World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 54 2307 2075 183 166 99 14996

David Ish-Horowicz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Ish-Horowicz between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Ish-Horowicz published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2002. 1 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2002. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 5 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 5 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1973 2025

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Ish-Horowicz: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 3
1980 1
1981 5
1982 5
1983 2
1984 3
1985 2
1986 2
1987 1
1988 0
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 3
1997 3
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 4
2002 7
2003 4
2004 6
2005 2
2006 2
2007 0
2008 4
2009 3
2010 7
2011 1
2012 1
2013 1
2014 5
2015 0
2016 0
2017 2
2018 0
2019 1
2020 3
2021 0
2022 2
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 111
Download as CSV

David Ish-Horowicz publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Ish-Horowicz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 99 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131 99
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

David Ish-Horowicz D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Ish-Horowicz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116 54
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

David Ish-Horowicz is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research primarily spans molecular biology, with additional work touching on cardiology, cardiovascular medicine, plant science, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics within molecular and developmental biology, including RNA research and splicing, gene regulation, genomics, chromatin dynamics, nuclear structure and function, cardiomyopathy and myosin studies, plant molecular biology, as well as neurobiology and insect physiology.

Key publication venues for Ish-Horowicz include:

  • Biology Open
  • eLife
  • The Journal of Cell Biology
  • RNA
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ish-Horowicz feature studies on neural stem cell growth, synapse formation, and mRNA stability:

  • "Imp/IGF2BP levels modulate individual neural stem cell growth and division through myc mRNA stability" (2020, eLife)
  • "Syncrip/hnRNP Q is required for activity-induced Msp300/Nesprin-1 expression and new synapse formation" (2020, The Journal of Cell Biology)
  • "Neuronal upregulation of Prospero protein is driven by alternative mRNA polyadenylation and Syncrip-mediated mRNA stabilisation" (2020, Biology Open)
  • "Greb1 is required for axial elongation and segmentation in vertebrate embryos" (2020, Biology Open)
  • "Dynamically regulated transcription factors are encoded by highly unstable mRNAs in the Drosophila larval brain" (2023, RNA)

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Ilan Davis, Aino I. Järvelin, Tamsin J. Samuels, Mary Kay Thompson, and Arianna Ceccarelli.

David Ish-Horowicz has been recognized through election as a Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom in 2002 and is also a member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

Best Publications

  • Expression of a Delta homologue in prospective neurons in the chick

    Domingos Henrique;Julie Adam;Anna Myat;Ajay Chitnis

  • Avian hairy Gene Expression Identifies a Molecular Clock Linked to Vertebrate Segmentation and Somitogenesis

    Isabel Palmeirim;Domingos Henrique;David Ish-Horowicz;Olivier Pourquié

  • Primary neurogenesis in Xenopus embryos regulated by a homologue of the Drosophila neurogenic gene Delta.

    Ajay Chitnis;Domingos Henrique;Julian Lewis;David Ish-Horowicz

  • Notch signalling and the synchronization of the somite segmentation clock.

    Yun-Jin Jiang;Birgit L. Aerne;Lucy Smithers;Catherine Haddon

  • Groucho is required for Drosophila neurogenesis, segmentation, and sex determination and interacts directly with hairy-related bHLH proteins

    Paroush Z;Finley Rl;Kidd T;Wainwright Sm

  • Maintenance of neuroepithelial progenitor cells by Delta-Notch signalling in the embryonic chick retina.

    Domingos Henrique;Estelle Hirsinger;Julie Adam;Isabelle Le Roux

  • A chick homologue of Serrate and its relationship with Notch and Delta homologues during central neurogenesis

    Anna Myat;Domingos Henrique;David Ish-Horowicz;Julian Lewis

  • Delta-like 1 is necessary for the generation of marginal zone B cells but not T cells in vivo.

    Katsuto Hozumi;Naoko Negishi;Daisuke Suzuki;Natsumi Abe

  • Notch signalling is required for cyclic expression of the hairy-like gene HES1 in the presomitic mesoderm

    C. Jouve;I. Palmeirim;D. Henrique;J. Beckers

  • Delta4, an endothelial specific Notch ligand expressed at sites of physiological and tumor angiogenesis

    Carolina Mailhos;Ute Modlich;Julian Lewis;Adrian Harris

  • Conserved signals and machinery for RNA transport in Drosophila oogenesis and embryogenesis.

    Simon L. Bullock;David Ish-Horowicz

  • Cell fate choices and the expression of Notch, Delta and Serrate homologues in the chick inner ear: parallels with Drosophila sense-organ development.

    J. Adam;A. Myat;I. Le Roux;M. Eddison

  • Groucho acts as a corepressor for a subset of negative regulators, including Hairy and Engrailed

    Gerardo Jiménez;Ze’ev Paroush;David Ish-Horowicz

  • Serrate1-induced Notch signalling regulates the decision between immunity and tolerance made by peripheral CD4+ T cells

    Gerard F. Hoyne;Isabelle Le Roux;Marta Corsin-Jimenez;Karen Tan

  • Extrachromosomal circular copies of the eukaryotic transposable element copia in cultured Drosophila cells

    Andrew J. Flavell;David Ish-Horowicz

  • The Groucho/TLE/Grg family of transcriptional co-repressors

    Barbara H Jennings;David Ish-Horowicz

  • Apical localization of pair-rule transcripts requires 3' sequences and limits protein diffusion in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo.

    Ilan Davis;David Ish-Horowicz

  • Periodic Lunatic fringe expression is controlled during segmentation by a cyclic transcriptional enhancer responsive to notch signaling.

    Aixa V. Morales;Yuko Yasuda;David Ish-Horowicz

  • Molecular Recognition of Transcriptional Repressor Motifs by the WD Domain of the Groucho/TLE Corepressor

    Barbara H. Jennings;Laura M. Pickles;S. Mark Wainwright;S. Mark Roe

  • Notch signalling acts in postmitotic avian myogenic cells to control MyoD activation.

    E. Hirsinger;P. Malapert;J. Dubrulle;M.C. Delfini

Frequent Co-Authors

Domingos Henrique
Domingos Henrique University of Lisbon
Julian Lewis
Julian Lewis Cancer Research UK London Research Institute
Tzumin Lee
Tzumin Lee University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew J. Flavell
Andrew J. Flavell University of Dundee
Olivier Pourquié
Olivier Pourquié Brigham and Women's Hospital
Shoukat Dedhar
Shoukat Dedhar University of British Columbia
Giampietro Schiavo
Giampietro Schiavo University College London
Laurence H. Pearl
Laurence H. Pearl University of Sussex
Scott Waddell
Scott Waddell University of Oxford
Michael John Owen
Michael John Owen Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers within healthcare and research. For students interested in combining their biology background with direct patient care, nursing is a popular path. There are accelerated bsn programs for non nurses that allow graduates from science fields to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing in a shorter timeframe. This is particularly helpful for those looking to transition quickly into nursing roles.

For registered nurses seeking career advancement, pursuing further education is key. The fastest rn to bsn program options enable RNs to elevate their qualifications in as little as six months, providing both flexibility and speed.

Those considering advanced practice roles may wonder how many years to become a nurse practitioner are required. Intensive academic programs can streamline this process, making it possible to enter specialized positions more quickly.

Salary prospects also matter. Specialties such as psychiatric nursing offer competitive compensation; you can review the latest data on dnp pmhnp salary by state to help plan your professional path.

Best Scientists Citing David Ish-Horowicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles