World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10398 9760 411 398 575 36512

Chris H. Bangma publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chris H. Bangma between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chris H. Bangma published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2009. 8 of the 576 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2009. 1994: 3 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 58 publications 2010: 43 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 56 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 16 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
1994 2025

576 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chris H. Bangma: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 3
1995 9
1996 3
1997 8
1998 3
1999 1
2000 4
2001 5
2002 4
2003 6
2004 8
2005 14
2006 17
2007 19
2008 22
2009 58
2010 43
2011 28
2012 56
2013 37
2014 19
2015 30
2016 19
2017 29
2018 21
2019 30
2020 28
2021 27
2022 1
2023 16
2024 5
2025 3
Total 576
Download as CSV

Chris H. Bangma publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris H. Bangma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 575 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 575
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Chris H. Bangma D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris H. Bangma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Chris H. Bangma is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. The primary focus of their research lies within the field of Medicine, with particular emphasis on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Surgery, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Their work centers on prostate cancer and related diagnostic and treatment methods, as well as the application of radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging.

The main topics of Chris H. Bangma's research include:

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bangma comprise:

  • Monique J. Roobol
  • Ivo G. Schoots
  • Sebastiaan Remmers
  • Muhammad Arif
  • Jose M. Castillo T.

Bangma has contributed to several publication venues, notably:

  • European Urology
  • European Urology Open Science
  • European Urology Oncology
  • European Radiology
  • The Lancet Oncology

Among the recent papers published are:

  • "Clinically significant prostate cancer detection and segmentation in low-risk patients using a convolutional neural network on multi-parametric MRI" (2020, European Radiology)
  • "A prospective prostate cancer screening programme for men with pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (IMPACT): initial results from an international prospective study" (2021, The Lancet Oncology)
  • "Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer" (2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
  • "A Multi-Center, Multi-Vendor Study to Evaluate the Generalizability of a Radiomics Model for Classifying Prostate cancer: High Grade vs. Low Grade" (2021, Diagnostics)
  • "Classification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multi-Parametric MRI: A Validation Study Comparing Deep Learning and Radiomics" (2021, Cancers)

Best Publications

  • Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study

    Fritz H. Schröder;Jonas Hugosson;Monique J. Roobol;Stefano Ciatto

  • Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up

    Fritz H Schröder;Jonas Hugosson;Monique J Roobol;Teuvo L J Tammela

  • Prostate-Cancer Mortality at 11 Years of Follow-up

    Fritz H. Schröder;Jonas Hugosson;Monique J. Roobol;Stefano Ciatto

  • Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ivo G. Schoots;Monique J. Roobol;Daan Nieboer;Chris H. Bangma

  • Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study

    Meelan Bul;Xiaoye Zhu;Riccardo Valdagni;Tom Pickles

  • A Multicenter Study of [-2]Pro-Prostate Specific Antigen Combined With Prostate Specific Antigen and Free Prostate Specific Antigen for Prostate Cancer Detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml Prostate Specific Antigen Range

    William J. Catalona;Alan W. Partin;Martin G. Sanda;John T. Wei

  • Prostate MRI, with or without MRI‐targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer

    Frankâ€Jan H Drost;Daniël F Osses;Daan Nieboer;Ewout W Steyerberg

  • Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    A. Horwich;C. Parker;Chris Bangma;Vesa Kataja

  • A 16-yr Follow-up of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

    Jonas Hugosson;Monique J. Roobol;Marianne Månsson;Teuvo L.J. Tammela

  • Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening.

    Eveline A M Heijnsdijk;Elisabeth M Wever;Anssi Auvinen;Jonas Hugosson

  • Infectious complications and hospital admissions after prostate biopsy in a European randomized trial.

    Stacy Loeb;Suzanne van den Heuvel;Xiaoye Zhu;Chris H. Bangma

  • A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study : an Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment

    Leonard P. Bokhorst;Riccardo Valdagni;Antti Rannikko;Yoshiyuki Kakehi

  • A risk-based strategy improves prostate-specific antigen-driven detection of prostate cancer.

    Monique J. Roobol;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ries Kranse;Tineke Wolters

  • Outcomes of men with screen-detected prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance who were managed expectantly.

    Roderick C.N. van den Bergh;Stijn Roemeling;Monique J. Roobol;Gunnar Aus

  • Exosomes as biomarker treasure chests for prostate cancer.

    Diederick Duijvesz;Theo Luider;Chris H. Bangma;Guido Jenster

  • Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Isoform p2PSA in Combination with Total PSA and Free PSA Improves Diagnostic Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Detection

    Flip H. Jansen;Ron H.N. van Schaik;Joep Kurstjens;Wolfgang Horninger

  • Diagnostic and prognostic signatures from the small non-coding RNA transcriptome in prostate cancer

    E S Martens-Uzunova;S E Jalava;N F Dits;G J L H van Leenders

  • Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.

    Charlotte F Kweldam;Mark F. Wildhagen;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Chris H. Bangma

  • Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Frank-Jan H. Drost;Daniel Osses;Daan Nieboer;Chris H. Bangma

  • Anxiety and distress during active surveillance for early prostate cancer.

    Roderick C. N. van den Bergh;Marie-Louise Essink-Bot;Marie-Louise Essink-Bot;Monique J. Roobol;Tineke Wolters

Frequent Co-Authors

Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Guido Jenster
Guido Jenster Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ellen C. Zwarthoff
Ellen C. Zwarthoff Erasmus University Rotterdam
Anssi Auvinen
Anssi Auvinen Tampere University
Ron H.N. van Schaik
Ron H.N. van Schaik Erasmus University Rotterdam
Arnauld Villers
Arnauld Villers University of Lille
Harry J. de Koning
Harry J. de Koning Erasmus University Rotterdam
Teuvo L.J. Tammela
Teuvo L.J. Tammela Tampere University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional path through medical school. Online degree programs in nursing, for example, offer flexible options for students with different backgrounds and experience levels.

For registered nurses looking to advance their education, rn bsn online programs no clinicals provide a convenient solution, allowing RNs to earn their BSN without mandatory in-person clinical requirements. Those seeking advanced practice roles can explore dnp programs online for doctoral-level training and leadership preparation.

Cost is a common concern for many students. Options like cheapest online dnp programs can make higher-level nursing degrees more accessible. For those interested in starting their healthcare careers sooner, it’s important to consider what is the fastest way to become an lpn to quickly enter the workforce as a Licensed Practical Nurse.

Exploring these online pathways can help future healthcare professionals choose a route that best matches their goals, timeline, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Chris H. Bangma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles