World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 69 2331 2216 1052 990 199 20764

David R. Beier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David R. Beier between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David R. Beier published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 1997. 7 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 1997. 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1982 2026

229 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David R. Beier: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 2
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 4
1994 7
1995 7
1996 4
1997 18
1998 15
1999 15
2000 6
2001 7
2002 14
2003 6
2004 1
2005 4
2006 6
2007 7
2008 9
2009 10
2010 13
2011 8
2012 8
2013 4
2014 3
2015 5
2016 7
2017 3
2018 3
2019 5
2020 1
2021 1
2022 5
2023 5
2024 1
2025 6
2026 1
Total 229
Download as CSV

David R. Beier publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Beier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 199 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173 199
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

David R. Beier D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Beier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164 69
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

David R. Beier is affiliated with Seattle Children's Hospital in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, with a focus on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Within these broader categories, their work delves into molecular biology, genetics, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, and cell biology.

They have published extensively on subjects including renal and related cancers, cardiac fibrosis and remodeling, genetic and kidney cyst diseases, Hedgehog signaling pathway studies, epigenetics and DNA methylation, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and RNA research and splicing.

Their recent publications encompass a range of topics and venues:

  • Spiny mice activate unique transcriptional programs after severe kidney injury regenerating organ function without fibrosis (2021, iScience)
  • Single-cell, whole-embryo phenotyping of mammalian developmental disorders (2023, Nature)
  • Isolation and Characterization of Adult Cardiac Fibroblasts and Myofibroblasts (2020, Journal of Visualized Experiments)
  • Reelin Mediates Hippocampal Cajal-Retzius Cell Positioning and Infrapyramidal Blade Morphogenesis (2020, Journal of Developmental Biology)
  • Mammalian organ regeneration in spiny mice (2022, Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility)

David R. Beier frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • Elizabeth D. Nguyen
  • Daryl M. Okamura
  • Mark W. Majesky
  • Sarah Collins
  • Scott Houghtaling

Their research is also regularly published in several scientific venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • G3 Genes Genomes Genetics
  • Developmental Biology

Best Publications

  • PRDM16 controls a brown fat/skeletal muscle switch

    Patrick Seale;Bryan Bjork;Wenli Yang;Shingo Kajimura

  • The hematopoietic growth factor KL is encoded by the Sl locus and is the ligand of the c-kit receptor, the gene product of the W locus.

    Eric Huang;Karl Nocka;David R. Beier;Tang-Yan Chu

  • Mutations at the murine motheaten locus are within the hematopoietic cell protein-tyrosine phosphatase (Hcph) gene.

    Leonard D. Shultz;Peter A. Schweitzer;T.V. Rajan;Taolin Yi

  • The cloche and spadetail genes differentially affect hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis.

    M. A. Thompson;D. G. Ransom;S. J. Pratt;H. Maclennan

  • Mucosal T lymphocyte numbers are selectively reduced in integrin alpha E (CD103)-deficient mice

    Michael P. Schön;Anu Arya;Elizabeth A. Murphy;Cassandra M. Adams

  • The murine IL-13 receptor alpha 2: molecular cloning, characterization, and comparison with murine IL-13 receptor alpha 1.

    Debra D. Donaldson;Matthew J. Whitters;Lori J. Fitz;Tamlyn Yee Neben

  • Agouti C57BL/6N embryonic stem cells for mouse genetic resources.

    Stephen J. Pettitt;Qi Liang;Xin Y. Rairdan;Jennifer L. Moran;Jennifer L. Moran

  • Naturally occurring mutations in the human 5-lipoxygenase gene promoter that modify transcription factor binding and reporter gene transcription.

    K H In;K Asano;D Beier;J Grobholz

  • A fibrillar collagen gene, Col11a1, is essential for skeletal morphogenesis

    Y Li;D.A Lacerda;M.L Warman;D.R Beier

  • Mouse Eya homologues of the Drosophila eyes absent gene require Pax6 for expression in lens and nasal placode

    Pin-Xian Xu;Ian Woo;Helen Her;David R. Beier

  • THM1 negatively modulates mouse sonic hedgehog signal transduction and affects retrograde intraflagellar transport in cilia

    Pamela V Tran;Courtney J Haycraft;Tatiana Y Besschetnova;Annick Turbe-Doan

  • Quantitative locus analysis of airway hyperresponsiveness in A/J and C57BL/6J mice.

    G T De Sanctis;M Merchant;D R Beier;R D Dredge

  • Impaired organic anion transport in kidney and choroid plexus of organic anion transporter 3 (Oat3 (Slc22a8)) knockout mice.

    Douglas H. Sweet;David S. Miller;John B. Pritchard;Yuko Fujiwara

  • Parental-specific methylation of an imprinted transgene is established during gametogenesis and progressively changes during embryogenesis.

    J.Richard Chaillet;Thomas F. Vogt;David R. Beier;Philip Leder

  • Molecular cloning and chromosome localization of a putative basolateral Na(+)-K(+)-2Cl- cotransporter from mouse inner medullary collecting duct (mIMCD-3) cells.

    E Delpire;M I Rauchman;D R Beier;S C Hebert

  • Cystin, a novel cilia-associated protein, is disrupted in the cpk mouse model of polycystic kidney disease

    Xiaoying Hou;Michal Mrug;Bradley K. Yoder;Elliot J. Lefkowitz

  • The IFT-A Complex Regulates Shh Signaling through Cilia Structure and Membrane Protein Trafficking

    Karel F. Liem;Alyson Ashe;Mu He;Mu He;Peter Satir

  • A defect in a novel Nek-family kinase causes cystic kidney disease in the mouse and in zebrafish.

    Shanming Liu;Weining Lu;Tomoko Obara;Shiei Kuida

  • Amyloid accelerates tau propagation and toxicity in a model of early Alzheimer’s disease

    Amy M Pooler;Amy M Pooler;Manuela Polydoro;Eduardo A Maury;Samantha B Nicholls

  • Fog2 Is Required for Normal Diaphragm and Lung Development in Mice and Humans

    Kate G Ackerman;Bruce J Herron;Sara O Vargas;Hailu Huang

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer L. Moran
Jennifer L. Moran Broad Institute
Shamil R. Sunyaev
Shamil R. Sunyaev Harvard University
Jeffrey M. Drazen
Jeffrey M. Drazen Harvard University
Jagesh V. Shah
Jagesh V. Shah Harvard University
Mark J. Daly
Mark J. Daly Massachusetts General Hospital
Daniel G. MacArthur
Daniel G. MacArthur Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Robert F. Hevner
Robert F. Hevner University of California, San Diego
Sanjay K. Nigam
Sanjay K. Nigam University of California, San Diego
Roderick T. Bronson
Roderick T. Bronson Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics opens the door to a range of online degrees and career options in related fields. Many students consider combining their Genetics education with practical credentials, such as those from online medical coding programs, which complement scientific skills with medical administrative knowledge.

For those eager to accelerate their studies and join the workforce quickly, fast track program options can help you earn degrees or certifications in less time. Alternatively, if you need more flexibility to balance your studies with other commitments, consider enrolling in a self paced degree where you can learn at your own speed.

Getting started is now easier than ever, with many institutions offering a free online college application process, lowering barriers to entry for aspiring Genetics professionals. Each of these pathways offers unique advantages for students looking to build a career grounded in genetics and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing David R. Beier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles