offer a clear path for educators aiming to integrate environmental topics into curriculum development and leadership roles.

Those passionate about social impact may consider dsw programs online, which provide advanced knowledge in social work to address community and environmental challenges. These degrees complement environmental science by promoting sustainable social policies.

For individuals seeking flexibility and cost-efficiency, pursuing one of the cheapest online general studies degree programs can be a strategic choice. Such programs allow students to craft their curriculum around environmental subjects and related fields without a heavy financial burden.

Additionally, beginners or those returning to education might find the easiest bachelor degree options appealing for building foundational knowledge before specializing further. This flexibility helps accommodate various learning paces and life commitments while advancing careers tailored to environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Diana S. Aga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles