World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
16379
World Ranking
3550
National Ranking
393

Allan D. Watt publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan D. Watt sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 164 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Allan D. Watt D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allan D. Watt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1960 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Allan D. Watt is affiliated with the Natural Environment Research Council in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several areas including global and planetary change, ecological modelling, genetics, insect science, and general agricultural and biological sciences.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics, notably:

  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Allan D. Watt has contributed extensively to scientific literature. Recent papers include:

  • Grand challenges in entomology: Priorities for action in the coming decades (2023) in Insect Conservation and Diversity
  • The case for open research in entomology: Reducing harm, refining reproducibility and advancing insect science (2024) in Agricultural and Forest Entomology
  • Transformative change for biodiversity requires more inclusive and participatory framing of research agendas (2023) in Biodiversity and Conservation
  • MICESE: A New Method Used for the Formulation of Key Messages from the Scientific Community for the EU Post 2020 Biodiversity Strategy (2020) in Sustainability
  • Issue Information (2021) in Insect Molecular Biology

Key publication venues for the scientist include:

  • Insect Conservation and Diversity
  • Insect Molecular Biology
  • Ecological Entomology
  • Systematic Entomology
  • Agricultural and Forest Entomology

Frequent collaborators in research projects are:

  • Hon Fres
  • Rebecca Farley-Brown
  • Simon Ward
  • Shaun L. Winterton
  • Gia Aradottir

Allan D. Watt has also contributed to book publications, including one titled Transformative change in the global post-2020 Biodiversity Framework. Workshop report 23-25-26 June 2020 published by the Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement.

The scientist received the award of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1960.

Best Publications

  • Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores

    Jeffery S. Bale;Gregory J. Masters;Ian D. Hodkinson;Caroline Awmack

  • Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest

    J. H. Lawton;D. E. Bignell;B. Bolton;G. F. Bloemers;G. F. Bloemers;G. F. Bloemers

  • Understanding and managing conservation conflicts

    Steve M. Redpath;Juliette Young;Anna Evely;William M. Adams

  • Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time

    Anne E. Magurran;Stephen R. Baillie;Stephen T. Buckland;Jan McP. Dick

  • Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe - a review

    Klaus Henle;Didier Alard;Jeremy Clitherow;Paul Cobb

  • Ecology of Insects: Concepts and Applications

    Martin R. Speight;Mark D. Hunter;Allan D. Watt

  • Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe

    Juliette Young;Allan Watt;Peter Nowicki;Didier Alard

  • The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: characteristics and management strategies

    Juliette C. Young;Mariella Marzano;Rehema M. White;David I. McCracken

  • Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation

    Juliette C. Young;Andrew Jordan;Kate R. Searle;Adam Butler

  • Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one-another

    Juliette C. Young;Kerry A. Waylen;Simo Sarkki;Steve Albon

  • Population dynamics of forest insects

    A. D. Watt;S. R. Leather;M. D. Hunter;N. A. C. Kidd

  • The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts

    Juliette C. Young;Kate Searle;Adam Butler;Peter Simmons

  • Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces

    Simo Sarkki;Jari Niemelä;Rob Tinch;Sybille van den Hove;Sybille van den Hove

  • Forests and Insects

    Allan D. Watt;Nigel E Stork;Mark D. Hunter

  • Identifying, managing and monitoring conflicts between forest biodiversity conservation and other human interests in Europe

    J. Niemela;Juliette C. Young;D. Alard;M. Askasibar

  • Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy: A novel scheme to highlight dynamic aspects of science–policy interfaces

    Simo Sarkki;Rob Tinch;Jari Niemelä;Ulrich Heink

  • Effect of land‐use heterogeneity on carabid communities at the landscape scale

    Adam J. Vanbergen;Ben A. Woodcock;Allan D. Watt;Jari Niemelä

  • The diversity and abundance of ants in relation to forest disturbance and plantation establishment in southern Cameroon

    Allan D. Watt;Nigel E. Stork;Barry Bolton

  • Conflicts between Biodiversity Conservation and Human Activities in the Central and Eastern European Countries

    Juliette Young;Caspian Richards;Anke Fischer;Lubos Halada

  • Predicted changes in the synchrony of larval emergence and budburst under climatic warming

    Unknown

  • Population Dynamics of Forest Insects.

    J. P. Dempster;A. D. Watt;S. R. Leather;M. D. Hunter

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam J. Vanbergen
Adam J. Vanbergen INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Simon R. Leather
Simon R. Leather Harper Adams University
Jari Niemelä
Jari Niemelä University of Helsinki
Nigel E. Stork
Nigel E. Stork Griffith University
Thomas Bolger
Thomas Bolger University College Dublin
Adrian C. Newton
Adrian C. Newton James Hutton Institute
Ben A. Woodcock
Ben A. Woodcock UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Klaus Henle
Klaus Henle Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Andrew Jordan
Andrew Jordan University of East Anglia
Susan E. Hartley
Susan E. Hartley University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse professional pathways, including research, conservation, education, and healthcare. Many students interested in these fields also explore related disciplines through online programs, gaining flexible, accredited qualifications that can help transition into new roles or advance their careers.

For those considering healthcare, direct entry msn programs online allow non-nurses to quickly earn a master’s in nursing, building on their science backgrounds. Nursing careers can also be advanced by comparing chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program offerings, helping you find the best online RN to BSN program for your needs.

If you already hold a BSN, there are also bsn to msn programs online that provide affordable and convenient ways to deepen your expertise and boost your career opportunities.

When selecting a program, consider accreditation and institutional reputation. Choosing a non profit online university can ensure you receive a high-quality education with support tailored for online students.

Best Scientists Citing Allan D. Watt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles