World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
71
Citations
15689
World Ranking
20021
National Ranking
9972

Deborah P. Lubeck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah P. Lubeck sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 192 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Deborah P. Lubeck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah P. Lubeck sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deborah P. Lubeck is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focus on topics such as Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies, Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers, Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, and Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments.

Their scholarly work has been published in several academic venues, with frequent contributions appearing in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Value in Health, European Heart Journal, American Journal of Nephrology, and Cancer Reports.

Representative recent publications include:

  • Real World Use and Effects of Calcimimetics in Treating Mineral and Bone Disorder in Hemodialysis Patients (2020), American Journal of Nephrology
  • A longitudinal evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors, treatment patterns, and outcomes in patients with documented cardiovascular disease treated with lipid lowering therapy in the United Kingdom (2020), European Heart Journal
  • Treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma: Analyses of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (2021), Cancer Reports
  • Survival by line of therapy of older patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) (2020), Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Longitudinal evaluation of treatment patterns, risk factors and outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease treated with lipid-lowering therapy in the UK (2022), BMJ Open

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Deborah P. Lubeck include Mark D. Danese, Eduard Sidelnikov, Guillermo Villa, David Catterick, and Michelle Gleeson.

Their research spans multiple subfields within Medicine, including Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Epidemiology. This multidisciplinary approach reflects a diverse interest in clinical outcomes, disease epidemiology, and health economic evaluations.

Best Publications

  • The Changing Face of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Trends in Clinical Presentation and Primary Management

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Deborah P. Lubeck;Maxwell V. Meng;Shilpa S. Mehta

  • Outcomes of self-help education for patients with arthritis

    Kate Lorig;Deborah Lubeck;R. Guy Kraines;Mitchell Seleznick

  • Surrogate End Point for Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy

    Anthony V. D’Amico;Judd W. Moul;Peter R. Carroll;Leon Sun

  • Cancer-Specific Mortality After Surgery or Radiation for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Managed During the Prostate-Specific Antigen Era

    Anthony V. D’Amico;Judd Moul;Peter R. Carroll;Leon Sun

  • THE CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES: LESSONS FROM THE CANCER OF THE PROSTATE STRATEGIC UROLOGIC RESEARCH ENDEAVOR (CAPSURE), A NATIONAL DISEASE REGISTRY

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Jeanette M. Broering;Mark S. Litwin;Deborah P. Lubeck

  • DIFFERENCES IN UROLOGIST AND PATIENT ASSESSMENTS OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF THE CAPSURE DATABASE

    Mark S. Litwin;Deborah P. Lubeck;James M. Henning;Peter R. Carroll

  • Sleep problems and their correlates in a working population

    M Kuppermann;D P Lubeck;P D Mazonson;D L Patrick

  • National Practice Patterns and Time Trends in Androgen Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Gary D. Grossfeld;Deborah P. Lubeck;Peter R. Carroll

  • Time Trends in Clinical Risk Stratification for Prostate Cancer: Implications for Outcomes (Data From CaPSURE)

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Deborah P. Lubeck;Shilpa S. Mehta;Peter R. Carroll

  • SEXUAL FUNCTION AND BOTHER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY OR RADIATION FOR PROSTATE CANCER: MULTIVARIATE QUALITY-OF-LIFE ANALYSIS FROM CaPSURE

    Mark S Litwin;Scott C Flanders;David J Pasta;Marcia L Stoddard

  • The functioning and well-being of patients with unrecognized anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder.

    Warren H Schonfeld;Carol J Verboncoeur;Sheila K Fifer;Ruth C Lipschutz

  • The beneficial outcomes of the arthritis self-management course are not adequately explained by behavior change

    Kate Lorig;Mitchel Seleznick;Deborah Lubeck;Elaine Ung

  • Do impotent men with diabetes have more severe erectile dysfunction and worse quality of life than the general population of impotent patients? Results from the Exploratory Comprehensive Evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction (ExCEED) database.

    David F. Penson;David M. Latini;Deborah P. Lubeck;Katrine L. Wallace

  • The capsure database: a methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer

    Deborah P. Lubeck;Mark S. Litwin;James M. Henning;David M. Stier

  • Untreated Anxiety Among Adult Primary Care Patients in a Health Maintenance Organization

    Sheila K. Fifer;Susan D. Mathias;Donald L. Patrick;Peter D. Mazonson

  • Estimated Life Expectancy and Income of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Compared With Those Without Sickle Cell Disease.

    Deborah Lubeck;Irene Agodoa;Nickhill Bhakta;Mark Danese

  • Necessary but not sufficient: the effect of screening and feedback on outcomes of primary care patients with untreated anxiety.

    Susan D. Mathias;Sheila K. Fifer;Peter D. Mazonson;Deborah P. Lubeck

  • The association between socioeconomic status, health insurance coverage, and quality of life in men with prostate cancer

    David F Penson;Marcia L Stoddard;David J Pasta;Deborah P Lubeck

  • The impact of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: the activities of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared to controls.

    E Yelin;D Lubeck;H Holman;W Epstein

  • Changes in health-related quality of life in the first year after treatment for prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE ☆

    Deborah P Lubeck;Mark S Litwin;James M Henning;Marcia L Stoddard

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter R. Carroll
Peter R. Carroll University of California, San Francisco
Mark S. Litwin
Mark S. Litwin University of California, Los Angeles
James F. Fries
James F. Fries Stanford University
David F. Penson
David F. Penson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Matthew R. Cooperberg
Matthew R. Cooperberg University of California, San Francisco
Tom F. Lue
Tom F. Lue University of California, San Francisco
Anthony V. D'Amico
Anthony V. D'Amico Brigham and Women's Hospital
Judd W. Moul
Judd W. Moul Duke University
Cathy D. Sherbourne
Cathy D. Sherbourne RAND Corporation
Scott D. Ramsey
Scott D. Ramsey Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine goes beyond traditional MD programs. For those looking to work in healthcare or support clinical teams, a variety of flexible and affordable online degrees are available.

For aspiring healthcare professionals interested in medical administration, how much is medical billing and coding school is a common question. These online courses are generally affordable, offering a fast track into the workforce.

Nursing is another popular pathway, with options ranging from entry-level degrees to advanced practice. Many look for the cheapest online FNP programs to become family nurse practitioners without accumulating excessive debt. Entry-level online nursing programs are also widely available, making it easier for students to earn RN or BSN credentials.

Ambitious nurses seeking to advance may consider an online nursing doctoral program to pursue roles in research, education, or healthcare leadership. Collectively, these online degrees open doors to a range of rewarding healthcare careers, combining flexibility, affordability, and professional opportunity.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah P. Lubeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles