World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
26982
World Ranking
11425
National Ranking
123

Claus Yding Andersen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus Yding Andersen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 404 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Claus Yding Andersen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus Yding Andersen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women

    Didier Dewailly;Claus Yding Andersen;Adam H Balen;Frank Jm Broekmans

  • Cancer and fertility preservation: international recommendations from an expert meeting

    Matteo Lambertini;Lucia Del Mastro;Maria M.C. Pescio;Claus Yding Andersen

  • Restoration of ovarian activity and pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a review of 60 cases of reimplantation.

    Jacques Donnez;Marie-Madeleine Dolmans;Antonio Pellicer;Cesar Diaz-Garcia

  • Two successful pregnancies following autotransplantation of frozen/thawed ovarian tissue.

    Claus Yding Andersen;Mikkel Rosendahl;Anne Grete Byskov;Anne Loft

  • GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study

    P. Humaidan;H. Ejdrup Bredkjær;L. Bungum;M. Bungum

  • Children born after autotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: A review of 13 live births

    Jacques Donnez;Sherman Silber;Claus Yding Andersen;Isabelle Demeestere

  • Which follicles make the most anti-Müllerian hormone in humans? Evidence for an abrupt decline in AMH production at the time of follicle selection

    J Jeppesen;Richard Anderson;T W Kelsey;S L Christiansen

  • Chemical structure of sterols that activate oocyte meiosis

    A G Byskov;C Y Andersen;L Nordholm;H Thøgersen

  • Does weight loss improve semen quality and reproductive hormones? results from a cohort of severely obese men

    Linn Berger Håkonsen;Ane Marie Thulstrup;Anette Skærbech Aggerholm;Jørn Olsen

  • Risk of transferring malignant cells with transplanted frozen-thawed ovarian tissue

    Marie-Madeleine Dolmans;Valérie Luyckx;Jacques Donnez;Claus Yding Andersen

  • Increased risk of early pregnancy loss by profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women undergoing assisted reproduction.

    Lars G. Westergaard;Steen B. Laursen;Claus Yding Andersen

  • 1,500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin administered at oocyte retrieval rescues the luteal phase when gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is used for ovulation induction: a prospective, randomized, controlled study

    Peter Humaidan;Helle Ejdrup Bredkjær;Lars Grabow Westergaard;Claus Yding Andersen

  • 86 successful births and 9 ongoing pregnancies worldwide in women transplanted with frozen-thawed ovarian tissue: focus on birth and perinatal outcome in 40 of these children

    Annette Klüver Jensen;Kirsten Tryde Macklon;Jens Fedder;Erik Ernst

  • Genetic insights into biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing.

    Katherine S. Ruth;Felix R. Day;Jazib Hussain;Ana Martínez-Marchal

  • Evidence of residual disease in cryopreserved ovarian cortex from female patients with leukemia

    Mikkel Rosendahl;Morten Tolstrup Andersen;Elisabeth Ralfkiær;Lars Kjeldsen

  • Density and distribution of primordial follicles in single pieces of cortex from 21 patients and in individual pieces of cortex from three entire human ovaries

    K.L.T. Schmidt;A.G. Byskov;A. Nyboe Andersen;J. Müller

  • Gene expression profiles of single human mature oocytes in relation to age

    M.L. Grøndahl;M.L. Grøndahl;C. Yding Andersen;J. Bogstad;F.C. Nielsen

  • Cumulus cells of oocyte-cumulus complexes secrete a meiosis-activating substance when stimulated with FSH

    Anne Grete Byskov;Claus Yding Andersen;Alireza Hossaini;Xia Guoliang

  • Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives.

    Francisca Martinez;Claus Yding Andersen;P.N. Barri;Robert Brannigan

  • Corrigendum to The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women [Hum Reprod Update, 20 (2014) 370-385]

    Didier Dewailly;Claus Yding Andersen;Adam Balen;Frank Broekmans

Frequent Co-Authors

Kjeld Møllgård
Kjeld Møllgård University of Copenhagen
Richard A. Anderson
Richard A. Anderson University of Edinburgh
Claus Oxvig
Claus Oxvig Aarhus University
Jacques Donnez
Jacques Donnez Université Catholique de Louvain
Søren T. Christensen
Søren T. Christensen University of Copenhagen
Jens Peter Bonde
Jens Peter Bonde University of Copenhagen
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Jørn Olsen
Jørn Olsen Aarhus University
Antonio Pellicer
Antonio Pellicer University of Valencia
Melissa C. Southey
Melissa C. Southey Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in healthcare can offer flexible and accessible routes to advance your career. For registered nurses seeking advanced practice roles, an rn to np bridge program provides a pathway from associate degrees to nurse practitioner credentials, often streamlining the process for working professionals.

If you’re interested in nutrition and holistic health, earning an online dietitian degree can open doors in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, and public health. These programs typically cover coursework in food science, wellness strategies, and nutrition counseling.

Healthcare leadership and management roles are also within reach through cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs. Such degrees are valuable for professionals aiming to lead hospitals, clinics, or health systems.

Additionally, some RNs may prefer to advance their education without direct clinical training requirements. Options like online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements enable nurses to gain theoretical knowledge and enhance their credentials entirely online.

These diverse pathways can help tailor your medical career to fit your professional interests and life circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Claus Yding Andersen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles