World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

David H. Miller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Miller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David H. Miller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Miller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David H. Miller is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, particularly focusing on pathology, molecular biology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, family practice, and immunology. Their research primarily addresses Multiple Sclerosis and related neurological conditions.

The main topics covered in their scholarly work include:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
  • Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Frequent co-authors with whom Miller has collaborated multiple times are:

  • Lea Glass-Marmor
  • Elsebeth Staun-Ram
  • Efrat Neter
  • Anat Wolkowitz
  • Dimitrios Karussis

The scientist's publications appear frequently in the following venues:

  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Neurology
  • Patient Preference and Adherence
  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Significant research papers authored or co-authored by David H. Miller include:

  • "Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: An Israeli Multi-Center Experience Following 3 Vaccine Doses" (2022), published in Frontiers in Immunology
  • "Dimethyl fumarate promotes B cell-mediated anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in B and T cells, and inhibits immune cell migration in patients with MS" (2020), published in Journal of Neuroimmunology
  • "Beliefs about medication as predictors of medication adherence in a prospective cohort study among persons with multiple sclerosis" (2021), published in BMC Neurology
  • "Mobile phone-based e-diary for assessment and enhancement of medications adherence among patients with multiple sclerosis" (2020), published in Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental Translational and Clinical
  • "Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Gut Microbiome in the Israeli Diverse Populations: Associations with Ethnicity, Gender, Disability Status, Vitamin D Levels, and Mediterranean Diet" (2023), published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences

David H. Miller's research contributions focus particularly on immune responses, medication adherence, and the interaction between gut microbiome and multiple sclerosis, demonstrating a multidisciplinary approach spanning immunology, neurology, and molecular biology. Their studies often involve examination of patient populations, adherence behavioral patterns, and biological markers related to neuroimmunological disorders.

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria

    Alan J. Thompson;Brenda L. Banwell;Frederik Barkhof;Frederik Barkhof;William M. Carroll

  • A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis

    Chris H. Polman;Eva Havrdova;Michael Hutchinson;Ludwig Kappos

  • Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Oral BG-12 or Glatiramer in Multiple Sclerosis

    Robert J Fox;David H Miller;J Theodore Phillips;Michael Hutchinson

  • A Longitudinal Study of Abnormalities on MRI and Disability from Multiple Sclerosis

    Peter A Brex;Olga Ciccarelli;Jonathon I O'Riordan;Michael Sailer

  • Disability and T2 MRI lesions: a 20-year follow-up of patients with relapse onset of multiple sclerosis.

    L. K. Fisniku;P. A. Brex;D. R. Altmann;K. A. Miszkiel

  • Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain

    Klaus Schmierer;Francesco Scaravilli;Daniel R. Altmann;Daniel R. Altmann;Gareth J. Barker;Gareth J. Barker

  • Measurement of atrophy in multiple sclerosis: pathological basis, methodological aspects and clinical relevance

    David H Miller;Frederik Barkhof;Joseph A Frank;Geoffrey J M Parker

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis.

    D.J. Werring;C.A. Clark;G.J. Barker;A.J. Thompson

  • The role of magnetic resonance techniques in understanding and managing multiple sclerosis

    D H Miller;R I Grossman;S C Reingold;H F McFarland

  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges

    Wallace J Brownlee;Todd A Hardy;Franz Fazekas;David H Miller;David H Miller

  • Retinal nerve fiber layer axonal loss and visual dysfunction in optic neuritis.

    S Anand Trip;S Anand Trip;Patricio G Schlottmann;Stephen J Jones;Daniel R Altmann;Daniel R Altmann

  • Gray matter atrophy is related to long-term disability in multiple sclerosis.

    Leonora K. Fisniku;Declan T. Chard;Jonathan S. Jackson;Valerie M. Anderson

  • The prognostic value of brain MRI in clinically isolated syndromes of the CNS. A 10-year follow-up.

    J. I. O'riordan;A. J. Thompson;D. P. E. Kingsley;D. G. Macmanus

  • Clinically isolated syndromes

    David H Miller;Declan T Chard;Olga Ciccarelli

  • Efficacy and safety of oral fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study

    Ludwig Kappos;Ralf Gold;David H Miller;David G MacManus

  • Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis

    Massimo Filippi;Maria A. Rocca;Frederik Barkhof;Wolfgang Brück

  • Vitamin D as an early predictor of multiple sclerosis activity and progression.

    Alberto Ascherio;Kassandra L. Munger;Rick White;Karl Köchert

  • Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study

    Ludwig Kappos;Mark S Freedman;Chris H Polman;Gilles Edan

  • Brain atrophy in clinically early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

    D. T. Chard;C. M. Griffin;G. J. M. Parker;R. Kapoor

  • Diffusion tensor imaging can detect and quantify corticospinal tract degeneration after stroke

    David J. Werring;Ahmed T. Toosy;Christopher A. Clark;Geoffrey J M Parker

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott
Claudia A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott University College London
Daniel R. Altmann
Daniel R. Altmann Imperial College London
Tarek A. Yousry
Tarek A. Yousry University College London
Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
Robert A. Shearer
Robert A. Shearer Facebook (United States)
Henry Houlden
Henry Houlden University College London
Marina Pajic
Marina Pajic Garvan Institute of Medical Research
John Hardy
John Hardy University College London
Nicola Waddell
Nicola Waddell QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Andrew V. Biankin
Andrew V. Biankin University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a traditional medical degree in the USA requires significant commitment, but a variety of online degree programs open alternative pathways into the healthcare field. These programs are often more affordable, flexible, and accessible, allowing students to advance their education while balancing personal and professional responsibilities.

For aspiring nursing leaders, best dnp programs online offer a Doctor of Nursing Practice for those seeking advanced clinical or leadership roles. Pharmacists can explore online pharmacy schools to gain their PharmD credential with options that suit their schedules.

Technology-oriented students might choose a healthcare information systems career by enrolling in him programs. These develop vital skills in managing patient data, privacy, and health informatics. Additionally, medical billing and coding certification online enables students to quickly enter the workforce by learning the essentials of medical data processing and insurance claims.

By considering these online degree options, students can find educational and career pathways that align with their interests, goals, and life situations within the dynamic healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing David H. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles