World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 46 18954 17371 7740 6896 105 7316

David F. Bishop publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David F. Bishop between 1967 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David F. Bishop published across 54 years, from 1967 to 2020, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1987. 2 of the 107 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 1987. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 4 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication
1967 2020

107 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David F. Bishop: publications per year, 1967 to 2020
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 2
1981 3
1982 2
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 4
1987 8
1988 4
1989 6
1990 8
1991 3
1992 4
1993 8
1994 4
1995 3
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 4
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 2
2010 4
2011 3
2012 3
2013 4
2014 2
2015 1
2016 1
2017 2
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
Total 107
Download as CSV

David F. Bishop publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Bishop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 105 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546 105
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

David F. Bishop D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Bishop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504 46
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David F. Bishop is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with subfields including Molecular Biology, Rheumatology, Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The topics central to their work encompass Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders, Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide, Folate and B Vitamins Research, Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology, Blood properties and coagulation, as well as Lipid metabolism and disorders.

Among recent publications, notable papers include the 2020 article "Human aminolevulinate synthase structure reveals a eukaryotic-specific autoinhibitory loop regulating substrate binding and product release" published in Nature Communications, and another 2020 paper titled "X-linked macrocytic dyserythropoietic anemia in females with an ALAS2 mutation" featured in the Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David F. Bishop are:

  • H. Bailey
  • G.A. Bezerra
  • Jason R. Marcero
  • Siladitya Padhi
  • William R. Foster

Publications are also frequently found in these venues:

  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation

Best Publications

  • An atypical variant of Fabry's disease with manifestations confined to the myocardium.

    von Scheidt W;Eng Cm;Fitzmaurice Tf;Erdmann E

  • Human ABC7 transporter: gene structure and mutation causing X-linked sideroblastic anemia with ataxia with disruption of cytosolic iron-sulfur protein maturation

    Soumeya Bekri;Gyula Kispal;Gyula Kispal;Gyula Kispal;Heike Lange;Edward Fitzsimons

  • Human alpha-galactosidase A: nucleotide sequence of a cDNA clone encoding the mature enzyme.

    David F. Bishop;David H. Calhoun;Harold S. Bernstein;Petros Hantzopoulos

  • Acute Porphyrias in the USA: Features of 108 Subjects from Porphyrias Consortium

    Herbert L. Bonkovsky;Vinaya C. Maddukuri;Cemal Yazici;Karl E. Anderson

  • Structural organization of the human alpha-galactosidase A gene: further evidence for the absence of a 3' untranslated region.

    David F. Bishop;Ruth Kornreich;Robert J. Desnick

  • Human δ-aminolevulinate synthase: Assignment of the housekeeping gene to 3p21 and the erythroid-specific gene to the X chromosome

    David F. Bishop;Ann S. Henderson;Kenneth H. Astrin

  • Overexpression of human alpha-galactosidase A results in its intracellular aggregation, crystallization in lysosomes, and selective secretion.

    Y A Ioannou;D F Bishop;R J Desnick

  • Nucleotide sequence of the human α-galactosidase A gene

    Ruth Kornreich;Robert J. Desnick;David F. Bishop

  • Fabry disease: six gene rearrangements and an exonic point mutation in the alpha-galactosidase gene.

    H S Bernstein;D F Bishop;K H Astrin;R Kornreich

  • Enzymatic defect in "X-linked" sideroblastic anemia: molecular evidence for erythroid delta-aminolevulinate synthase deficiency.

    Philip D. Cotter;Martin Baumann;David F. Bishop

  • Identification of point mutations in the alpha-galactosidase A gene in classical and atypical hemizygotes with Fabry disease.

    H Sakuraba;A Oshima;Y Fukuhara;M Shimmoto

  • Alpha-galactosidase A gene rearrangements causing Fabry disease. Identification of short direct repeats at breakpoints in an Alu-rich gene.

    R Kornreich;D F Bishop;R J Desnick

  • Affinity purification of alpha-galactosidase A from human spleen, placenta, and plasma with elimination of pyrogen contamination. Properties of the purified splenic enzyme compared to other forms.

    D F Bishop;R J Desnick

  • Human delta-aminolevulinate dehydratase: nucleotide sequence of a full-length cDNA clone

    James G. Wetmur;David F. Bishop;Christopher Cantelmo;Robert J. Desnick

  • δ-Aminolevulinic Acid Dehydratase Isozymes and Lead Toxicitya

    K. H. Astrin;D. F. Bishop;J. G. Wetmur;B. Kaul

  • Neuroaxonal dystrophy due to lysosomal alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase deficiency.

    Detlev Schindler;David F. Bishop;David E. Wolfe;Anne M. Wang

  • Enzyme therapy in Fabry disease: differential in vivo plasma clearance and metabolic effectiveness of plasma and splenic alpha-galactosidase A isozymes

    Robert J. Desnick;Kenneth J. Dean;Gregory Grabowski;David F. Bishop

  • Uroporphyrinogen III synthase erythroid promoter mutations in adjacent GATA1 and CP2 elements cause congenital erythropoietic porphyria

    Constanza Solis;Gerardo I. Aizencang;Kenneth H. Astrin;David F. Bishop

  • Late-onset X-linked sideroblastic anemia. Missense mutations in the erythroid delta-aminolevulinate synthase (ALAS2) gene in two pyridoxine-responsive patients initially diagnosed with acquired refractory anemia and ringed sideroblasts.

    P. D. Cotter;A. May;E. J. Fitzsimons;T. Houston

  • Familial-skewed X-chromosome inactivation as a predisposing factor for late-onset X-linked sideroblastic anemia in carrier females.

    Mario Cazzola;Mario Cazzola;Mario Cazzola;Alison May;Alison May;Alison May;Gaetano Bergamaschi;Gaetano Bergamaschi;Gaetano Bergamaschi;Paola Cerani;Paola Cerani;Paola Cerani

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Desnick
Robert J. Desnick Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
James G. Wetmur
James G. Wetmur Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Shih-Feng Tsai
Shih-Feng Tsai National Health Research Institutes
Charles C. Sweeley
Charles C. Sweeley Michigan State University
Herbert L. Bonkovsky
Herbert L. Bonkovsky Wake Forest University
Andrej Hasilik
Andrej Hasilik Philipp University of Marburg
John A. Martignetti
John A. Martignetti Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Vijay G. Sankaran
Vijay G. Sankaran Harvard University
Vern L. Schramm
Vern L. Schramm Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Harry A. Dailey
Harry A. Dailey University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry often leads students to diverse healthcare careers that require both scientific knowledge and specialized training. A growing number of these careers are now accessible through flexible online programs that can fit around work or family schedules.

For those interested in patient diagnostics, consider ultrasound tech programs online or rad tech online programs. These fields use imaging technology to help doctors diagnose and treat diseases.

Nutrition and wellness are also popular pathways. If you are drawn to helping people achieve better health through diet, check out the best dietetics programs available online. For students looking to directly support healthcare teams, online medical assisting classes provide a quick route into clinical and administrative roles.

These online options make it easier than ever to pursue a health science career. They offer affordability, accessibility, and the practical skills needed to succeed in today's competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Bishop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles